Objective To explore the consultation model of multi-disciplinary team （MDT） for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Combined the characteristics of large public hospital, with recognized treatment pathway in international MDT for CRC and a comparison to the traditional consultation, to explore a consultation process model of multi-disciplinary team-working for colorectal cancer of West China Hospital (MDT-CRC-WCH) by own feature. Results Colorectal cancer MDT project team summarized the advantage of the consultation process of MDT-CRC-WCH and the drawback of the traditional consultation, descripted the purpose and characterisctics of MDT consultation by adopting creative whole-mode ideal of MDT-CRC-WCH, and descripted the present implementation of the consultation of MDT-CRC-WCH. Conclusion The consultation process of MDT has appeared distinctive features to the traditional, and it may direct the future evolving of the consultation model, however, advanced research is needed.
Objective To compare the clinical effect between neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation and simple operation under multi-disciplinary team in rectal cancer. Methods A survey of 72 patients with rectal cancer from Nov. 2007 to Mar. 2008 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups using a simple random method: 33 cases in combined therapy group were treated with single period neo-adjuvant chemotherapy as well as operation and 39 cases in control group received operation only. To compare the differences of perioperative period indexes between two groups. Results During the differences of indexes of age, gender, differentiation degree, clinicopathologic stage as well as the distance to dentate line of tumor, there was no statistical significance between combined therapy group and control group (Pgt;0.05). And at the same time, the operative type, operative time and bleeding quantity in operation had no statistically significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). As for the postoperative rehabilitation indexes, the time of vent to normal in combined therapy group was earlier than that in control group, but the intake time was later than that in control group （Plt;0.05）. Falling range from preoperative CEA to postoperative CEA was larger in combined therapy group than that in control group （Plt;0.05）; and the falling range from preoperative WBC to postoperative WBC had no significant difference between two groups （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of combined therapy is obviously superior to simple operation, suggesting that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation is feasible and safe.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation on colorectal cancer patients in the multi-disciplinary team (MDT). Methods The data were collected retrospectively from January to December in 2007. The patients were classified as non-adjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemotherapy group according to the treatment strategy. Non-adjuvant chemotherapy group had accepted only surgery followed by preoperative neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy group had taken postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and operation. The clinical effect of two groups were compared. Results Totally 789 patients were treated among 2007, and 195 patients who were firstly diagnosed as colorectal cancer were included, and there were 109 males and 86 females, 59 colonic cancers and 136 rectal cancers. Average age was 59.98 years old. All of the included patients were followed up for 5-17 months. Three cases missed, no recurrence and no death happened. The baseline between non-adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy group was nearly same. There were no differences between two groups about the internal medicine complications, the cancer related obstruction, preoperative transfusion or not (P＞0.05). Whether the patients were transfused or not during the procedure and Dukes stage were significantly different between two groups(P＜0.05), while the other surgical and pathological index didnt show any statistical significance (P＞0.05). After operation, more patients in non-adjuvant chemotherapy group had accepted transfusion (P＜0.05). However, the postoperative rehabilitative indexes during hospitalization were not different between two groups. And the differences about the postoperative complications and defecation were not significant (P＞0.05). The values of CEA and CA19-9 were greatly different between two groups in the 1st and 3rd month follow-up. Conclusion The strategy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy/operation/adjuvant chemotherapy didnt affect the rehabilitation and increase the risk of complications, however, more researches were necessary to prove whether the clinical effect were improved or not.
Objective To summarize recent advances on preoperative staging strategies in rectal cancer. Methods Relevant references about preoperative staging strategies were collected and reviewed. The multimodal preoperative evaluation (MPE) system recently documented was focused on. Results The comparably accurate T and M stage could be achieved preoperatively by following an appropriate available method; however, the N stage’s accuracy was still not satisfying. The MPE system， incorporating with the advantages of transrectal ultrasound， computerized tomography and serum amyloid A protein in a multi-disciplinary mode could display the most accurate preoperative staging for rectal cancer currently. Conclusion The MPE has potential prospects in preoperative staging of rectal cancer， and can provide the most accurate preoperative staging for rectal cancer at present.
