Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) assisted by transradial approach and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) three-dimensional vascular reconstruction in the treatment of primary liver cancer. Methods The clinical data of 124 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent precision TACE via radial artery in our hospital from May 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected. Results Among the 124 patients, 118 patients were successfully punctured through the left radial artery and completed the TACE operation. The operation time was (109.57±31.32) min, and the median of postoperative hospitalization was 3 d. One patient changed to the right radial artery to complete TACE due to chronic renal failure and left brachial artery and vein puncture and catheterization before operation. The operation time was 119 minutes, and the patient was discharged after 5 days of hospitalization. After successful puncture of the left radial artery in one patient, the forearm artery was twisted into a loop and the guide wire catheter failed to pass, and the right femoral artery was used to complete TACE. The operation time was 123 minutes, and the patient was discharged after 4 days of improvement. The radial artery puncture was unsuccessful in four patients, and the right femoral artery approach was used to complete the operation; the operation time was (111.66±32.77) min, and the median of postoperative hospitalization was 3 d. One of the patients successfully completed up to 5 consecutive TACE via the radial artery. All patients underwent precision TACE with superselective cannulation assisted by CBCT three-dimensional vascular reconstruction. No vascular injury andocclusion, urinary retention, subcutaneous hemorrhage, and other complications occurred in all patients. Conclusions Trans-radial arterial precision TACE is safe and effective, which can be repeated many times and has few complications and high patient comfort. It can be used as one of the routine approaches of TACE.
Objective To summarize the experience of l iving donor l iver transplantation using cryopreserved il iac vein for middle hepatic vein reconstruction. Methods Between July 2006 and June 2009, right l iver transplantation without middle hepatic vein was performed in 37 cases of 85 patients undergoing l iving donor l iver transplantation; of 37 cases, 30 received middle hepatic vein reconstruction using cryopreserved il iac vein. There were 27 males and 3 females, aged from 10 to 57 years (median, 44 years). Thirty cases included 11 hepatocellular carcinoma, 10 hepatic cirrhosis, 2 Wilson’ sdisease, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 hepatoblastoma, 1 congenital hepatic fibrosis, 1 chronic severe hepatitis, and 1 congenital bil iary atresia. Il iac veins harvested from donors were put into 0-4℃ mixed antibiotics sal ine and transported to the operating room. The il iac veins were trimmed, placed into sterile bags (containing RMPI 1640 + 20% DMSO + 10% calf protein solution) and frozen at —70 . In l iving donor l iver transplantation process, the veins were melt and used for middle hepatic vein reconstruction. After operation, the patency of veins was monitored by regular Doppler ultrasound examination or enhanced CT for 3 months. Results In 30 patients, 30 il iac veins were used. The average cryopreserve time was 14 days (range, 3-44 days). Anastomosis were all successful; after cryopreservation, the blood vessels texture and elasticity were fit for surgery. No easily tearing or severe suture bleeding was observed. In 30 patients, 6 had segment V veins reconstruction; 3 had segment VIII; and 21 had both segments V and VIII. The patency rate of reconstructed vessels was 93% at 1 week, 90% at 2 weeks, 90% at 1 month, and 67% at 3 months. No serious compl ication was observed in donors. The prognosis was good with no small-for-size syndrome. Conclusion Cryopreserved il iac vein is an ideal material for the right hepatic l iving donor l iver transplantation in the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein.
To discuss renovascular reconstruction during l iving related donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Methods Seventy-seven cases of LDKT from April 2006 to March 2008 were retrospectively analyzed, including 63 cases in single renal artery group and 14 cases in multi ple artery group. In multi ple artery group, there were 3 cases of three arteries and 11 cases of double arteries; 9 cases of donated left kidneys and 5 cases of donated right kidneys. Potential donors underwent fully medical evaluation before operation, including donor-reci pient human leucocyte antigen matchingand a cross match test. The donor’s operation of the incision either underneath the 12th rib approaching the dorsal lumbar was performed and the transplantation operation adopted the extraperitoneal approach in the contralateral fossa il iac. The arteries in the multiple artery group were implanted onto the external (or common) il iac artery different from the orthodox method. Results In multiple artery group, no blood transfusion during operation was performed, no compl ication occurred after operation and all donors were discharged after 7-9 days of postoperation. After a follow-up of 3 months to 1 year, all the recipients kept normal kidney function without renal tubule necrosis, renal artery embol ism, vascular stenosis, urinary fistula and ureter necrosis. The ultrasound examination showed that the transplanted kidney had good blood supply. There was no significant difference in the time of urine secretion, serum creatinine level after 1 week of operation, length of hospital ization between the multiple artery group and the single artery group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The accurate treatment of multiple artery anastomosis are critical for the safety of the LDKT.
