ObjectiveThis study aims to compare different references for the fetal risk of drugs used in pregnancy to provide evidence for the safety of drug use in pregnancy.MethodsFour drug databases, including Lexicomp, Micromedex, TERIS, and Reprotox, as well as two books of drugs in pregnancy edited by Briggs and Schaefer, were searched. Descriptive analysis was performed regarding the definition of pregnancy recommendations and the specific content of medication.ResultsThe six references employed slightly different approaches to drugs in pregnancy, however, all of them included summaries of the risk in pregnancy, data of crossing the placenta, and human and animal data. The databases of Micromedex, TERIS, and a book edited by Briggs had their risk classification systems for drug use during pregnancy. For specific drugs, the summary of different information in pregnancy was different, the amount and content of listed evidence varied, and there was no evaluation of the quality and relevance of evidence among the references.ConclusionsThere is no consensus on the risk assessment of drugs in pregnancy. Risk classification systems for drugs in pregnancy are still an important method for determining the fetal risk of drugs. The existing references merely list studies of drugs in pregnancy, without comprehensive quality assessment. A methodological study of assessment of the risk of drugs in pregnancy is required.
Objective To summarize the recent studies on diagnosis and treatment for pregnancy-associated breast cancer （PABC） to provide evidence for diagnosis and treatment for PABC. Methods By PubMed， Medline， and CNKI retrieval system， with “pregnancy-associated breast cancer or PABC， diagnosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer or PABC， treatment of pregnancy-associated breast cancer or PABC” as key words to retrieval for the recent researches about PABC. All of the publications about studies on diagnosis and treatment for PABC were reviewed and summarized. Results Diagnosis of PABC included ultrasound， mammography， magnetic resonance imaging， needle biopsy， and so on， and the treatment contained surgery， chemotherapy， endocrine therapy， radiation therapy， and targeted therapy. However， when diagnosis and treatment for PABC involved， the impact to patients with pregnancy and fetus must be considered in priority. Conclusions By reviewing the studies of relevant papers about diagnosis and treatment for PABC which can provide a clinical guidance for clinicians. Usage of bevacizumab and lapatinib still needs to further be studied.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the relationship between maternal alcoholic consumption during pregnancy and the occurrence of childhood cancer in offspring. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were electronically searched to obtain related case-control and cohort studies from inception to December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included articles. Meta-analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 18 articles involving 9 childhood tumors' outcome were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with women who never drink alcohol during pregnancy, alcoholic consumption during pregnancy increased the incidence risk of childhood cancer (OR=1.13, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.26, P=0.04). Subgroup analysis showed that alcoholic consumption during pregnancy significantly increased the incidence risk of acute leukemia (OR=1.17, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.30, P=0.002) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (OR=1.23, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.48, P=0.03). ConclusionThe current evidence suggests that alcoholic consumption during pregnancy significantly increases the incidence risk of childhood cancer in offspring, particularly acute leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included articles, more high-quality birth cohort studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods Based on the clinical questions raised from a real-life patient of gestational diabetes mellitus, we searched ACP Journal Club (1991 to Dec. 2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to Dec. 2006) and Chinese Biological Medical Database (1980 to Dec. 2006) for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies. We used the following keywords: gestational diabetes, metformin, and pregnancy complication. The quality of the included studies was assessed.Results One meta-analysis (from MEDLINE) and two randomized controlled trials (from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were included. These studies concluded that there was no clear evidence on the benefits of metformin for gestational diabetes. Based on the current evidence, integrated with clinical expertise and the patient’s values, metformin was not used for this patient. Instead, intensive dietary control, blood glucose control, and appropriate exercise were administered. After this individual treatment, the patient gave birth to a healthy baby in 39+4 Weeks. Conclusion The appropriate management for gestational diabetes mellitus has been formulated with the approach of evidence-based medicine. Large-scale, methodologically-sound trials are required.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the correlation between maternal serum selenium levels during pregnancy and premature birth.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect studies on correlation between maternal serum selenium levels during pregnancy with preterm birth in the offspring from inception to January, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias of the included literature. Then, meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 studies involving 2 484 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with control group, the preterm group had lower serum selenium levels in pregnant females (SMD=?0.89, 95%CI ?1.56 to ?0.22, P=0.01). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that heterogeneity among subjects was still large when grouped accorcding to the continent to which a country belongs, the time of blood sample collection and test method in pregnant females.ConclusionsLow maternal serum selenium levels during pregnancy may increase the risk of preterm birth. Due to the limitation of the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To study the advances in research of breast cancer during pregnancy. Methods The literatures in recent years were reviewed. Results A lot of evidences suggested that the diagnosis may be delayed easily. The diagnosis was primarily made by needle aspiration cytology and biopsy. The treatment of pregnant breast cancer was not different from ordinary breast cancer, however the factor of foetus should be taken into account. Termination of pregnancy did not improve survival. Conclusion Pregnant breast cancer is mostly at later stage at the time of diagnosis and has poorer prognosis than ordinary breast cancer. The patients with breast cancer during pregnancy usually have an equivalent survival rate when compared with age and stagematched ordinary group. Future pregnancy may be allowed after two years of treatment in patients with early breast cancer.
Objective Based on the methodology of evidence-based medicine, we explored the prognosis of a patient with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods We searched ACP Journal Club (1991 to October 2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1990 to October 2006) and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM). Cohort studies, case-control studies and case series studies involving the prognosis of patients with GDM were collected. The available evidence was critically appraised. Results During the period from 6 weeks to 28 years after delivery, the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus appeared to vary from 2.6% to 70%. Patients with GDM suffered from an increased incidence of spontaneous premature delivery, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and vaginal infection. Conclusion Patients with GDM appears to be more liable to overt diabetes mellitus, and to suffer fromspontaneous premature delivery, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and vaginal infection than women with normal glucose tolerance during pregnancy. Further studies of the long-term follow-up data from GDM trials are needed.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnosis value of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).MethodsThe diagnostic studies concerning glycosylated hemoglobin in gestational diabetes were electronically searched in EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to October, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by QUADAS-2 standard. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software.ResultsA total of 33 studies involving 16 622 persons were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, the pooled DOR of HbA1c were 0.75 (95%CI 0.74 to 0.77), 0.91 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.91), 8.21 (95%CI 5.41 to 12.46), 0.18 (95%CI 0.11 to 0.28), 45.10 (95%CI 29.70 to 68.48), respectively. The AUC of SROC was 0.933 5. Subgroup analysis by different HbA1c measurements indicated that little variations between different measurements in sensitivity and specificity.ConclusionHbA1c in GDM diagnosis has high sensitivity and specificity. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above results should be validated by more studies.
目的 了解國內妊娠期抗菌藥物的應用現狀。 方法 通過檢索1994年－2012年國內醫學文獻，篩選出妊娠期間使用抗菌藥物的原始病例報道，對收集的病例按照用藥原因、抗菌藥物品種、妊娠安全性分級進行統計分析。其中妊娠安全性分級是根據美國藥物和食品管理局（FDA）頒布的藥物危害等級標準，分為A、B、C、D、X級。 結果 妊娠期使用抗菌藥物的常見原因為泌尿系統感染，選用的抗菌藥物以頭孢菌素和青霉素類為主（B類），但仍有部分病例選用C類、D類藥物及超說明書用藥。 結論 存在妊娠期抗菌藥物不合理應用現象，妊娠合并感染性疾病需用抗菌藥物時，醫生應權衡抗菌藥物對胎兒的可能危害及對母體的治療作用，最大限度地避免用藥對胎兒造成不良影響。