Objective To investigate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. MethodsBetween February 2017 and January 2020, 11 patients with aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis were revised using 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses. There were 7 males and 4 females with an average age of 44 years (range, 25-60 years). In the first operation, all patients underwent total tumor resection, modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis reconstruction, and autologous femoral head transplantation. According to the Enneking pelvic partition system, 8 cases were resected in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ and 3 cases in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ. The interval from the initial operation to this revision ranged from 14.3-66.2 months, with an average of 35.8 months. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. At 6 months after the first operation, before revision, and at last follow-up, the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the recovery of lower limb function. The pain-free walking distance of patients without brace assistance was recorded at last follow-up. X-ray films were taken at 1 month after the first operation, before revision, and at 1 month after revision, the acetabulum position was assessed by the differences in weight arm and cup height between bilateral hip joints. At last follow-up, the digital X-ray tomography was taken to evaluate the prosthesis-bone integration and the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Results The operation time was 182.6-238.0 minutes (mean, 197.4 minutes). The amount of intraoperative bleeding was 400-860 mL (mean, 550.0 mL). All incisions healed by first intention with no infection, hip dislocation, nerve damage, or vascular-related adverse events. The MSTS score and Harris score at last follow-up were significantly higher than those at 6 months after the first operation and before revision (P<0.05), while the score before revision was significantly lower than that at 6 months after the first operation (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the patients were able to walk more than 1 000 meters painlessly without brace assistance. Imaging review showed that the difference of cup height at 1 month after revision was significantly lower than that at 1 month after the first operation and before revision, and at 1 month after the first operation than before revision operation, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the difference of weight arm among three time points (P>0.05). All prostheses were well integrated, and no aseptic loosening of the prosthesis or screw fracture occurred. Conclusion Revision with 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses benefited in reconstructing stable pelvic ring and natural bodyweight transmission for patients encountering the aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. Early postoperative rehabilitation training can maximize the recovery of patient limb function, reduce pain during walking, and reduce the incidence of complications.
Objective To study the effect of vancomycin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (VCMPMMA) in the treatment of an experimental hemiprosthetic hip infectionof rabbits. Methods The infected hemiprosthetic hip joints of the rabbits underwent debridement and one-stage revision arthroplasty. Requested by the “fixed” method, 24 rabbits were equally divided into 2 groups: the control group and theexperimental group. The prostheses were fixed with PMMA in the control group, but with VCM-PMMA in the experimental group. X-ray films were taken immediately after operation, and then 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation. The C reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured before operation, then measured 1, 3, and 7 days after operation, and then 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, i.e., they were measured at the above 8 time points. All the rabbits were sacrificed 12 weeks later. The cure rate of the infection was determined by the blood culture for the corresponding bacteria and the Rhodamine-labeled anti-Staphylococcus epidermidisimmune serum staining. Results The X-ray films revealed that6 hemiprosthetic hip joints were dislocated in the control group, but 3 in the experimental group; 58.3% and 16.7% of the hemiprosthetic hip joints were reinfected in the control group and the experimental group, respectively. At 8 weeks in the control group, the serum CRP level decreased to a greater extent than that measured at the time of debridement, but in the experimental group just at 2 weeks （Plt;0.01）. ESR remained elevated in the control group, but at 4 weeks ESR were significantly lowered compared with that measured at the time of debridement（Plt;0.01）. The test results for the pathogenic organisms revealed that the re-infection incidences were respectively 58.3% (7/12) and 16.7% (2/12) in the control group and the experimental group, with the successful revision rates of 41.7% and 83.3% respectively in the above 2 groups. The light microscopy revealed that therewas a heavy infiltration by the inflammatory cells in the reinfected tissues, but there was a proliferation of the fibrocytes in the tissues of the cured patients. Conclusion Onestage revision arthroplasty can significantly promote the control of the hemiprosthetic hip joint infection in rabbits by the use of VCM-PMMA.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cemented polyethylene liner technique in hip revision.MethodsBased on inclusion criteria, the clinical data of 26 patients who were undergone hip revision between January 2011 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 14 cases were treated with isolated liner exchange (group A) and 12 cases were treated with cemented polyethylene liner technique (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, the time from primary total hip arthroplasty to revision, and the preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The post-operative Harris score and complications were compared between 2 groups, and X-ray findings of the hip joint were recorded to review the position of hip components.ResultsAll patients were followed up 4.4-6.4 years (mean, 5.4 years). Except for two femoral fractures during the revision (1 in each group), there was no other complication in 2 groups. The hip pain relieved and the lame gait corrected in 2 groups. The hip’s function of 2 groups improved gradually after operation, with a better Harris score at 3 months and the best at last follow-up, compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score at difference time points after operation between 2 group (P>0.05). X-ray films showed no dislocation, aseptic loosening, and other interface related complication.ConclusionFor the cases without the chance to do change liner, cemented polyethylene liner technique has a good effectiveness. But restrict patient selection should be considered before hip revision.
