Lung microbiome is defined as the specific microbiota of lung. Lung microbiome can make the lung in a state of chronic inflammation through direct destruction, activation of inflammatory cells and release of inflammatory factors, and then progress to lung cancer. There are significant differences in lung microbiome between lung cancer patients and healthy people. Some specific microbial flora can be used as a diagnostic marker of lung cancer. Specific microbial communities are related to the efficacy of immunotherapy, and microbial composition may be used as a marker of immune-related adverse events. There are both challenges and opportunities for research on the relationship between lung microbiome and lung cancer. This review will focus on the significance and value of lung microbiome in the occurrence, diagnosis and immunotherapy of lung cancer, in order to provide a reference for basic and clinical researchers in related fields.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of antibiotics on the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on efficacy of antibiotics on the outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors from inception to August 1st, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 27 cohort studies involving 7 087 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that antibiotic use was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=2.04, 95%CI 1.68 to 2.49, P<0.000 01) and progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.63, 95%CI 1.35 to 1.99, P<0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that antibiotic use is associated with poor OS and PFS. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the antitumor effect of tumor vaccine fused from dendritic cells (DC) and Walker-256 cancer cells on implanted liver cancer in rats and the related mechanism of inhibition for tumor angiogenesis. MethodsWalker-256 cancer cells and mature DC were fused by 50% polyethylene glycol method for preparation of DC-Walker-256 fusion vaccines. Implanted liver cancer models were established through operations on healthy male SD rats at the age of 6－8 weeks. All the rats were divided into four groups, and rats in each group were injected subcutanely with fusion vaccine (group), mixed cultured cells (group), simple DC (group), and PBS (blank control group), respectively. On 28 d after making model, the rats were put to death, the tumor was observed and pathological essays were prepared. All rats’ spleens were collected and prepared into lymphocyte to detect antigenic specificity cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) by enzymelinked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) method. The expressions of VEGF, ANG-1, ANG-2, and MVD were detected by immunohistochemistry. ResultsThe numbers of rats survived in the fusion vaccine group, mixed culture cells group, simple DC group, and blank control group was 8, 5, 6, and 3, respectively. The rats in the other three groups except for fusion vaccine group were manifested as inaction, anorexia, and gloomy fur in some degree as well as ascites. The tumorigenesis was found in all survival rats except for two in the fusion vaccine group. The weight of liver tumors of rats in the fusion vaccine group 〔(32.4±9.2) g〕 was significantly lighter than that in the mixed culture cells group 〔(67.3±5.1) g, P=0.031〕, simple DC group 〔(75.0±8.3) g, P=0.019〕, and blank control group 〔(86.6±10.5) g, P=0.008〕, respectively. The number of tumorspecific CTL of rats in the fusion vaccine group was also significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P=0.019, P=0.025, and P=0.001, respectively). The MVD of tumor tissue in the fusion vaccine group was (24.12±2.32) vessels/HP, which was significantly lower than that in the mixed culture cells group 〔(40.34±1.29) vessels/HP, P=0.025〕, simple DC group 〔(42.36±3.16) vessels/HP, P=0.035〕, and blank control group 〔(56.48±5.16) vessels/HP, P=0.006〕, respectively. The MVD of tumor tissue in the mixed cultured cells group and simple DC group was similar (P=0.165), however, which was significantly lower than that in the blank control group (P=0.040 and P=0.043). The positive rate of VEGFA protein expression was 23.2% in the fusion vaccine group, which was significantly lower than that in the mixed culture cells group (42.5%, P=0.031), simple DC group (61.3%, P=0.019), and blank control group (89.6%, P=0.003), respectively. The positive rate of VEGF-A protein expression in the mixed cultured cells and simple DC groups was similar (P=0.089), however, which was significantly lower than that in the blank control group (P=0.027 and P=0.038). The positive rate of ANG-1 protein expression in the fusion vaccine group (43.2%) was not different from that in the mixed culture cells group (46.3%, P=0.292), simple DC group (51.3%, P=0.183), or blank control group (49.6%, P=0.179), respectively, and the difference of pairwise comparison in latter three groups was not significant (P=0.242, P=0.347, and P=0.182). The positive rate of ANG2 protein expression was 19.2% in the fusion vaccine group, which was significantly lower than that in the mixed culture cells group (62.3%, P=0.007), simple DC group (67.3%, P=0.005), and blank control group (71.6%, P=0.004), respectively, however, the difference of pairwise comparison in latter three groups was not significant (P=0.634, P=0.483, and P=0.379). ConclusionFused vaccine can induce CD8+ CTL aiming at tumor cells and establish the effective antitumor immunity in vivo and also downregulate the level of VEGF and ANG-2 to suppress tumor angiogenesis and thereby achieve the purpose of curing tumor.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the clinical response rate of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor modified-T cells (CD19CART) in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect cohort studies about CD19CART in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies from 2000 to 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, a single rate meta-analysis was performed by R software and SPSS 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 13 prospective cohort studies were included. The results of single group rate meta-analysis showed that the overall pooled response rate of CD19 CART was 68% (95%CI 0.51 to 0.82). The 6 months and 1-year PFS after CD19 CART infused by Kaplan-Meier were 46% (95%CI 0.35 to 0.56) and 24% (95%CI 0.16 to 0.34), respectively. The median duration was 180 days (95%CI 138 to 222). The COX regression model showed lymphodepletion to be the only influence factor of PFS.ConclusionsCD19 CART has a good clinical response rate in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies. Lymphodepletion is the only important impact on the response rate and PFS. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
