Objective To explore the operative managements of ectopic gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods Twenty one cases of ectopic gallbladder undergone LC in this hospital were analyzed regarding the perioperative management, principle, and technique of operation.Results There were 2 cases of situs transversus, 1 case with gallbladder under right posterior lobe of liver, 2 under left lateral lobe of liver and 16 in the liver. All 21 cases of ectopic gallbladder had undergone LC successfully, and no complications were found during and after operation. Conclusion Anatomic ectopia of gallbladder tosses a challenging problem to laparoscopic surgeon. It is safe for surgeons to recognise actual anatomical anomaly and to manage them appropriately.
To analyse the causes of biliary injuries and summuarize the experience of prevention of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Twenty-three patients with biliary duct injury were diagnosed and treated at our center between September 1992 and August 1998. The main causes were either misidentification of the bile duct or aberrant right duct as the cystic or injudicious use of thermal energy (cautery) to dissect, control bleeding, or divide tissue. Conclusion: The causes of biliary duct injury are complex. Training and experience of sugeon, the meticulous dissection of the calot′s triangle and preoperative or operative cholangiography are three key factors in prevention of biliary duct injury during LC.
Objective To explore the prevention and treatment of injury to brangches of the middle hepatic vein in laparoecopic cholecystectomy. Methods The clinical data of ?27 hemorrhage cases of ?injury to brangches of the middle hepatic vein in laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2008 to January 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Results All 27 hemorrhage cases were successfully stopped bleeding under laparoscopy by the way of packing hemostasis （n=17）, clamping hemostasis （n=6）, and suturing hemostasis （n=4）. In the 3 hemostasis methods, the operating time and amout of bleeding in the cases with packing hemostasis was the shortest and the least, respectively, which was （90.26±12.46） min and （240.32±80.15）ml, respectively, but the differences of the 3 methods were not statistical significance （P＞0.05）. Conclusions During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gallbladder bed should be seperated in the correct plane to avoid injury to brangches of the middle hepatic vein. The most important to ensure surgery safety is applying the right surgical hemostasis method to stop bleeding quickly, and the open surgery will be the first choice in the right time when the difficult hemostasis occurs under laparoscopy.
Objective To discuss the safety，feasibility，and advantages of two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC）．Methods The clinical data of 114 patients underwent LC from June 2008 to October 2010 were retrospectively analyzed，of which 46 underwent two-port LC （two-port LC group，n=46） and 68 underwent three-port LC （three-port LC group，n=68）. The operation time，intraoperative blood loss，postoperative feeding time，postoperative pain，postoperative hospital stay，and hospitalization expenses were compared between two groups. Results All the operations were successful，no postoperative complications occurred in both groups．The operation time in the two-port LC group was longer than that in the three-port LC group （P＜0.05）. The intraoperative blood loss，postoperative feeding time，postoperative pain，and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences in two groups （P＞0.05）. The hospitalization expenses in the two-port group was less than that in the three-port group（P＜0.05）. Conclusions Two-port LC is a safe and feasible operation in the simple gallstone patients. It is cautious in those patients with acute cholecystitis because of the restricted vision and operation．
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of bile duct injury due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the preventive methods. MethodsA total of 18 patients with bile duct injury (with the occurrence rate of 0.4%) after LC between January 2003 and December 2012 were included. The patients included 5 males and 13 females with the age of 29-63 years old[averaging (42.3±3.6) years old]. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the 18 cases of bile duct injury, 5 cases occur in emergency operation, 13 cases in selective operation. The operators were attending physician in 13 cases, and senior position in the other 5 cases. The reasons of the injury included misjudgment of the cystic duct in 9, duct aberrance in 3, excessive stretch of cystic duct in 2, 2 Mirizzi syndrome withⅠ-type surgical injury in 2, and right liver duct injury because of inappropriate stripping of gallbladder in 1. ConclusionThe operator's experience, severe conglutination and the bile duct aberrance are the chief causes. Preventive methods include strict system of operation accession, careful selection of candidates, timely laparotomy, and paying attention to the accumulation of operation experience and skills.
