ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic risk factors for patients with gram positive coccus bloodstream infections. MethodsBy retrospective analysis, 93 patients with gram positive coccus bloodstream infections were recruited from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital during January 2013 to April 2015.According to the 28-day survival situation, the patients were divided into a survival group and a death group.The clinical data including basic diseases and invasive operation were collected.Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for predicting prognosis. ResultsThe albumin concentration in the death group was lower than that in the survival group (P < 0.05).The D-Dimer concentration, APACHEⅡscores, the percentage of patients with mechanical ventilation, and the percentage of patients with deep venous cannels in the death group were all higher than those in the survival group (P < 0.05).The percentages with diabetes mellitus, surgery, tumor, renal failure in the patients with enterococcus bloodstream infections were much higher than those patients with other gram positive coccus bloodstream infections (P < 0.05), but were not different with those patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (P > 0.05).The APACHEⅡscore and albumin concentration had statistical significance for predicting the 28-day and 90-day mortality.The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.768 and 0.775.If using APACHEⅡscore > 22.5 as cut off value for predicting death in 28 days, the sensitivity was 70.0%, and the specificity was 81.2%.If Using albumin concentration < 32.5 g/L as a cutoff value for predicting death in 28 days, the sensitivity was 55.3%, and the specificity was 86.7%. The logistic multifactor analysis revealed only the lower albumin concentration was an independent prognostic factor for 28-day mortality of the patients with gram positive coccus bloodstream infections (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe patients with diabetes mellitus, surgery, tumor, and renal failure need to be cautious of enterococcus bloodstream infection.The low albumin concentration suggests a poor prognosis in patients with gram positive coccus bloodstream infections.
Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and bacterial drug resistance of bloodstream infection of gram-negative bacteria, and provide guidance for clinical rational drug use and control of hospital infection. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in the patients diagnosed as severe pneumonia with blood culture of gram-negative bacteria from January 2015 to December 2017 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Results A total of 60 severe pneumonia patients suffered from bloodstream infection of gram-negative bacteria were recruited including 34 males and 26 females aging from 42 to 89 years and 73.4 years in average. In the 60 patients, 32 cases were infected with Klebsiella pneumonias, 20 cases were infected with Acinetobacter baumanni, and 8 cases were infected with Escherichia coli. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing result of Klebsiella pneumonias showed that the drug susceptibility rate was 100% to tigecycline, and 6.3% to amikacin. Escherichia coli was sensitive to Amikacin, imipenem, ceftazidime and meropenem while resistance to other drugs. The antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter baumanni was 28.6% for cefoperazone/sulbactam, and 14.3% for tigecycline. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and SOFA scores were higher in the patients infected with Acinetobacter baumanni. Neutrophils and blood lactic acid were higher in the patients infected with Klebsiella pneumonias. There were no statistical differences in white blood cell, platelet or motality rate between the patients infected with Acinetobacter baumanni and the patients infected with Klebsiella pneumonias. SOFA scores and blood lactic acid had significantly statistical relevance with prognosis. Conclusion There is a high proportion of drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanni in the bloodstream infection of gram-negative bacteria.
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic risk factors of bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in the hospital, to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of patients diagnosed with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People’s Hospital between January 2013 and December 2018. The patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group according to the outcome within 30 days after blood culture was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify the risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections.ResultsA total of 123 patients were included, including 48 in the survival group and 75 in the non-survival group. Third generation cephalosporins [odds ratio (OR)=2.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.125, 2.924), P<0.001], carbapenems [OR=1.721, 95%CI (1.505, 1.969), P<0.001], multidrug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii infection [OR=1.240, 95%CI (1.063, 1.446), P=0.006], post-operation [OR=0.515, 95%CI (0.449, 0.590), P<0.001], mechanical ventilation [OR=1.182, 95%CI (1.005, 1.388), P=0.043], indwelling central venous catheter [OR=0.116, 95%CI (0.080, 0.169), P<0.001], mixed infection or septic shock [OR=3.935, 95%CI (2.740, 5.650), P<0.001], APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15) [OR=5.939, 95%CI (5.029, 7.013), P<0.001], chronic kidney disease [OR=1.440, 95%CI (1.247, 1.662), P<0.001], immune system disease [OR=28.620, 95%CI (17.087, 47.937), P<0.001], use of corticosteroids [OR=0.520, 95%CI (0.427, 0.635), P<0.001], and combined antifungal agents [OR=0.814, 95%CI (0.668, 0.992), P=0.041] were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.ConclusionsThe third generation cephalosporins, carbapenem, MDR-Acinetobacter baumannii infection, post-operation, mechanical ventilation, indwelling central venous catheter, mixed infection or septic shock, APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15), chronic kidney disease, immune system disease, use of corticosteroids, and combined antifungal agents were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. In the clinical work, it is needed to carry out timely detection of microbial etiology, timely report, and reasonable treatment.
