ObjectiveTo summarize the results and clinical experience of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation using domestic self-expanding valve in patients with aortic degenerated bio-prosthesis. MethodsFrom January 2019 to April 2023, the patients who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve surgery in the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Tianjin Chest Hospital due to surgical bio-prosthesis failure were included. Characteristics of valves, perioperative complications, and hemodynamic manifestations during the early postoperative and follow-up period were analyzed. ResultsA total of 24 patients were enrolled, including 14 males and 10 females with an average age of 68.17±7.72 years, and the average interval between the two operations was 10.48±4.09 years. All patients were successfully discharged without complications such as coronary artery obstruction and pacemaker implantation, and the average transvalvular pressure gradient was 16.39±6.52 mm Hg before discharge. During the median follow-up time of 16 months, the left ventricular diastolic inner diameter and ejection fraction were continuously improved. ConclusionTranscatheter valve-in-valve using domestic self-expanding valves is safe and feasible to treat aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. Sound patient selection and surgical strategies are critical to achieve good hemodynamics.
We reported a case of a 61-year-old female patient, six years status post her last cardiac surgery, who was admitted with a chief complaint of bilateral lower extremity edema for over a year, which had acutely worsened with associated chest pain for two days. The patient had a complex cardiac surgical history: 12 years prior, she underwent double valve replacement (aortic and mitral) plus tricuspid valvuloplasty for mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. Nine years ago, she underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and vegetation removal for prosthetic valve vegetation with severe regurgitation. Six years ago, she underwent a transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement and mitral balloon valvuloplasty due to prosthetic mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation. Following evaluation during this admission, she successfully underwent a valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR). The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery. This case report aims to explore the clinical strategy and application of the ViV-TAVR technique for managing bioprosthetic valve failure in patients with a history of complex valvular surgeries.
Objective To evaluate the early and middlelongterm clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and compare the relative merit between bioprothesis and mechanical valve in tricuspid position，so as to elevate the operative effect. Methods The data of 128 TVR from April 1992 to February 2008 in An Zhen Hospital were retrospectively reviewed， and classified into mechanical prosthesis group（n=89）and bioprothesis group（n=39）according to the prosthesis used in the first procedure. Kaplan-Meier curve were estimated to evaluate the midlong term survival rate and events incidence related to prosthesis（including thrombosis, embolism and bleeding related to prosthesis and the prosthesis deterioration）. Multivariate binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate the independent risk factor for early and late death. Results There were 19 early deaths( 14.84%). With the followup of 4.93±2.92 years, there were 11 late deaths(10.7%). According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, the 10year actuarial survival rate for the bioprothesis group and mechanical prosthesis group were 65.6%±17.4% and 68.7%±10.8% respectively(Log-rank test,χ2=0.74，P=0.390). Freedom from prosthesis-related embolism at 5 years for the bioprothesis group and mechanical prosthesis group were 92.3%±7.4% and 87.1%±4.6% respectively(Log-rank test, χ2=0.962，P=0.327). Freedom from anticoagulationrelated bleeding at 10 years for the bioprothesis group and mechanical prosthesis group were 100% and 79.7%±9.7% respectively(Log-rank test, χ2=1.483，P= 0.223). There were 9 TVR reoperation, freedom from reoperation at 7 years for the bioprothesis group was 71.1%±18.0%, and freedom from reoperation at 10 years for the mechanical prosthesis group was 78.8%±10.2% (Log-rank test, χ2=2.76，P=0.096). Binary logistic regression revealed that the redo procedure and ascites were independent risk factors for early death, whereas ascites, heart function of New York Heart Association class Ⅲ/Ⅳ and multi valve replacement were independent risk factors for late death.Conclusion To lower the operative mortality and late mortality and morbidity, TVR should be adopted prior to the deterioration of right heart function, and bioprothesis valve has similar early and middlelong term clinical effect with mechanical valve in tricuspid position.
