• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "胸腰椎骨折" 55 results
        • BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON ADJACENT UPPER AND LOWER AND UNILATERAL FRACTURED VERTEBRAL PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION IN TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURE

          ObjectiveTo investigate the stability of unilateral fractured vertebral pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. MethodsEighteen fresh calf thoracolumbar spine specimens (T11-L3) were obtained to establish the L1 burst fracture models with Panjabi's high speed trauma apparatus, and were divided into 3 groups:pedicle fixation for adjacent upper and lower vertebrae of fractured vertebra (4 pedicle screws in group A), combined with pedicle screw fixation for unilateral fractured vertebrae (5 pedicle screws in group B), and three-level 6 pedicle fixation (group C). Under normal, fractured, and reconstructed conditions, the range of motion (ROM) of adjacent upper and lower vertebrae of fractured vertebra were measured in flexion, extension, bilateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial stiffness under flexion-compression was measured on the MTS-858 testing system. ResultsThere was no significant difference in ROM and axial stiffness under normal and fractured conditions in all directions among groups (P<0.05), indicating load balance in the groups. ROM of groups B and C were significantly less than that of group A under reconstructed condition in all directions (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between group B and group C (P>0.05). Biomechanical test showed that group B was significantly higher than group A in the axial stiffness value (P<0.05), but difference was not significant between group B and group C (P>0.05). ConclusionTranspedicular fixation of fractured vertebrae can enhance the stability of the spine. Both unilateral and bilateral fractured vertebral pedicle screw fixations have the same stability.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Surgical treatment of delayed spinal cord injury caused by atypical compression of old thoracolumbar fractures

          ObjectiveTo explore the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment strategies of delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) caused by atypical compression of old thoracolumbar fracture.MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2018, 32 patients with delayed SCI caused by atypical compression of old thoracolumbar fracture who met the inclusion criteria were admitted and divided into group A (20 cases, underwent anterior subtotal vertebral body resection+titanium mesh reconstruction+screw rod internal fixation) and group B (12 cases, underwent posterior 270° ring decompression of vertebral canal+titanium mesh reconstruction+screw rod internal fixation) according to the different operation approaches. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, cause of injury, fracture segment, disease duration, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, and preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, kyphosis angle, and vertebral canal occupational ratio (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and bone fusion time of reconstructed vertebrae were recorded and compared between the two groups; the kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsExcept that the incision length in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (t=?4.865, P=0.000), there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no deaths or postoperative paraplegia cases in the two groups, and no deep infection or skin infection occurred. There was 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 case of inferior vena cava injury, and 1 case of chyle leakage in group A. No serious complications occurred in group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.274). All 32 patients were followed up 12-61 months, with an average of 20.8 months. The follow-up time for groups A and B were (19.35±5.30) months and (23.25±12.20) months respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=?1.255, P=0.219). The reconstructed vertebrae in all cases obtained bony fusion postoperatively. The fusion time of groups A and B were (8.85±2.27) months and (8.50±2.50) months respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=0.406, P=0.688). The kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score of the two groups at each time point after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperatively (P<0.05); the lumbar JOA score was further improved with time postoperatively (P<0.05), while the kyphosis angle and the VAS score of back pain remained similarly (P>0.05). Comparison of kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score between the two groups at various time points postoperatively showed no significant difference (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the JOA score improvement rate in groups A and B were 83.87%±0.20% and 84.50%±0.14%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=–0.109, P=0.914); the surgical treatment effects of the two groups were judged to be significant.ConclusionIn the later stage of treatment of old thoracolumbar fractures, even mild kyphosis and spinal canal occupying may induce delayed SCI. Surgical correction and decompression can significantly promote the recovery of damaged spinal cord function. Compared with anterior approach surgery, posterior approach surgery has the advantages of less trauma, convenient operation, and fewer complications, so it can be preferred.

          Release date:2021-08-30 02:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Short-term effectiveness comparison between robotic-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

          ObjectiveTo compare short-term effectiveness between robot-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 52 cases of thoracolumbar fracture without neurological injury symptoms admitted between January 2018 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into minimally invasive group (24 cases, treated with robot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation) and open group (28 cases, treated with traditional open internal fixation). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the general data such as gender, age, cause of injury, fracture segment, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS), preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, fixed segment height, and fixed segment kyphosis Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of the two groups were recorded and compared; as well as the VAS score, ODI score, fixed segment height, and fixed segment kyphosis Cobb angle of the two groups before operation and at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 10 months after operation. CT scan was reexamined at 1-3 days after operation, and the pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate was determined and calculated according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard.ResultsThe operation time of the minimally invasive group was significantly longer than that of the open group, but the intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than those of the open group (P<0.05). There were 132 pedicle screws and 158 pedicle screws implanted in the minimally invasive group and the open group respectively. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard, the accuracy of pedicle screws was 97.7% (129/132) and 96.8% (153/158), respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.505, P=0.777). The patients in both groups were followed up 10 months, and there was no rejection or internal fixation fracture. In the minimally invasive group, the internal fixator was removed at 10 months after operation, but not in the open group. The VAS score, ODI score, fixed segment heigh, and fixed segment kyphotic Cobb angle of the two groups were improved in different degrees when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). Except that the VAS score and ODI score of the minimally invasive group were significantly better than those of the open group at 3 days after operation (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05).ConclusionRobot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures has significant advantages in intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and early postoperative effectiveness and other aspects, and the effect of fracture reduction is good.

