Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of sufentanil combined with propofol for painless fiberbronchoscopy. Methods A total of 120 patients undergoing fiberbronchoscopy were divided into two groups according to their admission sequence: group S (sufentanil + propofol, n=60) and group F (fentanil + propofol, n=60). Parameters including heart rate (HR), systol ic blood pressure (SBP), diastol ic blood pressure (DBP), saturation of blood oxygen (SPO2), dose of propofol, duration of the procedure, waking time and score of Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale were recorded. Results The HR increased significantly 3 minutes after drug administration in both groups (Plt;0.05). The SPO2 decreased significantly 3 minutes after drug administration in both groups (Plt;0.05). The average dose of propofol and OAA/a score were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The waking time was significantly shorter in group S than in group F (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil combined with propofol could offer a good sedative/analgesic effect during painless fiberbronchoscopy.
目的 觀察右美托咪啶復合舒芬太尼用于經腹子宮全切術后患者自控靜脈鎮痛（PCIA）的效果。 方法 2011年3月－2012年6月選擇經腹子宮全切術患者90例，年齡39～68歲，體重48～72 kg，美國麻醉醫師協會分級Ⅰ～Ⅱ級。采用隨機數字表法，將患者隨機分為3組，每組各30例。于手術結束即刻行PCIA。對照組（C組）采用舒芬太尼150 μg+昂丹司瓊12 mg；S1組采用右美托咪定200 μg+舒芬太尼100 μg+昂丹司瓊12 mg；S2組采用右美托咪定200 μg+舒芬太尼150 μg+昂丹司瓊12 mg。3組均用生理鹽水稀釋至100 mL，負荷劑量均為舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg，靜脈鎮痛泵背景輸注速度2 mL/h，自控給藥劑量0.5 mL，鎖定時間15 min。記錄術后6、12、24和48 h Ramsay鎮靜評分和視覺模擬評分（VAS），記錄不良反應發生情況和患者對術后鎮痛的滿意度。 結果 3組患者均能獲得較好的鎮痛效果。其中C組VAS評分較低，但惡心、嘔吐、皮膚瘙癢發生率升高；與C組相比，Sl組和S2組Ramsay鎮靜評分升高，惡心、嘔吐、皮膚瘙癢發生率降低，患者滿意度升高。S1組患者滿意度最高；S2組VAS評分最低。3組均未發生心動過緩、低血壓、過度鎮靜和呼吸抑制。 結論 右美托咪啶可增加經腹子宮全切術患者術后舒芬太尼自控靜脈鎮痛的效果，提高患者滿意度，降低不良反應。
目的:觀察舒芬太尼復合異丙酚自控鎮靜鎮痛在結腸鏡檢查中的效果及不良反應,從而探討該方法的安全性和有效性。方法:行無痛纖維結腸鏡檢查的患者60例,隨機分為兩組:自控鎮痛/鎮靜組和靜脈復合全麻醉組,每組30例。自控鎮痛/鎮靜組首先緩慢靜脈注射舒芬太尼0.12 μg/kg,隨之接電子自控鎮痛泵,負荷量設定為0.5 mg/kg,以4 mg/kg·h的速度持續泵入異丙酚(10 mg/mL),術中按壓1次自控手柄可快速推注異丙酚1 mL。靜脈復合全麻醉組首先靜脈緩慢推注芬太尼1 μg/kg,咪唑安定0.02 mg/kg, 2 min后緩慢推注異丙酚0.8～1 mg/kg。術中間斷給予異丙酚以維持聽覺誘發電位指數(AAI)于30～40之間。結果:靜脈復合全麻醉組的MAP較檢查前明顯下降且較自控鎮痛/鎮靜組下降更為明顯且具有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。自控鎮痛/鎮靜組的呼吸頻率較靜脈復合全麻醉組下降明顯且在T3時間點具有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。自控鎮痛/鎮靜組患者OAA/S評分達5分和Aldrete評分達9分的時間均較靜脈復合全麻醉組明顯縮短(1.4±1.3 VS 3.9±1.7和 2.9±1.7 VS 5.7±1.7)(Plt;0.05)。兩組的內鏡醫師和患者滿意度評分無統計學差異(P＞0.05)。結論:自控鎮靜鎮痛能夠比傳統的靜脈全身麻醉提供更良好的循環系統穩定性,更迅速的麻醉后恢復,是結腸鏡檢查鎮靜鎮痛的理想和安全方法。
【摘要】 目的 觀察依托咪酯乳劑復合舒芬太尼用于全麻下喉罩置入的血流動力學變化。 方法 選擇2009年4月-2010年2月間，46例需全麻手術、適合使用喉罩，美國麻醉醫師協會（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅱ級，年齡18～60歲的患者，隨機分為兩組:依托咪酯乳劑組（E組）23 例，靜脈推注咪達唑侖0.05 mg/kg，依托咪酯乳劑0.3 mg/kg；依托咪酯乳劑+舒芬太尼組（ES組）23 例，靜脈推注咪達唑侖0.05 mg/kg，依托咪酯乳劑0.15 mg/kg，加舒芬太尼0.5 mg/kg，誘導后置入喉罩，記錄患者誘導前、用藥后1 min、喉罩置入后1 min的心率（HR）、平均動脈壓（MAP）以及評估喉罩置入條件的6項指標（張口困難分級、置入喉罩困難分級、舌咽反射、干咳干嘔反射、肢動反應及喉痙攣分級），同時記錄呼吸暫停時間。 結果 ES組能提供更好的喉罩置入條件，且能減少舌咽反射和肢體反應， 更能保證喉罩置入時血流動力學的穩定。 結論 依托咪酯乳劑復合舒芬太尼能為全麻喉罩置入時提供更好的條件，且能保證更好的血流動力學穩定。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the hemodynamics changes when etomidate combined with sufentanil was applied for laryngeal mask airway insertion under the general anaesthesia. Methods From April 2009 to February 2010, 46 patients requiring general anesthesia using laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅱ) aged 18-60 were randomly divided into two groups: 23 in etomidate emulsion group (group E) underwent the intravenous injection with midazolm (0.3 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.05 mg/kg); 23 in etomidate emulsion + sufentanil group (group ES) underwent the intravenous injection with etomidate (0.15 mg/kg), midazolm (0.05 mg/kg), and sufentanil 0.5 mg/kg. The patients were evaluated by six indexes of LMA insertion (mouth opening, swallowing reflex, cough reflex,vomiting reflex, body motion, and laryngospasm classification). After the anesthesia induction, LMA was inserted. The blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before anesthesia induction one minute after the injection and one minute after LMA insertion. Meanwhile, the apnea time was recorded. Results Compared with group E, group ES offered better anesthesia for LMA insertion, less swallowing reflex and body motion, and more stable haemodynamics. Conclusion Etomidate combined with sufentanil provides good condition for LMA insertion under the general anaesthesia with steady haemodynamics.