This article reports a case of a 70-year-old female patient who developed bioprosthetic mitral valve deterioration 4 months after her initial valve replacement surgery, manifesting as severe regurgitation and New York Heart Association Class Ⅲ. Due to the high risk of a redo open-heart surgery, she underwent a transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve procedure. Intraoperatively, a J-Valve prosthesis was successfully implanted under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Immediate transesophageal echocardiography confirmed an optimal valve position, complete resolution of regurgitation, and no significant paravalvular leak or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. She was extubated 16 hours post-procedure with significant improvement in cardiac function. Follow-up echocardiography showed normal prosthetic valve function.
ObjectiveTo explore the short-term follow-up clinical effect of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation treatment for mitral bioprosthesis deterioration.MethodsThe single center data of elderly patients with mitral valve bioprosthetic dysfunction who received transapical J-Valve intervention between January 2019 and May 2020 were reviewed and summarized. After the informed consent was signed, single lumen endotracheal intubation was performed under general anesthesia in hybrid operating room. The left intercostal small incision was used to explore the apical area. Fluoroscopy and three-dimensional esophageal ultrasound were used to guide the puncture needle. Then the guide wire entered the left atrium through the mitral valve biological valve. The catheter was exchanged, and the rigid support wire was exchanged. The reverse loaded J-Valve system was guided and implanted into the biological mitral valve with beating heart. The appropriate implantation depth was adjusted, and stent valve was released under rapid pacing. Post balloon dilation of the valve was performed if necessary.ResultsFrom January 2019 to May 2020, transcatheter J-Valve implantation was completed in 20 patients with mitral valve dysfunction and high-risk evaluation of routine thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (the Society of Thoracic Surgeon score above 6). In terms of the type of the the mitral bioprosthesis, there were 6 cases of Hancock valves, 7 cases of Perimount valves, 6 cases of Epic valves, and 1 case of Baxiter valve. In terms of the size of the the mitral bioprosthesis, there were 2 cases of size 29 valves, 11 cases of size 27 valves, and 7 cases of size 25 valves. One valve fell into the left ventricle at early stage. One patient had mild valve displacement during operation, and a second valve was implanted at the same time. The success rate of valve-in-valve implantation was 95%. The length of stay in intensive care unit was less than 6 h in 5 cases, 6-24 h in 13 cases, 24-48 h in 1 case, and more than 48 h in 1 case. No patient’s postoperative mitral regurgitation was moderate or above. The mean mitral valve pressure gradient was (5.2±2.3) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa). Patients recovered well after the valve-in-valve implantation treatment, with no death within postoperative one month. One patient died of infection and multiple organ failure during follow-up after one month. Other patients recovered smoothly without serious complications.ConclusionsThe clinical effect of J-Valve intervention in the treatment of mitral valve bioprosthetic dysfunction through apical approach is good. The implantation can be completed under beating heart, avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and routine thoracotomy cardiac arrest, which is worthy of further observation and follow-up.
Objective To summarize the early results and clinical experience of using the J-Valve for transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated bioprosthesis at different anatomic positions. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the short-term outcomes of 39 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation using the J-Valve System in the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital from April 2020 to August 2021 due to bioprosthetic degeneration at different anatomic positions. Among them, 35 patients underwent transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) implantation, 1 transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (TAViV) implantation, 1 transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TTViV) implantation, 1 TMViV implantation with simultaneous TAViV implantation, and another one TMViV implantation with simultaneous transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and perivalvular leakage (PVL) closure. Results Among the 35 patients who underwent isolated TMViV implantation, 17 were male and 18 were female with a mean age of 72.6±10.8 years. Mean duration between two operations was 10.5±2.7 years. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons and EuroSCORE Ⅱ scores were 12.95%±9.61% and 13.91%±8.94%, respectively. The device success rate was 97.1% and no death occured during the operation. One patient was transferred to thoracotomy due to device displacement, 1 was re-opened for uncontrolled bleeding, and 1 presented left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. One patient underwent craniotomy due to intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days after surgery, and no other complications occurred including death, stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation, cardiac tamponade, or re-hospitalization. The mean follow-up time was 6.0±4.4 months, the mean mitral valve gradient was significantly improved (10.4±2.0 mm Hg vs. 5.5±1.2 mm Hg, P<0.05), and the New York Heart Association class≤Ⅱ in all the patients at the last follow-up. Among the other 4 patients who did not undergo isolated TMViV implantation, the transapical TAViV implantation and the trans-right atrium TTViV implantation were successful without intra- or post-operative complications. The patient who underwent TMViV and TAViV implantation simultaneously via transapical approach died of severe pulmonary hemorrhage and multiple organ failure 16 days after surgery. The other patient who underwent transapical TMViV combined with TAVR and PVL closure died of septic shock 10 days after the surgery. Conclusion Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation using the J-Valve system is shown to be a safe and effective procedure to treat mitral, aortic and tricuspid bioprosthetic valve dysfunction in high-risk patients, providing a new alternative to surgical surgery for degenerated bioprosthesis at different anatomic positions. However, simultaneous different valves intervention should be very cautious.
