Objective To analyze the effect of monitoring and modulating the portal vein pressure and blood flow during living donor liver transplantation （LDLT） on preventing small-for-size-syndrome (SFSS). Methods Data of forty-four LDLT recipients between Oct.2007 and Oct.2008 were reviewed. Actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio（GRWR）, portal vein flow and pressure during operation and syndrome of SFSS after operation were recorded. The patients received splenectomy or splenic artery ligation according to actual GRWR, portal vein flow and pressure and WBC. Relationships between patients’ GRWR, portal vein flow, portal vein pressure and occurrence of SFSS were analyzed. Results Six patients received splenectomy and 7 patients received splenic artery ligation to decrease the portal vein flow and pressure during the operation. The portal vein flow and pressure decreased after splenectomy （Plt;0.05）. The portal vein pressure decreased （Plt;0.05） and the portal vein flow had no significant change after splenic artery ligation （P＞0.05）. No SFSS occurred after operation. Conclusion Modulation of portal vein flow and pressure by splenectomy or splenic artery ligation during LDLT operation can decrease the portal vein flow and pressure, and which can prevent the incidence of SFSS.
ObjectiveTo investigate the radiological appearances of postoperative complications after living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma under multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. MethodsThirty-nine imaging data in 20 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation from January 2008 to June 2010 in the West China Hospital were included and analyzed by two radiologists respectively. The relations between the types of complications and radiological appearances were especially recorded. ResultsAll the cases experienced complications to different extent. Common surgical complications occured in 20 cases, including pertitoneal fluid collection (14 cases), pneumoperitoneum (2 cases), swelling of peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery (1 case), abdominal wall swelling (2 cases), pleural effusion (9 cases), and pericardial fluid collection (2 cases). Hepatic vascular complications involved hepatic artery in 3 cases, portal vein in 5 cases. Biliary complications presented in 7 cases, including anastomotic stenosis of biliary duct (6 cases) and bile leak (1 case). Graft parenchymal complications included intrahepatic lymph retention (11 cases), infarction (3 cases), and infection (2 cases). Intrahepatic recurrence in 5 cases, intraperitoneal metastasis in 3 csses and pulmonary metastasis in 2 cases. ConclusionMDCT and MRI have important diagnostic values for postoperative complications after living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
ObjectiveTo more comprehensive understanding the survival situation of donors after liver transplantation, which can be applied to clinical diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe related literatures in recent years of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) postoperative complications, quality of life, and liver regeneration were reviewed, and the donors postoperative survival situation were investigated. ResultsLDLT has become an option, It is safe and feasible for healthy adults to donate partial liver for LDLT. ConclusionsDonor postoperative survival situation is very important, and it affect the development of LDLT.To improve donors postoperative survival situation, we still need more efforts.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical progress on living related liver transplantation (LRLT). MethodsThe latest progress were reviewed based on recent documents and the experience on LRLT in our department. ResultsLRLT made much progress on evaluation of donor, harvesting the graft liver, donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation, and main factors affecting the survival of liver graft and so on. Conclusion Living related liver transplantation has many unsurpassable advantages, which suits the situation of China and has capacious clinical application.
ObjectiveTo evaluate donor safety in living donor liver transplantation. MethodsThe clinical data of 356 donors underwent living liver donation in our center from January 2001 to September 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into pre-2008 group(before January 2008) and post-2008 group(after January 2008). The donor safety was evaluated with regard to three aspects, i.e. complications, liver function, and quality of life. Results①There was no donor death in our center.②The overall complications rate was 23.3%(83/356). The proportion of ClavienⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, andⅣcomplications was 50.6%(42/83), 26.5%(22/83), 21.7%(18/83), and 1.2%(1/83), respectively. In all the donors, the incidence of ClavienⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, andⅣcomplications was 11.8%(42/356), 6.2%(22/356), 5.1%(18/356), and 0.3%(1/356), respectively. The overall complications rate in the post-2008 group was significantly lower than that in the pre-2008 group〔18.1%(41/227) versus 32.6%(42/129), P < 0.01〕. The most common complication was the biliary complication with an incidence of 8.4%(30/356).③The postoperative liver dysfunction was transient and generally retur-ned to normal level within a week.④The donor's quality of life was generally satisfied as assessed by the SF-36 tool, and 94.8%(239/252) of them would donate again if necessary. ConclusionEver improving surgical and anesthetic techniques, together with strict donor selection and specialized perioperative management, could guarantee a low donor morbidity and a satisfactory long-term prognosis.
Objective To investigate the dynamic changes of postoperative liver reserve function and laboratory liver function as well as liver volume regeneration, and their potential relationship with short-term clinical outcomes after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods The data of 30 recipients underwent LDLT were prospectively collected. The plasma clearance (K) by indocyanine green (ICG) excretive test, liver function test by laboratory methods, liver volume by CT and shortterm (lt;3 months) complications were analyzed. Results The graft recipient body weight ratio (GRBW) was 0.63%-1.43%. The hepatic volume of the recipients in the operation was (638±103) ml, which was smaller than that day 7, 30, and 90 after operation (Plt;0.001), but the hepatic volume at subsequent time point was not different from that at the former time point (Pgt;0.05). The KICG values of recipients among the day 3 〔(0.177±0.056)/min〕, 7 〔(0.183±0.061)/min〕, 30 〔(0.200±0.049)/min〕, and 90 〔(0.209±0.050)/min〕 after operation gradually increased, which was respectively higher than that of recipients before operation (P=0.006, P=0.002, Plt;0.001, and Plt;0.001). Compared with the baseline KICG 〔(0.228±0.036)/min〕 of the donors, the KICG of recipients showed significant variation on day 3 and 7 after operation (P=0.004 and P=0.015), and the KICG of recipients on day 30 and 90 after operation approached the baseline KICG (P=0.355 and P=0.915). The recipients were divided into good liver function group (n=23) and poor liver function group (n=7) according to total serum bilirubin on day 14 after operation. The KICG significantly dropped compared with the recipients of good liver function group on day 3 after operation (P=0.001). Conclusions The liver volume regenerates dramatically on day 7 after operation for the recipients. The ICG excretivetest shows that volume recovery occurs much more gradually than the recovery of function in the recipients. The ICG excretive test is a more reliable indicator of graft function and subsequent graft outcome early after LDLT.
