Objective To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique for ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods Sixty-nine young and middle-aged patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures were treated between January 2000 and August 2010, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. Of them, fractures were fixed by reconstruction nail in 44 cases (reconstruction nail group) and by PFNA in 25 cases (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, injury cause, fracture type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, complications, and functional outcomes were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time and blood loss in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the reconstruction nail group (P lt; 0.05). The follow-up time was 12-38 months (mean, 20 months ) in the PFNA group and was 12-48 months (mean, 22 months) in the reconstruction nail group. No complication occurred as follows in 2 groups: wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, breakage of the implants, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or serious rotation and shortening deformity of lower limbs. In the PFNA group and the reconstruction nail group, 1 patient underwent technical difficulty in nail implant and 7 patients underwent technical difficulty in proximal locking screw, respectively; 3 patients and 6 patients had intra-operative iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft, respectively; and delayed union of femoral shaft was observed in 1 patient and 2 patients, respectively. The complication rate was 20% (5/25) in the PFNA group and 34% (15/44) in the reconstruction nail group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.538, P=0.215). No significant difference was found in fracture healing time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and Evanich knee score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion PFNA or reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique is a good method to treat ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures, but the PFNA is superior to the reconstruction nail because of simple operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the biomechanical influence of the oblique locking plate on the fixation of femoral shaft fracture. MethodsForty imitation artificial femur model with mechanical properties similar to human femur were selected and randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D, 10 in each group; the femur fracture model was made by transverse osteotomy at 15 cm and 17 cm below the lesser trochanter of the femur and fixed with locking plate with 12 holes and cortical bone screws. The plate was placed in the middle of the longitudinal axis of the femur in group A, and was placed at 5, 10, and 15° angle axis in groups B, C, and D respectively. The axial compression, three-point bending, torsion tests were carried out to measure the strain. ResultsWith the compressive load and bending load increasing, the medial and lateral strains were significantly increased in each group (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found in strains under compressive load and bending load among 4 groups (P>0.05). With increasing torque, the strain was significantly increased in each group (P<0.05). At 10 N·m torque, there was no significant difference in the strain values among 4 groups (P>0.05); the strain value was significantly higher in groups C and D than groups A and B (P<0.05) and in group D than group C (P<0.05) at torque of 20 and 50 N·m, but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). ConclusionUnder different stress, the strain will be significantly increased when the plate is placed at >10° angle axis.
The treatment of open reduction and internal fixation was carried out in 480 cases of fractures offemoral shafts. Patients were followed up in an average of 7. 6 years, 50 cases, rate of occurrence of10. 4%, had varying degrees of functional impairment of knee. It was considered that thecharacteristics of fractures, the time of oporation , selection of incision , the types of internal fixationdevices, and the duration of external immobilization were the main causes related to the occurren...
ObjectiveTo review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.ConclusionCompared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness and indications of deferred dynamization for nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after static interlocking nail. MethodsBetween March 2006 and June 2012, 26 patients with nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after static interlocking nail were treated with deferred dynamization, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. There were 19 males and 7 females with a mean age of 38 years (range, 22-46 years). Nonunion was found at 10-29 months (mean, 16 months) after open reduction and static interlocking nail for fracture fixation. Referring to Papakostidis criteria for nonunion, there were 7 cases of stable/hyperplastic type, 3 cases of stable/atrophic type, 12 cases of unstable/hyperplastic type, and 4 cases of unstable/atrophic type. ResultsAll incision healed at first stage. Twenty-six patients were followed up 10-28 months (mean, 14 months). A total of 16 (61.5%) fractures healed at 4-11 months after deferred dynamization (7 cases of stable/hyperplastic type and 9 cases of unstable/hyperplastic type); the other 10 fractures failed to heal. The healing rate was 100% (7/7) in patients with stable/hyperplastic type nonunion, 75% (9/12) in patients with unstable/hyperplastic type nonunion, and 0 in patients with stable/atrophic type and unstable/atrophic type nonunion. ConclusionDeferred dynamization is an effective method for hyperplastic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after static interlocking nail, but it is not suitable for atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures.
Objective To compare the outcomes between intramedullary nail change and augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing, and to analyze the cause so as to guide the clinical application. Methods Between June 2001 and June 2011, 28 patients with aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing were treated with intramedullary nail change (11 patients, group A) and augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail (17 patients, group B), and the clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. There was no significant difference in age, gender, smoking, location of fracture, Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification, type of injury, associated injury, type of nonunion, and time of nonunion between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The patients were followed up by imaging and the clinical function at regular intervals to observe the callus growth and the recovery condition of the affected limb function, and clinical curative effectiveness was evaluated by Tohner-Wrnch standard. Results The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative erythrocyte-transported volume in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volume and hospitalization days between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All the incisions healed by first intention, and no nerve and blood vessel injury occurred. All patients were followed up 18.6 months on average (range, 12-36 months). All cases obtained bone union, and time of clinical and radiological bone healing in group B was significantly shorter than those in group A (P lt; 0.05). During follow-up, no following complication occurred: deep incision infection, injuries of blood vessels and nerves, loosening and breakage of internal fixation, loss of reduction, angulated and rotational malunion. According to Tohner-Wrnch standard at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 3 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.8% in group A; the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100% in group B; and difference was significant between 2 groups (Z= — 2.623, P=0.021). Conclusion Augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail is an ideal treatment for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing and can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes because it has simpler operation, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and less trauma than intramedullary nail change.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of the treatment under the guidance of “diamond concept” for femoral shaft fractures nonunion after intramedullary fixation.MethodsBetween January 2014 and December 2016, 21 cases of femoral shaft fractures nonunion after intramedullary fixation were treated with auxiliary plate fixation combined with autogenous iliac graft, and autologous bone marrow concentrate and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gel under the guidance of the “diamond concept”. There were 13 males and 8 females, with an average age of 32.5 years (range, 17-48 years). All fractures were closed femoral shaft fractures. Four patients underwent internal fixation with plate and resulted in nonunion, then they were fixed with intramedullary nails, but did not heal either. The rest 17 patients were fixed with intramedullary nailing. Fracture nonunion classification: 4 cases of hypertrophic nonunion, 17 cases of atrophic nonunion; the length of bone defect was 1-3 mm; the duration from the last treatment to the current treatment was 10-23 months (mean, 14.3 months). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the time between operation and full loading, fracture healing time, and complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the imaging system of fracture healing of the extremities (RUST) of patients before operation and at last follow-up were recorded to evaluate the fracture healing; the function of the affected limb was evaluated according to the Schatzker-Lambert efficacy score standard at last follow-up.ResultsThe operation time was 105-160 minutes, with an average of 125.6 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 160-580 mL, with an average of 370.5 mL. All incisions healed by first intention, without vascular or nerve injury. All patients were followed up 22-46 months (mean, 26.5 months). All the fractures healed, with a fracture healing time of 3-7 months (mean, 4.8 months). During the follow-up, there was no infection, loosening, implant breakage, re-fracture, and other complications. The VAS score at last follow-up was 0.8±0.3, showing significant difference (t=7.235, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (5.2±3.7); the RUST score was 3.4±0.3, which was significantly higher than the preoperative score (1.5±0.7) (t=8.336, P=0.000). According to the Schatzker-Lambert effectiveness evaluation standard, the limb function was excellent in 16 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 95.42%.ConclusionNonunion after intramedullary fixation of femoral fracture treated with auxiliary plate combined with autogenous iliac graft, autogenous bone marrow concentration and PRP gel in accordance with the “diamond concept” can not only restore the stability of the fracture ends, but also improves the biological environment of the fracture site, and can improve the rate of fracture healing.