Objective To review the complex situation，surgical experience，and surgical technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC）．Methods The clinical data of 86 patients who underwent LC in our hospital and the consulting hospitals from February 2005 to April 2011 were retrospectively analyzed．According to the complicated conditions，the different surgical techniques were applied during LC such as lamellar dissection，aspirater stripping method，laparoscopic suture，and intraoperative cholangiography．Results The operation time was （68±23）min （25－210 min），blood loss was （55±13）ml （15－200 ml）．LC was successfully performed in 84 of 86 cases．Only two patients received transferring laparotomy because of scar tissue in Calot triangle that was hard to dissect．No severe complications occurred，such as biliary leakage，bleeding after operation，stricture of bile duct，retained calculus，and so on．All the patients were cured before discharge．Conclusion Lamellar dissection，aspirater stripping method，and laparoscopic suture combined with the view of laparotomy can be used to deal with complicated LC successfully．
1.36 吻合口吻合口相關并發癥包括吻合口慢性滲血或活躍性出血、吻合口滲漏、吻合口及吻合口周圍感染、吻合口崩裂退縮、吻合口糜爛潰瘍、吻合口異物殘留、吻合口息肉樣或肉牙腫樣增生、吻合口炎性或疤痕性狹窄等,均是前切除吻合技術本身無法回避的難題,無論醫師怎樣努力,某些患者某些時段總是時有發生,且常常出乎意料。........
ObjectiveTo evaluate the application of modified perineal stapled prolapse resection in treatment of external rectal prolapse, and to assess the preliminary efficacy. MethodsClinical data of 11 patients with external rectal prolapse underwent modified perineal stapled prolapse resection in The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine between December 2013 and August 2015 were collected for retrospectively analysis. ResultsAll patients with external rectal prolapse were performed modified perineal stapled prolapse resection with general anesthesia and (or) epidural anesthesia. The average operation time was (53.6±6.1) min (40-85 min) and the average blood loss was (35.3±10.1) mL (20-60 mL). The time of the first flatus was less than 24 h after operation, the time of the first defecation was (44.6±3.3) h (40-52 h) after operation. The average hospital stay was (9.7±1.8) d (7-12 d) and average cost was (34 635.8±1 268.8) RMB (31 796-36 212 RMB). None of them occurred serious complications such as uncontrollable anastomotic stoma bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, bowel obstruction, and anastomotic straitness. All of the 11 patients were followed up for (4.7±0.8) months (3-7 months), and all patients did not suffered from recurrence and fecal incontinence during follow-up period. ConclusionsThe essential procedure for modified perineal stapled prolapse resection is cutting the prolapse open at 3 and 9 clock directly at the same time by linear staplers, and dissecting mesorectum before using the contour satpler. Modified perineal stapled prolapse resection is a safe and effective operation technique for the external rectal prolapse.
Objective To investigate the surgical technique of establ ishing a rel iable rat model of orthotopic l ivertransplantation. Methods A total of 200 adult male SD rats weighing 200-250 g and 60 adult male Wistar rats weighing230-280 g were adopted. The weight of donor was 30 g less than that of receptor. Syngeneic group of SD-SD rats (SD-SD group, n=70) and allogeneic group of SD-Wistar rats (SD-Wistar group, n=60) l iver transplantation were performed, respectively. Orthotopic l iver transplantations in rats were performed using modified Kamada’s two-cuff technique. Under the sufficient exposure of the porta hepatis, the l iver was perfused through the cold of perfusion of portal vein without touching the l iver. The anastomosis of the suprahepatic vena cave was sutured end- to-end with 8-0 prolene l ine. Guided by double l ine, the continuity of portal vein was establ ished by cuff method easily. The fluid was supplemented sufficiently after operation to maintain the stabil ization of hemodynamics. Results The time for donor operation and receptor operation was (38.2 ± 2.5) minutes and (45.6 ± 3.5) minutes, and anhepatic time was (15.1 ± 2.2) minutes.The successful rate was 93%. The survival rate after 1 week was 92%. There was a significant difference when compared with traditional method (P lt; 0.05). There were 64 survivals in SDSD group and 57 in SD-Wistar group after l iver transplantation, and the survival time was 2-9 months (mean 145 days) and 8-20 days (mean 10.5 days) respectively. The l iver function recovered well in SD-SD group, while in SD-Wistar group the l iver functional failure and acute rejection occurred in pathology 3-5 days after l iver transplantation, all of which ended with death without any therapy. Conclusion The modified method is proved to be ideal for its advantages of simple operation, short anhepatic phase and high operative successful rate.
(承2007年第6期) 6.2 盆腹膜重建的種類和方法 6.2.1 盆底隔離法如前所述,因超低位直腸/肛管癌浸潤會陰直腸隔、盆側壁及肛周擴約肌群而實施了新腹會陰局部擴大切除術,因T4期直腸癌浸潤子宮陰道或膀胱前列腺部分組織而實施了盆腔臟器局部擴大切除術,因局部復發性直腸癌而實施了腹會陰聯合再切除術,因各種原因對中晚期直腸癌實施了Hartmann手術,以及因技術不確定性而實施了傳統腹會陰聯合切除術,無論手術切除范圍或術者的操作技巧如何,由于病變性質決定了這類手術只能定位于根治性(R0)與姑息性(R2)之間的程度.因此,初次切除只是獲得治愈或延長生存期的第一步,接下來是盆腔放療或局部內放射治療,最后,尚存在局部復發的高風險,若發生,可經會陰骶尾部再次甚至多次對復發癌行局部姑息性切除.因而預先有效的盆底隔離就可避免再手術時的小腸損傷,這就是盆底重建術的主要功能和適應證之一.……