          Release date:2020-02-18 09:10 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods for thoracolumbar fractures

          ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods for thoracolumbar fractures. MethodsThe clinical data of 94 patients with single segment thoracolumbar fracture who underwent percutaneous pedicle fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods between October 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of intravertebral allograft, they were divided into group A (bone grafting by Jack dilator, 40 cases) and group B (bone grafting by funnel, 54 cases). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in the gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, injured segment, Wolter index, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, injured vertebral height ratio, and Cobb angle. The operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, allograft volume, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score of low back pain was used to evaluate the remission of clinical symptoms before operation, at 3 days, 3 months, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The injured vertebral height ratio and Cobb angle were measured before operation, at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after operation. ResultsThe operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, and allograft volume in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P<0.05). No complication occurred after operation, such as loosening or fracture of internal fixation. And bone grafting in the injured vertebrae healed at last follow-up. The VAS score, injured vertebral height ratio, and Cobb angle at each postoperative time point significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); compared with 3 days postoperatively, the VAS score improved further after 3 months, but the injured vertebral height ratio decreased and the Cobb angle increased, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS scores of low back pain between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05); the injured vertebrae height ratio in group A was significantly higher than that in group B, and the Cobb angle was significantly lower than that in group B, all showing significant differences (P<0.05). ConclusionThe intravertebral allograft via Jack dilator can restore the height and decrease the Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae, but accompanied with higher fluoroscopy frequency and longer operation time when compared with funnel bone grafting. For patients with single level thoracolumbar fractures, intravertebral allograft via Jack dilator is recommended.

          Release date:2021-10-28 04:29 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Effectiveness of sagittal top compression reduction technique in treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

          ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of sagittal top compression reduction technique in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 59 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures who met the selection criteria and were admitted between November 2018 and January 2022. Among them, 34 patients were treated with sagittal top compression reduction technique (top pressure group), and 25 patients were treated with traditional reduction technique (traditional group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, fracture segment, cause of injury, AO classification of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, surgical approach, preoperative vertebral body index, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, injured vertebra angle, segmental kyphosis angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of complications between the two groups were recorded and compared. After operation, VAS score and ODI were used to evaluate effectiveness, and X-ray and CT examinations were performed to measure imaging indicators such as vertebral body index, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, injured vertebra angle, and segmental kyphosis angle. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). No complication such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury was found during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. Patients in both groups were followed up 6-48 months, with an average of 20.6 months. No loosening, breakage, or failure of internal fixation occurred during follow-up. The imaging indicators, VAS score, and ODI of the two groups significantly improved at 1 week and last follow-up when compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the VAS score and ODI further significantly improved when compared to 1 week after operation (P<0.05). At 1 week after operation and last follow-up, the vertebral body index, segmental kyphosis angle, injured vertebra angle, and ODI in the top pressure group were significantly better than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score and height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra between the two groups at 1 week after operation (P>0.05), but the two indicators in the top pressure group were significantly better than those in the traditional group at last follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusion The treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with sagittal top compression reduction technique can significantly improve the quality of vertebral reduction, and is superior to traditional reduction techniques in relieving pain and improving spinal function.

          Release date:2023-10-11 10:17 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Treatment of chronic thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures combined with kyphosis with cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw and multiple level Schwab grade Ⅰ osteotomy

          ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw combined with multiple level Schwab grade Ⅰ osteotomy for chronic thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures with kyphosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 27 patients with symptomatic chronic thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures combined with kyphosis treated between June 2015 and June 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, there were 8 males and 19 females, with an average age of 69.5 years (range, 56-81 years). The damage segment (kyphosis vertex) included T11 in 4 cases, T12 in 12 cases, L1 in 10 cases, and L2 in 1 case. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 21 months, with an average of 12.5 months. The T value of lumbar vertebral bone mineral density ranged from ?4.9 to ?2.5, with an average value of ?3.61. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification was used to evaluate spinal cord injury, there were 1 case of grade D and 26 cases of grade E. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), kyphosis Cobb angle of fracture site, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) data were obtained before operation, at 2 weeks after operation, 3 months after operation, and last follow-up, to evaluate the quality of life and improvement of sagittal spine parameters.ResultsNo complications related to pedicle screw and bone cement occurred. The incisions healed by first intention in 26 cases, and 1 incision healed after dressing change due to poor blood glucose control. There were no complications such as bedsore, hypostatic pneumonia, or deep venous thrombosis. All patients were followed up 8-24 months, with an average of 16.6 months. The VAS score, ODI score, Cobb angle, and SVA were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle between each time point after operation (P>0.05); the VAS score and ODI score at 3 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly better than those at 2 weeks after operation (P<0.05), and the ODI score at last follow-up was further improved when compared with the score at 3 months (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS score (P>0.05); SVA at last follow-up was significantly worse than that at 2 weeks and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between at 2 weeks and 3 months after operation (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as pedicle screw loosening, breakage or cutting, adjacent vertebral fracture, proximal junctional kyphosis, and so on.ConclusionFor the chronic thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures combined with kyphosis, the cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw and multiple level Schwab grade Ⅰ osteotomy has the advantages of less operation trauma, quick recovery, and remarkable effectiveness.

