Objective To evaluate the treatment results of LCP and locked intramedullary nailing for tibial diaphysis fractures.MethodsFrom October 2003 to April 2006, 55 patients with tibial diaphysis fractures ( 58 fractures) were treated. Of them there were 39 males and 16 females with an average of 39 years years ( 14 to 62 years). The fractures were on the left side in 27 patients and on the right side in 31 patients (3 patients had bilateral involvement). Thirtyfour fractures were treated by intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nailing group) and 24 fractures by LCP fixation (LCP group). The average disease course was 3 days (intramedullary nailing group) and 3.1 days(LCP group). The operation time, the range of motion of knee and ankle joints, fracturehealing time, and complications were evaluated. Results The patients were followed up 8-26 months(13 months on average). The operation time was 84.0±9.2 min (intramedullary nailing group) and 69.0±8.4 min (LCPgroup)； the average cost in hospital was￥19 297.78 in the intramedullary nailing group and ￥14 116.55 in the LCP group respectively, showing significant differences(P＜0.05). The flexion and extension of knee joint was 139.0±3.7° and 4.0±0.7° in intramedullary nailing group and 149.0±4.2° and 0±0.4° in LCP group, showing no significant difference(Pgt;0.05). The doral flexion and plantar flexion of ankle joint were 13.0±1.7° and 41.0±2.6° in intramedullary nailing group, and 10.0±1.4° and 44.0±2.3° in LCP group, showing nosignificant differences(Pgt;0.05). The mean healing time was 3.3 months in intramedullary nailing group, and 3.1 months in LCP group. Length discrepancy occurred in 1 case (2.5 cm), delayed union in 1 case and nailing endtrouble in 3 cases in intramedullary nailing group; moreover rotation deformityoccurred 1 case and anterior knee pain occurred in 6 cases(17.1%). One angulation and open fracture developed osteomyelitis in 1 case 1 week postoperatively and angulation deformity occurred in 1 case of distalthird tibial fractures in LCP group. Conclusion LCP and locked intramedullary nailing can achieve satisfactory results in treating tibial diaphysis fracture LCP has advantages in less complication, operation time and cost in hospital.
目的:探討輔助后內側切口及抗滑鋼板治療復雜脛骨平臺骨折的臨床療效。方法:對我院2006年4月至2008年12月的28例復雜脛骨平臺骨折病患(男19例,女9例,平均年齡37歲)進行輔助后內側切口及抗滑鋼板的臨床手術治療。結果:術后隨訪,24例效果良好,4例出現不良反應,經修復后愈合。結論:術后關節功能及切口恢復良好,外側支撐鋼板+后內側抗滑鋼板的雙切口雙鋼板的手術方法是治療復雜脛骨平臺骨折安全、有效的方法,故在臨床上有推廣價值,但有待大規模病例來驗證。
Objective To analyze the characteristics of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged adults by means of medical image analysis and fracture mapping technology to provide reference for fracture treatment. Methods A clinical data of 159 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures who were admitted between December 2018 and July 2019 was analyzed. Among them, 99 patients were male and 60 were female. The age ranged from 18 to 60 years, with an average age of 47.9 years. There were 77 cases of left femoral neck fractures and 82 cases of right sides. Based on preoperative X-ray film and CT, the fracture morphology was observed and classified according to the Garden classification standard and Pauwels’ angle, respectively. Mimics19.0 software was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional models of femoral neck fracture, measure the angle between the fracture plane and the sagittal plane of the human body, and observe whether there was any defect at the fracture end and its position on the fracture surface. Through reconstruction, virtual reduction, and image overlay, the fracture map was established to observe the fracture line and distribution. Results According to Garden classification standard, there were 6 cases of type Ⅰ, 61 cases of type Ⅱ, 54 cases of type Ⅲ, and 38 cases of type Ⅳ. According to the Pauwels’ angle, there were 12 cases of abduction type, 78 cases of intermediate type, and 69 cases of adduction type. The angle between fracture plane and sagittal plane of the human body ranged from –39° to +30°. Most of them were Garden type Ⅱ, Ⅳ and Pauwels intermediate type. The fracture blocks were mainly in the form of a triangle with a long base and mainly distributed below the femoral head and neck junction area. Twenty-six cases (16.35%) were complicated with bone defects, which were mostly found in Garden type Ⅲ, Ⅳ, and Pauwels intermediate type, located at the back of femoral neck and mostly involved 2-4 quadrants. The fracture map showed that the fracture line of the femoral neck was distributed annularly along the femoral head and neck junction. The fracture line was dense above the femoral neck and scattered below, involving the femoral calcar. Conclusion The proportion of displaced fractures (Garden type Ⅲ, Ⅳ) and unstable fractures (Pauwels intermediate type, adduction type) is high in femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged adults, and comminuted fractures and bone defects further increase the difficulty of treatment. In clinical practice, it is necessary to choose treatment plan according to fracture characteristics. Anatomic reduction and effective fixation are the primary principles for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged adults.
ObjectiveTo review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.ConclusionCompared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.