Objective To analyze the characteristics of pathogens causing bloodstream infection (BSI) after cardiovascular surgery, and provide instructions for prevention and treatment of such kind of disease. Methods A retrospective investigation of clinical and pathogenic data of the patients suffering from BSI after cardiovascular surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to December 2016 was performed. There were 61 patients with 36 males and 25 females at average age of 48.2±17.1 years. A percentage of 65.6% (40/61) of the underlying diseases was rheumatic heart disease. Results Sixty-five strains were isolated from the blood culture specimens of the 61 patients. Gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria and fungi isolates accounted for 56.9% (37/65), 35.4% (23/65), and 7.7% (5/65), respectively. Among these isolates, Streptococcus spp. was predominant (19/65, 29.2%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (8/65, 12.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (6/65, 9.2%), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus- A. baumannii (5/65, 7.7%) and Escherichia coli (5/65, 7.7%). The resistance rate of Streptococcus spp. to erythromycin and clindamycin was 73.4% (14/19) and 63.2% (12/19), while its resistance to cefepime, vancomycin or linezolid was not observed. Staphylococcus spp. showed the resistance rate of 71.4% (10/14) to oxacillin. All of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates were multidrug resistant (5/5, 100.0%), and 80.0% (4/5) of them were resistant to imipenem. The isolates producing extended spectrum beta-lactamase accounted for 80.0% (4/5) of E. coli. Conclusion Streptococcus spp. was the common pathogen causing BSI after cardiovascular surgery. Staphylococcus spp. and gram-negative bacilli show high resistance.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and provide clinical guidance for reducing the incidence of CLABSI. Methods The clinical data of patients with central venous catheter catheterization in Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected. According to whether CLABSI occurred, the patients were divided into CLABSI group and non-CLABSI group. The data of patients were analyzed and the risk factors of CLABIS were discussed. Results A total of 43 987 patients were included. Among them, there were 63 cases in the CLABSI group and 43924 cases in the non-CLABSI group. The incidence of CLABSI was 0.18/1 000 catheter days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that admission to intensive care unit (ICU) [odds ratio (OR)=74.054, 95% confidence interval (CI) (22.661, 242.005), P<0.001], hemodialysis [OR=4.531, 95%CI (1.899, 10.809), P=0.001] and indwelling catheter days [OR=1.017, 95%CI (1.005, 1.029), P=0.005] were independent risk factors for CLABSI. A total of 63 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated from the 63 patients with CLABSI. Among them, 28 strains of Gram-positive bacteria, 25 strains of Gram-negative bacteria and 10 strains of Candida. Conclusions Admission to ICU, hemodialysis and long-term indwelling catheter are independent risk factors for CLABSI. The prevention and control measures of CLABSI should be strictly implemented for such patients to reduce the risk of infection.
Objective To explore the vascular access infection (VAI) incidence of hemodialysis patients during the the maximum spread of the COVID-19 epidemic (epidemic period) compared with the corresponding period with no local cases of COVID-19 (control period). Methods A single-center, retrospective study was carried out. Adult patients who underwent hemodialysis at the Department of Blood Purification Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University during the epidemic period between December 7, 2022 and February 23, 2023 and the control period between December 7, 2020 and February 23, 2021 were selected. The incidence of local access site infection (LASI) and access related bloodstream infection (ARBSI) in included patients were observed and compared. ResultsA total of 1 401 patients were included. Among them, there were 737 cases during the epidemic period and 664 cases during the control period. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, and duration of catheterization among patients of different periods and pathway types (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of LASI between the epidemic period and the control period (χ2=1.800, P=1.180). There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ARBSI between the epidemic period and the control period [χ2=4.610, relative risk (RR)=2.575, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.053, 6.298), P=0.032]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of LASI and ARBSI at different stages in patients with arteriovenous fistula and unnel-cuffed catheters (TCC) (P＞0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of LASI [χ2=4.898, RR=3.832, 95%CI (1.058, 13.885), P=0.027] and ARBSI [χ2=7.150, RR=4.684, 95%CI (1.333, 16.460), P=0.005] among non cuffed catheters (NCC) patients at different stages. TCC patients might experience LASI (P<0.05) during the epidemic period and ARBSI (P<0.05) during the control period compared with the arteriovenous fistula patients; both central venous catheterization and NCC patients might experience LASI and ARBSI during the control period (P<0.05). Conclusion Targeting COVID-19 prevention may be associated with the reduction of vascular access infection in hemodialysis patients, in particular in NCC patients.