ObjectiveTo investigate revision reasons and prosthesis selection of Crowe Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsA clinical data of 14 patients (15 hips) with Crowe Ⅳ DDH, who underwent a revision hip arthroplasty between January 2008 and May 2018, was retrospectively reviewed. There were 1 male (1 hip) and 13 females (14 hips). The age ranged from 27 to 63 years (mean, 45.0 years). There were 7 cases of left hip, 6 cases of right hip, and 1 case of bilateral hips. The prosthetic interfaces of primary THA were metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) in 9 hips, ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) in 4 hips, ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) in 1 hip, and ceramic-on-metal in 1 hip. The time from primary THA to revision was 3-204 months (mean, 65.0 months). The causes of revision included aseptic loosening in 7 hips, dislocation in 3 hips, periprosthetic joint infection in 2 hips, osteolysis in 1 hip, nonunion of osteotomy in 1 hip, and a small-angle of femoral anteversion in 1 hip. Preoperative Harris score was 54.1±17.8 and the range of motion (ROM) of flexion was (92.7±20.2)°. Preoperative X-ray films showed the acetabular bone defect in 11 hips and osteolysis of femoral side in 4 hips. During the revision, the prostheses with COP and COC interfaces were used in 5 hips and 10 hips, respectively. Both acetabular and femoral revisions were performed in 11 hips and only femoral revision was performed in 4 hips.ResultsThe mean operation time was 3.7 hours (range, 1.5-6.0 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 940.0 mL (range, 200-2 000 mL). All patients were followed up 16-142 months (mean, 73.9 months). Postoperative X-ray films showed no difference in inclination and anteversion between primary THA and revision (P>0.05). The height of rotation center and offset after revision were higher than those after primary THA, and the difference in offset was significant (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the Harris score and ROM of flexion were 85.0±7.3 and (115.0±17.0)°, respectively, which were significantly higher when compared with those before revision (t=8.909, P=0.000; t=4.911, P=0.000). Three hips underwent a re-revision operation. All protheses were fixed well and no radiolucent line, loosening, or subsidence was observed at last follow-up.ConclusionThe most common reason for revision in patients with Crowe Ⅳ DDH after THA was aseptic loosening. Due to high activity demand of this population, the prosthesis with MOP interface should be prevented and the prosthesis with COC interface could be alternative. Metal block, cup-cage, and reinforcement ring were reasonable solutions for reconstruction of acetabulum with severe bone defects and have satisfactory effectiveness. S-ROM prosthesis should be the preferred stem for neither primary THA or revision.
Objective To investigate the medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky typeⅠ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect. MethodsBetween June 2012 and December 2018, 44 patients with Paprosky typeⅠ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect received hip revision using SL-PLUS MIA stem. There were 28 males and 16 females, with an average age of 57.7 years (range, 31-76 years). Indications for revision comprised aseptic loosening (27 cases) and periprosthetic joint infection (17 cases). The Harris hip scores were 54 (48, 60) and 43 (37, 52) in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. The preoperative femoral bone defects were identified as Paprosky type Ⅰ in 32 cases, type Ⅱ in 9 cases, type ⅢA in 2 cases, and type ⅢB in 1 case. Operation time and intraoperative blood transfusion volume were recorded. During follow-up after operation, the hip joint function were evaluated by Harris hip score and X-ray films, the femoral stem survival was analyzed, and the surgical related complications were recorded. Results The operation time of infected patients was 95-215 minutes, with an average of 125.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume was 400-1 800 mL, with an average of 790.0 mL. The operation time of patients with aseptic loosening was 70-200 minutes, with an average of 121.