【摘要】 目的 比較舒芬太尼與等效劑量芬太尼在髖關節置換術后患者硬膜外鎮痛的臨床效果。 方法 2006年11月-2008年9月收治的50例硬膜外麻醉下髖關節置換術患者，隨機分為兩組（n=25）。芬太尼組（A組）:芬太尼0.75 mg加0.894%甲磺酸哌卡因20 mL加生理鹽水至100 mL；舒芬太尼組（B組），舒芬太尼75 μg加0.894%甲磺酸哌卡因20 mL加生理鹽水至100 mL硬膜外鎮痛。其中，A組患者于手術結束時，靜脈滴注格拉司瓊3 mg。持續劑量2 mL/h，單次給藥量（PCA）0.5 mL/次，鎖定時間15 min。觀察兩組的鎮痛效果，惡心、嘔吐次數，記錄脈搏血氧飽和度、心率、呼吸的變化。 結果 鎮痛泵開機后，B組各時段鎮靜評分，2分以上者明顯多于A組，鎮痛評分明顯低于A組，有統計學意義（Plt;0.05），兩組術后惡心、嘔吐發生率都較低，組間差異無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。兩組4、12、24 h的呼吸頻率和脈搏血氧飽和度差異有統計學意義（Plt;0.05），但48 h的呼吸頻率和脈搏血氧飽和度無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。 結論 在等效劑量下，髖關節置換術后患者硬膜外鎮痛，舒芬太尼明顯優于芬太尼。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical effect of epidural analgesia with sufentanil and fentanyl in an equivalent dose after hip replacement. Methods From December 2006 to September 2008, fifty cases of epidural anesthesia after hip replacement were randomly divided into two groups, each group had 25 cases. Group A (fentanyl group): fentanyl mesylate 0.75 mg+0.894% ropivacaine 20 mL+0.9% sodium chloride solution to 100 mL; group B (sufentanil group): sufentanil 75 μg+0.894% ropivacaine mesylate 20 mL+0.9% sodium chloride solution to 100 mL epidural analgesia. Patients in group A received intravenous infusion of granisetron 3 mg at the end of surgery. Continuous dose was 2 mL/h, with the volume of single dose (PCA) 0.5 mL per time and lockout time of 15 minutes. The analgesic effect, nausea, and vomiting frequency were observed, and the pulse oxygen saturation, heart rate, and breathing changes were recorded. Results After boot analgesia, S sedation scores for each phase and pain score in group B were significantly different compared with those in group A (Plt;0.05). Both groups had low incidence of nausea and vomiting, and the difference was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). The difference of respiratory rate and pulse oxygen saturation at 4 h, 12 h, 24 h was statistically significant between two groups (Plt;0.05), but at 48 h the difference was not significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion In the equivalent dose, epidural analgesia with sufentanil in the patients with hip replacement is superior to fentanyl.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with dezocine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients after radical operation for abdominal tumor. MethodsBetween September 2012 and May 2013, 60 patients (aged 40-60, American Sociaty of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅱ) undergoing abdominal tumor surgery and asking for PCIA pumps voluntarily were randomly divided into two groups (group D and group DF) with 30 in each group. Patients in group D were given sufentanil 0.25 μg/kg+ dezocine 0.4 mg/kg, which were added into 100 mL 0.9% normal saline, while in group DF, the patients received dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg+ sufentanil 0.15 μg/kg+ dezocine 0.4 mg/kg, which were added into 100 mL 0.9% normal saline. The changes of mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), the visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation scale, Bruggrmann analgesia scale (BCS), the efficacy of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects were observed and recorded at the preoperative time (T0), and 2 (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), 24 (T4) and 48 hours (T5) postoperatively. ResultsHemodynamics in group DF was more stable than that in group D (P<0.05). There were no statically significant differences in terms of VAS and BCS between the two groups at each time point (P>0.05). The Ramsay sedation scale of group DF was better than group D, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The efficient number of pressing within 48 hours in the two groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and drowsiness in group D was more than that of group DF (P<0.05). ConclusionDexmedetomidine combined with dezocine can provide effective postoperative analgesia with less adverse effects for patients after radical surgery of abdominal tumor, which provides higher satisfaction to the abdominal surgery patients.