ObjectiveTo investigate the socioeconomic benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in perioperative period of selective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) by prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study.MethodsA total of 90 patients were recruited in the Hetian Regional People’s Hospital from November 1, 2019 to December 25, 2019. PASS 11 software was used to calculate the sample size. They were grouped into an ERAS group and a tradition group by 1∶1 by random digital table. The patients in the ERAS and the tradition groups were treated with ERAS conception and traditional method respectively during the perioperative period. The postoperative hospitalization time, the first feeding time, the first getting out of bed time, and the first anal exhaust time after operation; the total hospitalization costs, intraoperative infusion, and postoperative total infusion; the intraoperative anesthesia intubation method, trocar layout, and operation time; the pain points of 6 h,12 h and 24 h after operation; the nausea and vomiting after operation; complications and re-hospitalization rate within 30 d after operation were compared between two groups.ResultsA total of 86 patients finally were included in the study, including 44 cases in the ERAS group and 42 cases in the tradition group. The basic data such as the gender, age, body mass index, etiology, blood routine, liver and kidney functions, etc. between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in the intraoperative anesthesia intubation method, trocar layout, and operation time (P>0.05). Compared with the tradition group, the hospitalization time, the first feeding time, the first getting out of bed time, and the first anal exhaust time after operation were shorter (P<0.05); the total hospitalization costs, intraoperative infusion, and postoperative total infusion were less (P<0.05); the pain points of 6 h,12 h and 24 h after operation were lower (P<0.05); and the times of nausea and vomiting after operation were less (P<0.05) in the ERAS group. There were no complications such as the intraperitoneal bleeding, biliary leakage, and infection after operation, and no re-hospitalized patients within 30 d in both groups.ConclusionApplication of ERAS conception in selective LC perioperative period in Hetian Regional People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region cannot only shorten postoperative hospitalization time, reduce costs of hospitalization, help to overcome poverty, but also reduce occurrence of complications such as pain, nausea and vomiting, etc.
Objective To prevent bile duct injury, a new anatomy marker, named “common bile duct window” is created. Methods From November 2005 to March 2006, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were researched in this hospital. All data were collected, including: age, gender, course of disease, body mass index (BMI), blood lipid level (triglyceride and cholesterol), the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis. The frequency, location and mean size of “common bile duct window” were recorded and calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of “common bile duct window”, and the diference of data between two groups was analyzed by using χ2 test or t test. Results “Common bile duct window” was found at the end of hepatoduoduenal ligament with oval-shaped, the mean longitude of “common bile duct window” was (1.20±0.60) cm, and mean width was (0.45±0.30) cm. “Common bile duct window” were found in 81.6% (49/60) of patients. Age, gender, course of disease, BMI, triglyceride and cholesterol were proved to have no relationship with the presence of “common bile duct window” （Pgt;0.05）, but the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis affected the presence （P＜0.05）. Conclusion An oval-shaped “common bile duct window” can be found in almost all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the operation, the common bile duct can be located easily by the surgeon through “common bile duct window”, thereby to avoid common bile duct injury when the cyst duct was dissected. It is believed that during laparoscopic cholecystectomy the chances of bile duct injuries can be effectively decreased by the presence of “common bile duct window”.
Objective To discuss the pathogeny， treatment and prophylactic measures of postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Methods The clinical data of 150 patients with laparoscopic PCS in our department from October 2000 to March 2009 were analyzed. Results Etiological factors were found in 131 patients: one hundred and twelve cases were due to the reasons of biliary system, including bile duct residual stones after cystic resection， the injury bile duct stenosis， a long residual cystic canal， nipple benign stricture, bile duct tumor etc; Nineteen examples were due to other reasons, including gallbladder stone merger reflux gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer， diverticulum beside duodenal nipple, and so on, which resulted in the symptoms un-release after cystic resection. Nineteen cases were not found organic lesion. In ones whose etiological factors were definite, 117 cases were treated with different surgeries according to different etiological factors; another 33 cases were treated with conservative treatment. Total 145 cases were followed up, and 139 cases in them were cured or relieved at different degrees. Conclusion Careful preoperative examination, normalized operation avoiding damaging bile duct and leaving behind bile duct stones can effectively prevent laparoscopic PCS.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and surgical techniques of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy （LSC) in treatment for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with severe gallstone gallbladder inflammation, adhesion, or atrophy. MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with severe gallstone gallbladder inflammation, adhesion, or atrophy admitted to this hospital between January 2006 and April 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsEighty-one patients were performed LSC, 2 patients were converted to laparotomy. In which 39 patients with the part of wall residual of the fundus and (or) body of the gallbladder, 26 patients with residual of part of gallbladder neck, 18 patients with residual of part of gallbladder body and neck. Fifty-one cases were followed-up for 3 months to 4 years, there were 2 patients with the change like “mini gallbladder” by B ultrasound and no obviously clinical symptoms. There was no ostcholecystectomy syndrome in the patients with follow-up. ConclusionsLSC is a safe, effective, feasible procedure for severe gallstone gallbladder inflammation, adhesion, or atrophy, which can effectively prevent bile duct injury, bleeding, or other serious complications. While it can also reduce the rate of conversion to laparotomy.
As a new discipline, the cardiac surgery has a great development in the modern age, but still faces many problems and disputes. The emergence of the evidence-based medicine (EBM), which emphasizes the best evidence, and combines the doctor’s clinical experience to make the best judgment, gives the development of the cardiac surgery a new thinking. Four systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2004) have interprated the importance of EBM on how to resolve the actual problems in different field of the cardiac surgery.