Cancer immunotherapy refers to the therapeutic effect of controlling or eliminating tumor cells by interfering with the immune system to restore the anti-tumor immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy that blocks programmed death -1/programmed cell death ligand-1/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 is one of the most commonly used tumor immunotherapies, with good efficacy and wide application. These drugs cause immune-related ocular complications such as uveitis, autoimmune retinopathy, and scleritis, which represent a new etiology of ocular inflammation. The ophthalmologist's grasp of the clinical characteristics of these diseases is helpful for timely diagnosis. At the same time, the ophthalmologist will work closely with the oncologist to make a comprehensive judgment based on the patient's primary tumor, survival prognosis, severity of adverse reactions related to ocular immunotherapy, and visual prognosis, and develop suitable therapeutic strategie, thereby saving the patients' vision and improving the quality of life.
It is very limited that the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the 5-year survival rate is only 5% higher than surgery. Antibodies that block programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 significantly improve the survival of advanced NSCLC. The value of immunotherapy in early NSCLC is also being explored. This paper firstly summarized and analyzed the progress of immunotherapy in the perioperative period of NSCLC. Secondly, the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy were discussed. Finally, the clinical value of different therapeutic efficacy prediction indicators was summarized, in order to clarify the current status of immunotherapy in the perioperative period, so as to improve the clinical benefits of early NSCLC patients.
Tumor immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy. Immunotherapy, as the main systemic treatment for advanced malignant tumors, kills tumor cells by activating the immune system and prolongs the survival of patients. However, excessive immune responses can cause immune-related adverse events (irAE), causing damage to systemic tissues. ICI are the main tumor immunotherapy drugs that cause optic nerve irAE. The most common optic nerve irAE are optic neuritis, only a few patients appeared arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Sudden painless loss of bilateral vision is the most common clinical manifestation. In severe cases, the vision decrease to no light perception. Early diagnosis and early adequate glucocorticoid treatment can improve the symptoms. Therefore, neuro-ophthalmologists and oncologists should know the clinical characteristics of optic nerve irAE, in order to diagnose and treat early and improve the prognosis.
Objective To review the advance in the experimental studies and evaluate the potential therapeutic application of the mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs). Methods The related articles published in China and theother countries during the recent years were extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The MSCs were widely used in the cell-transplantation therapy and the tissue engineering because of their pluripotency of differentiation into various kinds of cells. They were also frequently used in the gene therapy because they could stably express the transfected objective genes. Because of their immunomodulatory function, the MSCs could also be used in the immunotherapy. Conclusion The MSCs are the stem cells, which have characteristics of renewing themselves, having multipotency, and being easy to undergo amplification in vitro.The MSCs are ideal target cells for the cell therapy, tissue engineering, gene therapy, and immunotherapy.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the incidence of adverse skin reactions in lung cancer patients treated by immunotherapy. MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the studies on the incidence of skin adverse reactions in lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy from June 2011 to June 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 63 studies were included, with a total sample size of 13 386 cases. The results of meta-analysis showed that the overall incidence of adverse skin reactions in lung cancer patients was 14.0% (95%CI 11.6% to 16.5%). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the incidence of adverse skin reactions in lung cancer patients with immunotherapy is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo generally analyze the current situations and advancement of the study on immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. MethodsThe pertinent published papers about the current situation and research advancement of the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer were retrospectively investigated. And also the immunogenicity and the varying principles of immunoresistance, the functional targets, the practicality, and some other characteristics of different immunotherapy for colorectal cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe main treatments and the research focuses in the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer are initiative nonspecific immunotherapy, adoptive immunotherapy, monoclonal antibody immunotherapy, initiative specific immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. They work by fighting against the cancer itself, cutting off the tumor’s nutrition supply, activating the immune system specifically or breaking the immune tolerance and so on. Though there are still many problems unsolved, immunotherapy has a promising clinical prospect. ConclusionAs a beneficial complement for surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy， immunotherapy plays an important auxiliary role in the combined therapy for colorectal cancer.