Objective To determine the clinical effect of sequence and cross bypass or combined with endovascular procedure for mutilevelarterial occlusive disease of lower extremity so as to investigate the credibletreatment for mutilevel arterial occlusive disease of lower extremity. Methods Between April 2004 and July 2005， 11 patients （14 limbs）underwent sequence and cross bypass, thromboendarterectomy or combined with endovascular procedure. Among of them, 10 cases were male and 1 case was female, aging 62-79 years(mean 70.5 years), and including 8 cases of intermittent claudications (Fontaine stage Ⅱ), 3 cases of rest pain (Fontaine stage Ⅲ) and 1 case of toe ulcerwith gangrene (Fontaine stage Ⅳ). Colour Doppler ultrasonography showed that 14 lower limbswere diagnosed as having multilevel arterial occlusive disease and the preoperation and ankle brachial index(ABI) was 0.36±0.11 . Lower limb digital subtraction angiography(DSA) showed 3 cases of bilateral iliac artery stenosis，extrailiac artery occlusion and bilateral superficial femoral artery occlusions，1 case of right common iliac artery stenosis, extrailiac artery occlusion and bilateral superficial femoral artery occlusions and 8 cases of unilateral extrailiac artery stenosis and superficial femoral artery occlusions. Postoperation tests of DSA,colour Doppler ultrasonography and ABI were done to observe cumulative patency rate after operation. Results The follow-up period was from 3 to 26 months(mean 14.5 months ). All patients survived. The symptoms of intermittent claudication and rest pain disappeard in all patients. ABI was improved by0.89±0.13 after procedure（Ｐlt;0.01）. The overall salvage rate of limb was 100%. DSA was performed from 3 to 280 days after operation, the overall primary graft patency rate was 92.86%（13/14）.Conclusion Sequence and cross bypass， thromboendarterectomy or combined with endovascular procedure in treatment of mutilevel occlusive disease of lower extremity was effective, less invasive and safe.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the learning curve of radical hepatectomy combined with vascular and/or bile duct reconstruction (RHVBR) in the treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE), and to explore the feasibility and safety of RHVBR. MethodsThe clinical data of 203 patients who received RHVBR treatment for HAE complicated with vascular invasion in West China Hospital from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) were used to analyze the learning curve of RHVBR, determine the learning stage, and compare the differences of intraoperative and postoperative outcome indexes in different learning stages. ResultsThe average operative time was (537.9±207.6) minutes, with blood loss amounted to 617.3 (138.9, 1 094.2) mL. Postoperative complications occurred in 65 cases, and the incidence of complications was 32.0%. Among them, 29 cases (14.3%) had serious complications. Three cases (1.5%) died within 90 days after operation. The results of RA-CUSUM analysis showed that 54 cases of surgery were the cut-off point of learning curve for serious postoperative complications. According to the results of CUSUM analysis, the whole queue was divided into the first stage (n=53) and the second stage (n=150) based on the completion of 53 operations. Compared with the first stage, the operative time and total postoperative hospital stay in the second stage was shortened, the incidence of serious complications was reduced, and the number of resected liver segments was increased. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionIt is feasible and safe to treat HAE with RHVBR, and the incidence of serious complications is obviously reduced after 54 cases of operation.
Objective To review various kinds of therapeutic methods for restenosis after reconstructive vascular operation. Methods The literatures about prevention and treatment for restenosis after reconstructive vascular operation were reviewed. Results Therapeutic methods for vascular restenosis include gene therapy, drug treatment, placing external stent around the vein graft and physical therapy. The methods of gene therapy include transferring genes that inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) and inactivating genes that promote the proliferation of VSMC through technology of antisensenucleic acids or RNA interference. Conclusion Current treatment for restenosis after reconstructive varscular operation have both advantages and disadvantages, some of which are still being disputed. With the development of the technology of molecular biology, gene therapy would be the most effective therapy method for vascular restenosis.