ObjectiveTo investigate the willingness and influencing factors of clinical medicine graduate students to study abroad.MethodsFrom September 2019 to January 2020, a survey was conducted among the clinical medicine graduate students in West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University. An anonymous self-report questionnaire was used to investigate their willingness to study abroad, and the related influencing factors were analyzed.ResultsA total of 600 questionnaires were distributed, in which 518 valid questionnaires were collected. Among the 518 graduate students, 96.14% anticipated to study abroad, and 93.05% expected to subsidize the study abroad through the state-sponsored study abroad fund. The major obstacle for studying abroad for joint training was concerning the negative effects on domestic clinical work or scientific research work, resulting in failure to graduate; meanwhile, difficulty in applying was the primary obstacle for studying abroad for a doctorate.ConclusionsThere is a strong willingness for clinical medicine graduate students to study abroad. However, it is affected by graduation time and application.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the teaching effects of Seminar teaching model versus lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching model on clinical medical students in China.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Data and VIP database were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Seminar versus LBL applied in clinical medical students in China, from the establishment of database to October 2017. The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs with 741 students were enrolled, including 380 in Seminar teaching group and 361 in LBL teaching group. The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that the basic theory score [standard mean difference (SMD)=1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.72, 1.62), P<0.000 01], the clinical skill score [SMD=1.33, 95%CI (0.82, 1.83), P<0.000 01], the classroom atmosphere score ［SMD=1.51, 95%CI (1.13, 1.90), P<0.000 01］, the team score [SMD=0.86, 95%CI (0.50, 1.22), P<0.000 01], and the autonomous learning ability score [SMD=2.25, 95%CI (0.31, 4.18), P=0.02] of Seminar teaching group were superior to those in the LBL teaching group.ConclusionThe Seminar teaching model is superior to the LBL teaching model in clinical medical students.
目的：總結汶川地震中骨折患者的康復治療及其傷情分析，為災難醫學中骨折患者的康復治療提供經驗。方法：收集四川大學華西醫院地震傷員康復中心的112例骨折患者資料，對傷情進行分析并對其康復治療情況進行總結。結果：經康復治療后患者的日常生活活動能力明顯提高。結論：康復治療對骨折患者非常重要。
Objective To systematically review the teaching effects of problem-based learning (PBL) combined with lecture-based learning (LBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models on students in surgical clinical education in China. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PBL+LBL versus LBL applied in surgery education in China from inception to February 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Fourteen RCTs including 1 386 students were included. The results of meta-analysis showed, compared with LBL, PBL+LBL were superior in basic knowledge of surgery (MD=3.33, 95%CI 2.07 to 4.60, P<0.000 01), case analysis (MD=5.90, 95%CI 2.61 to 9.19,P=0.000 4), clinical skills (MD=3.38, 95%CI 0.57 to 6.19, P=0.02), comprehensive performance (MD=7.15, 95%CI 3.87 to 10.43, P<0.000 1) and teaching satisfaction (OR=3.05, 95%CI 1.90 to 4.9,P<0.000 01) with significant difference. There was no differences in inquiry/physical examination/medical record between the two groups (MD=0.82, 95%CI 0 to 1.64,P=0.05). Conclusions PBL+LBL teaching method is superior to LBL in surgical clinical education in China. Large-scale and high quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the above conclusions.