ObjectiveTo analyze clinical experience and outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)for bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (MVR). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 32 patients who underwent VATS bioprosthetic MVR in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Guangdong General Hospital from March to December 2013. There were 14 males and 18 females with a mean age of 55.6±17.3 years (range, 19 to 80 years), mean body weight of 55.7±9.7 kg (range, 37 to 78 kg) and mean body surface area of 1.67±0.16 m2 (range, 1.30 to 1.95 m2). Five patients had atrial fibrillation. There were 20 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA)functional class Ⅱ, 11 patients in class Ⅲ, and 1 patient in class Ⅳ. There were 16 patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, 11 patients with degenerative mitral valve disease, 4 patients with infective endocarditis and 1 patient with associated congenital heart disease. ResultsVATS bioprosthetic MVR was successfully performed for all the patients, including 27 patients with Medtronic Hancock Ⅱ Bioprosthesis and 5 patients with Medtronic Mosaic Bioprosthesis. Concomitantly, tricuspid valvuloplasty was performed for 13 patients and atrial septal defect repair was performed for 1 patient. There was no in-hospital death, low cardiac output syndrome or left ventricular rupture. Postoperative echocardiography showed good bioprosthetic function in all the patients without paravalvular leakage. Postoperative cardiac function significantly improved compared with preoperative cardiac function. There were 9 patients in NYHA functional class Ⅰ, 17 patients in class Ⅱ, and 6 patients in class Ⅲ. Left atrial diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter examined postoperatively and 3 months after surgery were significantly smaller than preoperative values. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)examined postoperatively and 3 months after surgery was significantly lower than preoperative LVEF. ConclusionsVATS bioprosthetic MVR is a minimally invasive, safe and feasible procedure with a low postoperative morbidity. Incision size can be significantly reduced with a special type of bioprosthesis.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reason and prevention of late bioprosthetic heart valve thrombosis (LBVT). MethodsBioprosthetic heart valves were implanted in 580 patients between January 2001 and July 2013 in Changhai Hospital, and only found one case of LBVT (0.2%). Reoperation was performed for a 67-year-old male patient 3 years after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic valve stenosis. Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and reviewed the literature between January 1989 and December 2013 in Pubmed. ResultsNo risk factor for thrombosis was revealed in this patient. Pathology revealed valve thrombosis and collagen and elastic fibers fragmentation and disruption in valve leaflets. In literature review, 20 articles and 47 cases were brought in. The morbidity of LBVT was 0.2%-1.0%. At least 18 patients had high risk factors, and 15 of the 18 patients discontinued anticoagulation after 3 months. However, at least 10 patients had no high risk factors. Forty-four of the 47 patients received stented porcine valve replacement, only one patient received stented bovine pericardial valve replacement. ConclusionsLBVT is a rare but serious complication after bioprosthetic valve replacement, the causes of which include the feature of the patients and the bioprosthetic valves. Bovine pericardial valves could be superior to porcine valves in preventing LBVT. Postoperative long-time aspirin therapy is recommended for patients without high risk factors. Patients with any high risk factors should prolong anticoagulation.