Objective To explore the intervention effect on colorectal cancer operation by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in multi-disciplinary team. Methods To analyze retrospectively the data of patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2007 to December 2007, and the planned and actual operative strategy were compared between MDT group and non-MDT group. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 251 colorectal cancer patients were included which had 183 rectal cancer and 68 colon cancer. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal, and there was no difference of planned operative strategy between two groups. For patients planned undergoing standard ano-saving radical procedure, the ratio of actual procedure same to the planned and the ratio of radical procedure changed to expansive ano-saving radical procedure showed no significant differences between MDT group and non-MDT group (Pgt;0.05), whereas the difference of the ratio of radical procedure changed to local radical procedure between two groups was statistically significant (Plt;0.01). And the constituent ratio of actual procedure between two groups for patients which planned accepted non-ano-saving procedure didn’t have any significant difference (Pgt;0.05). For the cancer focus, the relief differences of complete remission and partial remission were statistically significant between two groups (P＜0.01), but the difference of the constituent ratio of T staging change was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The value of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should not be limited to decrease the stage of cancer, and it is important to pay more attention to the high quality of combined therapy. Further research should be carried out to find the contribution of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to mini-invasive surgery.
Objective To further discuss the strategies for building the framework of team culture of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for colorectal cancer. Methods By analyzing the present situation of volunteer team of MDT and exploring the problems existed, look for new strategies to develop the volunteer team. Results The new strategies, such as optimizing the framework of the volunteer team and introducing into systematic and standardized training program, together with the gradually enlarged propaganda for the volunteer team, promote the development of MDT effectively. Conclusion By the exploration and practice in early stage, the volunteer team of MDT is gradually working smoothly. It is necessary to improve the strategies for developing the volunteer team of MDT constantly to make it integrate the MDT.
As an important practice of collaborative medicine, multi-disciplinary team (MDT) plays a key role in improving the level of diagnosis and treatment of difficult and complex diseases. MDT quality evaluation is an important research content to promote the development of MDT model, which directly affects the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment and patient experience. This paper systematically summarizes the relevant literature at home and abroad, focuses on MDT quality evaluation methods and tools, combs the dimensions and indicators of quality evaluation in different scenarios, and summarizes the common quality control laws in MDT practice. On this basis, combined with the characteristics and practical bottlenecks of China’s MDT model, this paper puts forward the key directions that should be paid attention to in the future MDT quality evaluation research, in order to provide theoretical references for the construction of MDT quality evaluation framework and promote the standardized development of MDT model.
Objective To evaluate the risk of management decision combined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with operation for colorectal cancer by means of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM). Methods One hundred and eighty-one eligible patients (102 male, 79 female, mean age 58.78 years), which were pathologically proved colorectal cancer in our ward from July to November 2007, involved 62 colonic and 119 rectal cancer. The enrollment were assigned into multi-disciplinary team (MDT) group (n=65) or non-MDT group (n=116), according to whether the MDT was adopted, and the operative risk was analyzed by ACPGBI-CCM. Results The baseline characteristics of MDT and non-MDT group were coherent. The watershed of lower risk group (LRG) and higher risk group (HRG) was set as predictive mortality=2.07%. The time involving extraction of gastric, urethral and drainage tube, feeding, out-of-bed activity after operation in MDT group, whatever in LRG or HRG, were statistically earlier than those in non-MDT group (P＜0.05). The resectable rate in LRG was statistically higher than that in HRG (P＜0.05), and the proportion of Dukes staging was significantly different (P＜0.05) between two groups; Moreover, predictive mortality in HRG was statistically higher than that in LRG (P＜0.05), while actually there was no death in both groups. Conclusion Dukes staging which is included as an indispensable option by ACPGBI-CCM is responsible for the lower predictive mortality in LRG.Hence, the value of ACPGBI-CCM used to asses the morbidity of complications within 30 days postoperatively would be warranted by further research. The postoperative risk evaluation can serve as a novel routine to comprehensively analyze the short-term safe in the MDT.
Objective To analyze the primary status of database in multi-disciplinary team （MDT） of colorectal cancer, and to explore the tendency in construction of database in the future. Methods Described the current status of different database respectively, and analyzed the data statistically, involving the patients’ general information, essential information of duration of hospital stay, therapy and MDT from the database of patients. Results The development of different database was uncoordinated. Among the total, the database of patients was advanced, the database of reference and the database of specialists were also developing in certain. Conclusion The primary reason, which results in the lag of construction of database currently, is the long span of database and the cost of much time in data acquisition. The direction of development of database involves consummation of database gradually, refreshment of it promptly, and expanding the research of informatics related clinical medicine.
The deep integration of modern technology and medical development promotes the change of medical and health management environment. As an important part of hospital medical and health decision-making process, the evaluation and access of medical equipment and consumables need scientific evidence-based evaluation system. This paper introduces a new-equipment evaluation model created by the multi-disciplinary evaluation team of West China Hospital of Sichuan University under the guidance of evidence-based ideas and methods. This model is suitable for the Chinese national conditions and easy to operate.