【摘要】 目的 確定在不同濃度七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導無肌松氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）。 方法 2009年7月-2009年11月擇期手術患者60例，ASA I~II，年齡20~59歲，按照入室的順序隨機分為Ⅰ組（2%七氟醚組）和Ⅱ組（3%七氟醚組），預沖8%七氟醚誘導，眼瞼反射消失后，調節七氟醚呼氣末濃度分別維持在2%或3%，同時按照序貫法注入瑞芬太尼，瑞芬太尼注射90 s后氣管插管。記錄麻醉誘導前、患者意識消失時、插管前1 min、插管后1 min及插管后3 min心率、平均動脈壓的變化。 結果 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。 結論 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。【Abstract】 Objective To determine the half effective dose (ED50) of remifentanil dose for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular relaxant in adult when combined with different concentration of sevoflurane. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ adult aged 20 to 59 years old, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study between July 2009 to November 2009. All patients were ranged randomly into Group Ⅰ (2% sevoflurane) and Group Ⅱ (3% sevoflurane).Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygenat at 6 L/min.After the loss of eyelash reflex, remifentanil was injected over 30 s, end-tidal sevoflurane concentration 2% or 3% was maitained. The dose of remifentanil was determined by up-and-down method. In 90 s after the end of bolus administration of remifentanil, the trachea was intubated. Mean blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at anaesthetic induction, the loss of eyelash reflex, before, in 1 min and 3 min after intubation. Results ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation during 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant were 0.585 μg/kg and 0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg, and 0.492 μg/kg and 0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg, respectively. Conclusion ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant are 0.585 μg/kg (0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg) and 0.492 μg/kg (0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg), respectively.
目的:探討甲狀腺手術中氟比洛芬酯對丙泊酚—瑞芬太尼麻醉效果的影響。方法:將210例擇期丙泊酚—瑞芬太尼麻醉下行甲狀腺手術患者隨機分為對照組和氟比洛芬酯組,每組105例。于切皮前30 min,對照組靜脈注入等量生理鹽水10mL,氟比洛芬酯組經靜脈注入氟比洛芬酯注射液100 mg。分別記錄患者麻醉前10 min (T0)、切皮時(T1)、切皮后10 min (T2)、切除腺體時 (T3)以及拔管時 (T4) 的血流動力學 (SBP、DBP、HR) 的變化以及術后口述描述評分(VRS)。結果:與對照組比較, 氟比洛芬酯組T14時SP、DP均降低,兩組差別有統計學意義(Plt;005)。氟比洛芬酯組離開手術室時無痛率明顯高于對照組,兩組差別有統計學意義(Plt;005)。結論:氟比洛芬酯對丙泊酚—瑞芬太尼麻醉下行甲狀腺手術患者血流動力學影響小,且減輕術后疼痛,術后恢復更為舒適。
目的:比較七氟醚吸入麻醉和丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼靜脈麻醉用于小兒手術的臨床效果。方法:100例1～8歲的患兒隨機分為丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼組(A組)與七氟醚吸入組(B組）。麻醉誘導后,A組持續輸注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼維持麻醉,B組吸入七氟醚維持麻醉。術中根據生命體征調整丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的輸注速度及七氟醚的吸入濃度,記錄術中循環變化、術后麻醉恢復情況。結果:與B組相比,A組術中MAP下降明顯(Plt;005)。結論:與A組相比,B組術中生命體征控制平穩;術后清醒迅速、完全、平穩,拔管時間無明顯差異。
目的:比較瑞芬太尼聯合異丙酚或依托咪酯全麻在腹腔鏡婦科手術中的臨床效果。方法:擇期腹腔鏡婦科手術80例,隨機分成瑞芬太尼異丙酚組(RP組)和瑞芬太尼依托咪酯組(RE組),各40例。兩組全麻誘導用藥相同,維持麻醉RP組采用瑞芬太尼聯合異丙酚、RE組采用瑞芬太尼聯合依托咪酯。記錄基礎值、誘導后、插管后1 min、3 min、氣腹時、氣腹后10、20、30、40 min的動脈收縮壓(SBP)、舒張壓(DBP)、心率(HR);記錄停藥至自主呼吸恢復、睜眼、拔除氣管導管、恢復定向能力的時間;記錄清醒即刻及清醒后1、2、4、8、12、16、20、24 h患者疼痛程度,采用VAS評分;記錄24 h內不良反應發生情況。 結果: 兩組SBP、DBP均在誘導后明顯低于基礎值(Plt;001), 插管后恢復,氣腹開始后趨于平穩;兩組HR均在誘導后減慢(Plt;001),插管后及氣腹開始時恢復。RP組自主呼吸恢復、呼之能睜眼、拔除氣管導管及恢復定向能力的時間均明顯短于RE組(Plt;001)。麻醉清醒即刻、清醒后1、2、4、8 h VAS評分RE組明顯低于RP組(Plt;005),12、16、20、24 h VAS評分兩組比較無顯著性差異(Pgt;005)。術后發生惡心嘔吐患者數RP組明顯減少(Plt;005)。 結論:全麻行腹腔鏡婦科手術時,瑞芬太尼聯合異丙酚或依托咪酯都能緩解氣腹及手術引起的血流動力學變化,瑞芬太尼聯合異丙酚術后蘇醒快且能明顯降低術后惡心嘔吐的發生率,但術后疼痛較為嚴重。
