ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcome between single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (SILSG) versus laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LASG) in treatment of benign gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with benign gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy between Jan. 2008 and Feb. 2015 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was collected retrospectively. Among them, 15 patients underwent SILSG and 22 patients underwent LASG. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operative time of SILSG group was significantly longer than that of LASG group (P < 0.050). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.050), and the total patient scar assesment scale (PSAS) score was significantly lower (P < 0.050) in the SILSG group than those of LASG group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to other variables (P > 0.050), such as conversion rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, incidence of complication, and visual analog scale score of pain. All patients received postoperative follow up, and the period ranged from 6 months to 25 months, with a median of 11 months. During the follow up period, no one suffered from incision hernia and recurrence of ulcer. ConclusionCompared with LASG, SILSG is a technically feasible procedure with better cosmesis and equivalent curability.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsRelevant literatures were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, CNKI, CBM, Wan-fang database, and VIP databases from Jan. 2009 to Jul. 2019, all the relevant trial documents ［included randomized controlled trial and non randomized controlled trial］ were collected for comparison of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery on the clinical efficacy of rectal cancer patients, the qualified literatures were screened in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, and Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 19 articles were included in the literature with 2 683 patients were included among them. Meta analysis results showed that, compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery group, in laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery group, operation time [WMD=–6.78, 95% CI was (–11.96, –1.60), P<0.01], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=–14.94, 95% CI was (–23.48, –6.40),P<0.01], postoperative exhaust time [WMD=–13.55, 95% CI was (–18.24, –8.85), P<0.01], postoperative hospitalization time [WMD=–1.60, 95% CI was (–2.00, –1.21), P<0.01], incidence of postoperative overall complication [OR=0.50, 95% CI was (0.38, 0.67), P<0.01], and incidence of incision infection [OR=0.19, 95% CI was (0.08, 0.45), P<0.01] reduced. Those differences were not significant, such as intraoperative lymph node resection [WMD=–0.02, 95% CI was (–0.44, 0.40), P=0.92], incision margin distance of tumor [WMD=0.13, 95% CI was (–0.30, 0.55), P=0.56], and incidence of anastomotic fistula [OR=0.97, 95% CI was (0.62, 1.50), P=0.87].ConclusionsLaparoscopic transanal pull through surgery has more safe, effective, and reliable effects than conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. It has further research value, but there may be inevitable bias and other effects in the included literatures, so more randomized controlled clinical trials are needed in the future.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current common clinical laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods, and to provide reference for clinicians to choose reasonable localization methods. MethodThe domestic and foreign literatures related to laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe common localization methods for laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery were imaging localization, preoperative endoscopic localization, intraoperative endoscopic localization and intraoperative fluorescence localization, among which abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopic-related localization methods were the most commonly used localization methods in clinical practice at present. ConclusionA variety of methods are available for surgeons to choose from, and the precise localization of tumors is better facilitated by combining multiple methods.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical value of Caprini risk score (CRS) and D-dimer testing, both individually and in combination, for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. MethodsThrough systematic literature review and analysis, we evaluated the advantages and limitations of these two tools in predicting VTE, with emphasis on their combined utility and respective detection characteristics. ResultsCRS demonstrated superior population stratification efficacy for initial VTE screening post-laparoscopy but showed limitations in assessing individual heterogeneity. D-dimer testing exhibited high sensitivity in detecting postoperative hypercoagulable states, yet its specificity was confounded by surgical stress-induced coagulation activation. Their integration established a multidimensional assessment system that significantly enhanced identification accuracy of high-risk VTE populations. ConclusionsThe combined application of CRS and D-dimer biomarkers optimizes postoperative VTE risk stratification management and provides evidence-based guidance for defining precise anticoagulation therapy timeframes. Future research should prioritize refinement of risk assessment tools to facilitate dynamic patient monitoring, thereby guiding targeted thromboprophylaxis and reducing occult VTE risk.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.