Objective To investigate clinical application and safety evaluation of sedative demulcent anesthesia in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods Totally 1660 patients underwent ERCP at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were prospectively divided into two groups: venous sedative demulcent group (n=800, using sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion) and conventional sedative demulcent group (n=860, using common medicine). The heart rate (HR), respiration (R), blood pressure (BP) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of pre-anesthesia, post-anesthesia, during operation and after analepsia in every group were detected. The narcotism was evaluated by Ramsaymin grading method and the related adverse reactions such as cough, restlessness, harmful memory, and abdominal pain after operation were recorded. Results Compared with conventional sedative demulcent group, vital signs of patients in venous sedative demulcent group were more stable. For postoperative adverse reactions, abdominal pain, abdominal distension and nausea and vomiting were respectively 4.4%(35/800), 2.6%(21/800) and 3.6%(29/800) in venous sedative demulcent group, which were respectively higher of the incidence of 36.3%(312/860), 49.0%(421/860) and 53.0%(456/860) in conventional sedative demulcent group (P＜0.01). The postoperative satisfaction and adverse reactions recall between venous sedative demulcent group and conventional sedative demulcent group was respectively significant different (96.9% vs. 2.9%, 4.8% vs. 97.9%, P＜0.01). Conclusion Sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion have good effect of sedative demulcent anesthesia, which can be widely used.
目的:比較舒芬太尼與芬太尼復合七氟烷麻醉在神經外科手術中對血流動力學、拔管時間、蘇醒時間及術后疼痛情況的影響。方法:擇期開顱手術患者60例,隨機分為舒芬太尼(S)組和芬太尼(F)組,每組30例。將S和F的效能比定為10:l,復合咪唑安定、維庫溴胺、異丙酚來進行麻醉誘導;麻醉維持均復合七氟烷。分別記錄麻醉前、誘導后、插管時和拔管時血壓和心率變化;呼吸恢復、睜眼和拔管時間以及拔管后半小時疼痛評分(VAS評分)。結果:兩組麻醉誘導后收縮壓(SBP)、舒張壓(DBP)、心率(HR)均較誘導前有顯著性下降(Plt;0．05)。F組插管及拔管時,血流動力學變化均較S組有顯著性升高(Plt;0.05)。S組蘇醒期呼吸恢復、睜眼、拔管時間較F組明顯縮短;拔管后半小時疼痛評分(VAS評分)S組低于F組。結論:與芬太尼相比,等效劑量的舒芬太尼用于腦外科手術患者麻醉誘導可更有效地減輕全麻誘導氣管插管時的心血管反應;在麻醉蘇醒期,更有利于呼吸管理及術后鎮痛。舒芬太尼在神經外科麻醉中具有很好的臨床應用價值。
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl used in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.MethodsAn online search of computerized searches of the database of MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and SinoMed were conducted. Randomized controlled trials published since the inceptions of these databases until April 1st 2018, involving the comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl for PCIA after cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the fentanyl group, the sufentanil group had statistically significant lower VAS scores at 4-hour (MD=–0.99, 95%CI –1.03 to –0.95, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.40 to –0.21, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=–0.54, 95%CI –0.62 to –0.46, P<0.001) and 24-hour (MD=–0.35, 95%CI –0.41 to –0.28, P<0.001); statistically significant higher Ramsay scores at 4-hour (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.78, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=0.93, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=0.98, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.05, P<0.001), 24-hour (MD=0.07, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11, P=0.000 5), 48-hour (MD=0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, P<0.000 1). As for the adverse reactions, sufentanil group had lower risks of having nausea and vomiting (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.31, P<0.001), pruritus (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.001), dizziness (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.44, P<0.001) and urinary retention (RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.15, 0.82), P=0.02).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that, sufentanil has better analgesia and sedative effects, and less risks of adverse reactions for safer clinical use.