目的 系統評價瑞芬太尼用于全身麻醉下剖宮產時對新生兒的影響。 方法 檢索Cochrane Library、PubMed、OVID、EMbase、CNKI、萬方等中外數據庫，收集1990年－2012年關于瑞芬太尼用于全身麻醉下剖宮產的臨床隨機對照研究。按Cochrane系統評價方法評估文獻質量，用Revman 5.1軟件對提取的數據進行Meta分析。 結果 共納入10項研究，包括342例產婦。與空白對照組相比，瑞芬太尼降低新生兒1 min Apgar評分[WMD=?0.46，95%CI（?0.65，?0.27），P＜0.000 01]，提高出生時臍動脈pH值[WMD=0.01，95%CI（0.00，0.02），P=0.004]，增加出生時窒息發生率[RR=1.76，95%CI（1.06，2.95），P=0.03]；當誘導劑量為1.0～1.5 μg/kg時，對5 min Apgar評分無影響[WMD=?0.14，95%CI（?0.32，0.04），P=0.13]。 結論 瑞芬太尼用于全身麻醉剖宮產可減輕新生兒酸中毒，但是會對新生兒產生一過性的呼吸抑制。
目的 探討丙泊酚復合瑞芬太尼在患者清醒狀態下實施無痛腸鏡法的可行性。 方法 2011年7月－2012年7月，將160例行無痛腸鏡檢查的患者隨機分為兩組: A組用芬太尼復合丙泊酚麻醉,其中男38例，女42例，平均年齡（48 ± 16）歲，平均體重（53.37 ± 9.5）kg；B組以阿托品0.25～0.5 mg緩慢靜脈注射，繼而以瑞芬太尼+丙泊酚復合液緩慢靜脈滴注，使患者保持清醒狀態，其中男43例，女37例，平均年齡（49 ± 15）歲，平均體重（54.26 ± 8.3）kg。觀察兩組患者檢查中血壓、心率、呼吸、血氧飽和度變化，檢查中體動反應，檢查后蘇醒時間、定向力恢復、行走時間、離室時間，以及對檢查過程的記憶情況。 結果 兩組患者均能順利完成檢查，術中記憶率均低，差異無統計學意義（P＞0.05）。A組患者循環改變、心動過緩、低氧血癥、以及體動反應明顯高于B組（P＜0.05），B組患者蘇醒時間、定向力恢復、行走時間、離室時間，明顯短于A組（P＜0.05）。 結論 瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚復合液伍用阿托品能夠安全應用于患者清醒狀態下實施的無痛腸鏡檢查，具有良好的臨床推廣價值。
Objective To systematically review the clinical effectiveness and safety of sufentanil-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery. Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013), the database of the Cochrane Anesthesia Group, MEDLINE, EMbase, PubMed, Ovid, Springer, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched from inception to May 2013 for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sufentanil-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Thirteen trials involving 647 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) for hemodynamic changes, MAP decreased in the remifentanil-propofol group after induction and decreased 5 minutes after intubation, but no significant difference was found between the two groups; the two groups were alike in MAP changes during craniotomy and extubation, and in HR changes after induction, 5 minutes after intubation, during craniotomy and extubation, with no significant difference. b) The result of intra-operative wake-up test showed that, there was no significant difference in the sedative effect and the time of awaking between the two groups. c) For emergence time and extubation time, compared with the sufentanil-propofol group, emergence time and extubation time were significantly shorter than those in the remifentanil-propofol group. d) For side effects, there was no significant difference in side effects (such as post-operative nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, restlessness, chills and hypotension) between the two groups. And e) for post-operative pain, compared with the remifentanil-propofol group, post-operative 1-h and 2-h VAS were lower and the number of who need additional analgesic drugs within 24 h after operation was less in the sufentanil-propofol group, with significant differences. Both groups used the similar dosage of propofol with no significant difference. Conclusion Compared with the remifentanil-propofol group, hemodynamics changes in the sufentanil-propofol group is steadier after induction and during intubation. Patients in the sufentanil-propofol group are better in postoperative awakening quality. But they are alike in the incidence of side effects and propofol dosage.