Objective To observe effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) technique on stress indicators in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods One hundred and twenty patients underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (Dixon) in the Xinqiao Hospital of the Third Military Medical University were included in this study and then were randomly divided into an ERAS group (n=60) and a conventional treatment group (n=60). The patients in the ERAS group were treated with an ERAS concept during the perioperative period. The patients in the conventional treatment group were treated with a traditional treatment concept during the perioperative period. The stress indicators including white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were compared in the two groups at admission, 1 h before operation, and 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after operation. The first postoperative anal exhaust time, the first postoperative defecation time, the total hospitalization time, and readmission rate were also recorded after operation. Results ① The age, gender, tumor diameter, and TNM stage had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② There were no significant differences in the WBC, CRP and IL-6 levels at admission and 1 h before operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, and WBC in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after operation (P<0.05). ③ The first postoperative anal exhaust time, the first postoperative defecation time, and the total hospitalization time in the ERAS group were significantly shorter than those in the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in readmission rate between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion ERAS concept is helpful in reducing stress response and could promote earlier recovery of patients with rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsThe data of two cases undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including operative time, operation related complications, intraoperative bleeding volumes, number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications, time to restoration of bowel function, and length of postoperative hospital stay, etc, were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsTwo patients had undergone the successful hand-assisted laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and distal gastrectomy without operation related complications. The operative time was 310 min and 220 min, respectively. While, the intraoperative bleeding volume was 120 ml and 80 ml with the number of harvested lymph node being 38 and 52, respectively. There were no postoperative bleeding, intestinal fistula, and anastomotic leakage， etc. The patients were discharged with smooth and fully recovery. ConclusionThe application of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is feasible and safe. However, the effectiveness needs further exploring.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS+1) for patients with obesity. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on obese patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) from January 2023 to November 2024 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were stratified into two groups: SILS+1 group and conventional multi-port LSG (MPLSG) group. Comparative parameters included operative time, postoperative hospital stay, complications rate, weight loss outcomes, and improvement in metabolic indicators [including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)]. ResultsA total of 95 patients with obesity were enrolled, including 40 in the SILS+1 group and 55 in the MPLSG group. The SILS+1 group had significantly lower preoperative body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, and TC level compared to the MPLSG group (P<0.05), and a significantly higher proportion of female patients (P<0.05). Other baseline characteristics, such as age, TG and HDL-C levels, showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Operative time was significantly longer in the SILS+1 group than in the MPLSG group [(100.16±17.53) min vs. (93.82±20.83) min, P<0.001]. The proportion of patients requiring drainage tube placement was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group as compared with the MPLSG group [55.0% (22/40) vs. 76.4% (42/55), P=0.049]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the need for additional trocar sites, change in hemoglobin level from preoperative to postoperative day 1, postoperative hospital stay, or incidence of postoperative (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ) complications (P>0.05). No 30-day readmissions occurred in either group. One patient in the SILS+1 group required an additional trocar site. Gastrointestinal patency was normal in all patients, with no signs of contrast agent leakage or stricture observed. Both SILS+1 and MPLSG procedures demonstrated equivalent efficacy in weight loss outcomes (P>0.05) and in their effects on HbA1c, TG, and TC levels (P>0.05). The SILS+1 procedure showed a significant advantage in improving HDL-C level (F=6.221, P=0.015), with significantly higher postoperative HDL-C level observed at 6 months postoperatively compared to the MPLSG group (F=2.500, P=0.027). ConclusionsFor selected obese populations, SILS+1 represents a feasible and safe alternative to MPLSG. This technique demonstrates equivalent efficacy to MPLSG in early-stage weight loss and metabolic improvement, serving as a transitional approach toward pure single-incision LSG.
ObjectiveTo explore the security and feasibility of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SCRLM). MethodThe data of 36 patients underwent simultaneous surgery for SCRLM in the Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from March 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, and the perioperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity and survival were analyzed. ResultsThe surgical procedure of all 36 enrolled patients were accomplished. The operation time was (328.9±85.8) min. The intraoperative blood loss was 100 (50, 150) mL and 4 cases (11.1%) needed intraoperative transfusion. The time to first flatus was (2.9±0.8) d and the time to liquid diet was (3.2±1.0) d. The average postoperative VAS score was 1.9±0.3. The postoperative length of stay was (6.8±4.3) d, 5 (13.9%) cases developed postoperative complications, which were cured by conservative treatment. No severe complications and death occurred within 30 days after surgery. After a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 15 cases (41.7%) experienced recurrence or metastasis and 1 case (2.8%) died. The 1-, 2- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 89.8%, 55.0%, 29.2%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 100.0%, 87.5%, respectively. There was no significant differences in disease-free survival rates (χ2=1.675, P=0.196) and OS (χ2=0.600, P=0.439) between patients with (n=26) or without (n=10) neoadjuvant. ConclusionsSimultaneous laparoscopic surgery seems to be a secure and feasible strategy for patients with SCRLM, with considerable survival benefits and short-term outcomes including small incision, little bleeding, quick recovery and low complication rate. More high-quality clinical studies are desirable in the future to further confirm the efficacy and safety of this operation.