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume was 400-1 400 mL, with an average of 721.7 mL. All patients were followed up 5.3-10.0 years (mean, 7.4 years). At last follow-up, the Harris hip scores were 88 (85, 90) and 85 (80, 88) in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively, both of which were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). Radiological examination results showed that the distal end of the newly implanted femoral stem did not cross the distal end of the original prosthesis in 25 cases, and all femoral stems obtained bone fixation. Two cases experienced femoral stem subsidence and 1 case had a translucent line on the lateral side of the proximal femoral stem. When aseptic loosening was defined as the end event, the 10-year survival rate of the SL-PLUS MIA stem was 100%. When treatment failure due to any reason was defined as the end event, the survival time of the prosthesis was (111.70±3.66) months, and the 7-year survival rate was 95.5%. The 7-year survival rates were 94.1% and 96.3% in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 9.1% (4/44), among which the prosthesis related complications were 4.5% (2/44), 1 case of dislocation and 1 case of infection recurrence. ConclusionHip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem has the advantages of simple operation and few postoperative complications in the patients with Paprosky type Ⅰ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect, and the medium- and long-term effectiveness is reliable.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of acetabulum reinforcement ring (Cage) with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision. Methods Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (14 hips) with serious acetabular bone defects after total hip arthroplasty underwent acetabular reconstruction by using Cage with allograft bone. There were 6 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59.2 years (range, 45-76 years). The mean time between first replacement and revision was 7.2 years (range, 5-12 years). The revision causes included infection in 8 cases, osteolysis and aseptic loosening in 6 cases. The hip function Harris score was 37.7 ± 5.3. According to America Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) standard, the acetabular defect was classified as type III in 8 cases and as type IV in 6 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication occurred. The patients were followed up 14-62 months (mean, 44 months). The pain was relieved or disappeared. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.7 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 44.40, P=0.04). No loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis was found in 14 hips. No absorption or collapse of the allograft was observed in all patients. Conclusion Cage with allograft bone is a useful method of reconstructing acetabular bone defects in hip revision. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction in the treatment of revision patients with ACL graft failure.MethodsBetween January 2018 and June 2019, 15 patients underwent ACL revision with double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction. There were 12 males and 3 females with an average age of 30.1 years (range, 17-49 years). The technique of primary ACL reconstruction included single-bundle reconstruction in 13 cases and double-bundle reconstruction in 2 cases. These reconstructions applied autografts in 14 cases and allograft in 1 case. The causes of ACL reconstruction failure were identified as traumatic rupture in 9 cases and non-traumatic failure in 6 cases, including 2 cases of graft absorption and 3 cases of graft laxity. The average time from the primary ACL reconstruction to revision was 28.5 months (range, 8-60 months). The subjective and objective indicators of knee joint function were compared before operation and at last follow-up to evaluate the effectiveness. The subjective indicators included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score. The objective indicators included anterior tibial translation (dynamic and static) and side-to-side difference (SSD), pivot-shift test, Lachman test, the difference of single-legged hop test, and the loss ratio of extensor muscle strength on the affected side.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intetion, and no complications such as infection, venous thrombosis of lower extremity, or neurovascular injury occurred. All patients were followed up for an average of 19.1 months (range, 12-30 months). At last follow-up, all patients had returned to pre-injury sports level. The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were significantly improved (P<0.05); anterior tibial translations (dynamic and static) significantly decreased when compared with preoperative one (P<0.05) and returned to the physiological range. The SSD, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, the difference of single-legged hop test, and the loss ratio of extensor muscle strength on the affected side were significantly better than those before operation (P<0.05).During the follow-up, there was no re-rupture of the graft, no stiffness of the knee joint and limitation of mobility; 1 case had a protruding femoral end compression screw, which was removed through the original incision under local anesthesia. ConclusionDouble-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction can significantly improve the knee function in revision patients with ACL graft failure. It can reduce the anterior translation of tibia, and effectively prevent postoperative rotational instability of the knee.