目的 探討丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼對肝臟缺血再灌注損傷的保護作用以及作用機制。 方法 2009年6月－2011年12月選擇擇期需阻斷肝門的肝臟手術患者40例，隨機分為丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼組（P組）和異氟醚組（I組），每組20例。在術前（T0）和肝門阻斷開放后30 min（T1）、60 min（T2）、6 h（T3）、24 h（T4）、72 h（T5）分別抽取動脈血，測定天冬氨酸氨基轉移酶（AST）、丙氨酸氨基轉移酶（ALT）和腫瘤壞死因子α（TNF-α）的含量。 結果 兩組AST、ALT、TNF-α較術前均有增高，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；P組增高幅度明顯低于I組，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼對肝臟缺血再灌注損傷具有保護作用，抑制TNF-α的產生可能為其作用機制之一。
ObjectiveTo study the feasibility of using propofol and remifentanil for reduction of shoulder joint dislocation in the conscious elderly patients, and compare its efficacy with brachial plexus block anesthesia. MethodsSeventy elderly patients (American Sociaty of Anesthesiologist physical statusⅠ-Ⅱ) who underwent shoulder dislocation reduction in our hospital between August 2011 and December 2013 were randomly divided into two groups, each group having 35 cases. Patients in group A received brachial plexus nerve block anesthesia downlink gimmick reset, while patients in group B received the use of remifentanil-propofol and lidocaine compound liquid intravenous drop infusion for anesthesia downlink manipulative reduction. After successful anesthesia, two groups of patients were treated with traction and foot pedal method (Hippocrates) to reset. We observed the two groups of patients in the process of reduction, and recorded their hemodynamic changes, reset time, discharge time, postoperative satisfaction, intra-operative memory, breathing forgotten (breathing interval was longer than 15 seconds) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and then comparison was made between the two groups. ResultsPatients in both the two groups successfully completed manipulative reduction. Compared with group A, patients in group B had more stable hemodynamic indexes during the process of reduction, shorter reduction time, better anesthesia effect and higher postoperative satisfaction degree, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of time of leaving the operation room between the two groups (P>0.05). VAS score was higher in group A than that in group B (P<0.05). The occurrence of intra-operative memory amnesia and breathing forgotten phenomenon existed in part of the patients after operation in group B, but they did not occur in patients in group A. ConclusionRemifentanyl propofol-lidocaine compound fluid can be safely used in conscious elderly patients for shoulder joint dislocation reconstructive surgery, and it functions quickly with complete analgesia and stable hemodynamic indexes.
目的:觀察等效劑量瑞芬太尼和芬太尼誘導氣管插管對小兒血流動力學的影響。方法:40例擇期行全麻患兒隨機分為瑞芬太尼組和芬太尼組,麻醉誘導使用咪唑安定0.15mg/kg、丙泊酚2.5mg/kg、芬太尼2.5μg/kg或瑞芬太尼2μg/kg和維庫溴銨0.1mg/kg。分別于麻醉誘導前(T0)、誘導后2min(T1)、插管后1、2min(T2、T3)記錄心率、收縮壓和舒張壓。結果:兩組誘導前血流動力學指標相似。與T0時比較,兩組患兒T1時收縮壓、舒張壓均降低(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01),心率均減慢(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01);瑞芬太尼組T2.T3時收縮壓、舒張壓降低(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01),心率減慢(Plt;0.05);芬太尼組T2、T3時收縮壓、舒張壓升高(Plt;0.05),心率增快(Plt;0.05)。與芬太尼組比較,瑞芬太尼組T1、T2和T3時收縮壓、舒張壓均降低(Plt;0.05),心率減慢(Plt;0.05)。結論:瑞芬太尼比等效劑量芬太尼能更好地抑制小兒全麻誘導氣管插管時的心血管反應。