ObjectiveTo evaluate and summarize the perioperative management experience of living related liver transplantation (LRLT). MethodsA retrospective analysis was made in perioperative management of 13 cases undergoing LRLT (15 times operation, including 2 cases of liver retransplantation) in our department from January 2001 to December 2002. ResultsAll the operations were successful. All the 13 donors were followed up regularly, 12 donors were uneventfully recovered after operation and 1 donor suffered from bile leakage due to T tube. The survival rate of recipients, who achieved longterm survival at 2 months to 2 years, was 92.3%(12/13); the survival rate of graft was 86.7%(13/15). One adult recipient with Wilson’s disease died of serious rejection on the 72nd day postoperatively. Two cases suffered from embolism of hepatic artery, one case received reduced size cadaveric liver retransplantation, the other case received liver retransplantation from cadaver, and they both achieved longterm survival after retransplantation. The other complications included: 1 case of serious rejection, 2 cases of ARDS, 6 cases of infection of microbe, 7 cases of serious hydrothorax, 1 cases of leakage of biliary tract, and so on. ConclusionPerfect preoperative management, which composes one of the key parts of LRLT, is critically important for both donor and recipient.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo study the advances in use of imaging in the evaluation of living donor liver. Methods The literatures in recent years on the use of imaging in evaluation of living donor liver were reviewed. ResultsPreoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the donor allowed accurate determination of liver volume and rough determination of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis of the liver. CT angiography could assess the anatomy of hepatic artery, portal vein and hepatic veins. Intraoperative cholangiography allowed detection of the anatomy of the biliary tree. ConclusionImaging techniques are widely used in the evaluation of liver volume, vasculature and biliary system in the living donor liver.
Objective To research anesthetic management, pathophysiologic variation of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-ALDLT) and to probe how to improve anesthetic quality of A-ALDLT. Methods The clinical data of 47 donors from Sep. 2005 to Jan. 2007 in West China Hospital were reviewed. Intraoperative vital signs, anesthetic management, perioperative serum levels of HGB， Alb， ALT， AST, TBIL， APTT， PT were measured， and complications were assessed. Results The physical condition of all donors were good before operations and were all in grade Ⅰaccording to ASA. Under general anesthesia of intravenous and inhalation, electrocardiogram, O2 saturation, blood pressure and body temperature were continuously monitored. A radial arterial catheter and a central venous catheter were placed. Blood lavement was utilized intraoperatively in all patients. All donors maintained stable life signs intraoperatively. The average intraoperative blood losses was （603.13±317.00） ml, and donors were transfused with autologous blood 〔(381.25±171.15) ml〕, with only 4 donors required homologous blood transfusion. HR and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) showed no significantly variations intraoperatively (Pgt;0.05). Compared with controlled central venous pressure (CVP) before and right after hepatectomy, CVP increased significantly (P＜0.05) when intubation and abdomen-closing were carried. After hepatectomy and on the first day after operation, HGB and Alb decreased significantly (P＜0.05); ALT, AST and TBIL increased significantly (P＜0.05). Right after hepatectomy, PT increased instantly and significantly (P＜0.05); On the first day after operation, APTT began to increase significantly (P＜0.05). All donors came around completely and were extubated in the liver transplantation intensive care unit on the first day after operation. There were 3 cases (6.38%) of postoperative complication, which were biliary leakage, portal vein thrombosis and serious pleural effusion. Those 3 donors were cured after treatment. Conclusion Inhalation and intravenous general anesthesia of propofol, remifen-tanil and isoflurane can maintain stable life signs and reduce liver injury. Steady anesthesia, sufficient oxygenation and effective blood protection measures, for example, by decreasing CVP to prevent bleeding and by reclaiming autologous blood to avoid transfusing homologous blood, are keys for the safety of the donor and the prevention of complications.
Objective To analyze the risk factors associated with fungal infections in adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods Data of 189 recipients from January 2006 to December 2012 who received LDLT at our center were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for postoperative fungal infections. Results Postoperative fungal infection was found in 12 recipients. The most common infectious site was lung, whereas the most common fungal pathogen was Candida albicans. Multivariate analysis suggested preoperative low albumin level [HR=0.792, 95%CI (0.694, 0.903), P=0.001], massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion [HR=4.322, 95%CI (1.308, 14.277), P=0.016] and longer postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay [HR=3.399, 95%CI (1.004, 11.506), P=0.049] were the independent risk factors for postoperative fungal infections. Conclusions Lung is the most common fungal infection site after LDLT. Preoperative low albumin level, massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion and longer postoperative ICU contribute to fungal infections after LDLT.