ObjectiveTo assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision and to analyze the relevant factors that may affect the surgical outcomes.MethodsThe clinical data of 24 patients who underwent ACL revision surgery between April 2009 and July 2018 and were followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 4 females with a median age of 30 years [interquartile distance (IQR) was (25, 36) years]. The median body mass index was 24.45 kg/m2 and IQR was (22.93, 25.93) kg/m2. The median time between ACL revision and reconstruction was 41 months and IQR was (15, 85) months. The direct cause of the failure of reconstruction surgery included 14 cases of trauma, 8 cases of no obvious cause, and 2 cases of infection. During the revision operation, 14 patients had a poor bone tunnel position, all of which were drilled with new tunnels, the remaining 10 patients were freshly modified on the basis of the original bone tunnel. Seventeen patients used autogenous tendon revision, 7 patients used LARS ligament; 16 patients had cartilage injury. The Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the Tegner sports rating score were used for functional evaluation before operation, at 1 year after operation, and at last follow-up. The Likert satisfaction score was recorded at last follow-up.ResultsPatients were followed up with a median time of 47 months and IQR was (32, 61) months. The Lysholm score, IKDC score, and Tegner sports rating score were significantly improved at 1 year after operation and at last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between at last follow-up and at 1 year after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the median Likert satisfaction score was 4.0 and IQR was (3.0, 4.5). According to the presence or absence of cartilage damage and the type of graft, the above scores at last follow-up were compared between the groups, and the differences were not significant (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 2 patients had graft fractures due to trauma again, and autogenous iliac bones were taken to fill the bone tunnel, and the second stage was revised; the rest of the patients recovered satisfactorily.ConclusionWith preoperative identification of the cause of ACL reconstruction failure, the stability and function of knee joint can be significantly improved by selecting appropriate bone tunnels and grafts during the revision and by active rehabilitation exercises.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision in the treatment of patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased posterior tibial slope (PTS). Methods The clinical data of 9 patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased PTS (≥17°) who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 1 female; the age ranged from 21 to 42 years, with a median age of 30 years. Lachman test was positive in 9 patients. Pivot-shift test was negative in 6 cases, degree Ⅰ positive in 2 cases, and degree Ⅱ positive in 1 case. The PTS was (17.78±1.09)° and the anterior tibial translation (ATT) was (11.58±1.47) mm. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 51.0±3.8, Lysholm score was 49.7±4.6, and Tegner score was 3.7±0.7. The time from primary reconstruction to revision was 12-33 months, with an average of 19.6 months. Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and ACL revision were performed. The improvement of knee function was evaluated by IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score; Lachman test and Pivot-shift test were used to evaluate the stability of knee joint. PTS and ATT were measured to observe the morphological changes of knee joint. Results All the incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complication such as incision infection, fat liquefaction, necrosis, deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities, and neurovascular injury. All 9 patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 25.8 months. At last follow-up, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative. IKDC score was 85.0±4.0, Lysholm score was 87.7±2.8, Tegner score was 6.8±0.7, PTS reduced to (9.89±0.60)°, and ATT shortened to (0.91±0.29) mm, which were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). ConclusionSlope-reducing tibial osteotomy and ACL revision in the treatment of patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased PTS has a satisfactory short-term effectiveness. It can improve the stability of knee joint and maintain the normal shape of knee joint.
ObjectiveTo evaluate short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant.MethodsA clinical data of 23 patients (24 knees) who underwent revision TKA by using porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant between March 2015 and April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males (8 knees) and 15 females (16 knees). The age ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean, 65.4 years). The cause of revision TKA included infection in 14 knees, aseptic loosening in 8 knees, instability in 1 knee, and stiff knee in 1 knee. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. The femoral defect was rated as type ⅡA in 5 knees, type ⅡB in 17 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees; the tibial defect was rated as type ⅡA in 2 knees, type ⅡB in 20 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees. The mean time between primary TKA and revision TKA was 30.6 months (range, 6-86 months). The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was (56.0±24.9)°. The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) total score was 41.9±14.2; and the pain and function scores were 8.5±5.2 and 33.4±13.5, respectively.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 25.6 months). The mean operation time was 2.2 hours (range, 1.6-2.9 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 580 mL (range, 400-1 000 mL). There were 2 knees (8.3%) of intraoperative fracture associated with Sleeve insertion and 1 knee (4.2%) of acute postoperative infection at 25 days after revision TKA. All incisions healed by first intention. No deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. X-ray film showed that all implants were stable. At last follow-up, slight discomfort after exercise occurred in 4 knees (16.7%); end-of-stem pain in the tibia occurred in 1 knee (4.2%). The ROM was (114.6±5.1)°, which had significant improvement compared with the preoperative result (t=11.698, P=0.000). The HSS total score (89.0±10.9), pain score (26.9±6.6), and function score (62.1±5.8) also had significant improvement compared with the preoperative results (t=15.616, P=0.000; t=12.522, P=0.000; t=10.076, P=0.000).ConclusionThe porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant in revision TKA has a significant improvement in short-term effectiveness and no signs of implant loosening.