          Release date:2021-01-07 04:59 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF LONG- AND SHORT-SEGMENT POSTERIOR PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION FOR THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURE

          Objective To compare the effectiveness of long- and short-segment posterior pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2009, 58 patients with AO type B thoracolumbar fracture underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation. Of 58 patients, 36 received short-segment pedicle fixation (1 upper and 1 lower vertebral bodies of the fractured vertebral body) in group A, and 22 received long-segment pedicle fixation (2 upper and 2 lower vertebral bodies of the fractured vertebral body) in group B. There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury cause, fracture site, preoperative Frankel grade, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, complication, anterior vertebra compression rate (AVCR), and Cobb angle were compared between 2 groups. Frankel grade was used to evaluate the neurological function. Results The operation time and blood loss of group B were significantly higher than those of group A (P lt; 0.05). All incisions obtained primary healing. The patients were followed up 17.2 months on average (range, 12-32 months). No complication occurred in the other patients except 1 case having internal fixation failure and 1 case having aggravated kyphosis deformity in group A. The neurological function recovered in a certain degree; Frankel grade at 3 months was significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (P lt; 0.05) in 2 groups, but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (Z=0.09, P=0.36). The AVCR and Cobb angle were significantly lower in 2 groups at immediately after operation and last follow-up than those before operation (P lt; 0.05). The correction rates of AVCR and Cobb angle in group B were significantly higher than those in group A (P lt; 0.05); whereas the correction losses of AVCR and Cobb angle in group B were significantly less than those in group A (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Long-segment pedicle screw fixation is better than short-segment pedicle screw fixation in the correction of kyphosis and recovery of vertebra body height, especially in the prevention of correction loss in long-term follow-up although it will increase the blood loss and operation time.

          Release date:2016-08-31 04:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • AF釘棒系統內固定治療胸腰椎骨折伴截癱

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar fractures

          ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar fractures.MethodsFrom January 2017 to January 2020, a total of 68 thoracolumbar fracture patients undergoing anterior approach surgery were included and randomly divided into TXA group (n=33) and control group (n=35). Patients in the TXA group were given a dose of 15 mg/kg of TXA by intravenous infusion during 30 min before skin incision and an additional 15 mg/kg of TXA intravenously at 8 h after the first infusion, while the ones in the control group were given 15 mg/kg of normal saline at the same time. Basic data of the patients were collected. The hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, coagulation and fibrinolysis indexes of the patients were monitored preoperatively, 24-hour postoperatively, and 72-hour postoperatively. The intraoperative blood loss and wound drainage of the patients were recorded. The incidence of blood transfusion and thrombotic events were collected. Statistical analysis was performed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, operation time, fracture location distribution, anesthesia classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists, neurologic grade of American Spinal Injury Association, injury time, or length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the total blood loss [(1 398.49±312.24) vs. (1 642.30±357.78) mL, P=0.003], intraoperative blood loss [(432.83±74.76) vs. (486.31±86.51) mL, P=0.008], and wound drainage [(276.73±89.42) vs. (389.24±125.71) mL, P<0.001] in the TXA group reduced. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the preoperative hemoglobin or hematocrit (P>0.05), but the 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin concentration [(112.67±20.59) vs. (102.64±19.41) g/L, P=0.042] and hematocrit [(32.25±4.12)% vs. (30.13±4.28)%, P=0.042] in the TXA group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion in the TXA group was lower than that in the control group (6.1% vs. 25.7%, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative, 24-hour postoperative, or 72-hour postoperative prothrombin time, international standardized ratio, activated partial prothrombin time, platelet count, fibrinogen, d-dimer, or fibrinogen degradation products between the two groups (P>0.05), and no thrombotic complications were found.ConclusionTXA has good efficacy and safety in the anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar fractures.

          Release date:2020-11-25 07:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Meta-analysis of the long-term efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral screw fixation on thoracolumbar single vertebral fracture

          ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term effect of unilateral versus bilateral screw placement on thoracolumbar single vertebral fracture by means of meta-analysis.MethodsThe data of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, SinoMed, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, PubMed, Elsevier Science Direct, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Springer Link were searched by computer, and the literatures related to effect comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar single vertebral fracture were collected, including domestic and foreign published journal literatures and grey literatures such as academic conference reports and dissertations. The retrieval time was from their inception to August 17, 2019. After literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction, Stata 12.0 and RevMan 5.0 softwares were used for data analysis.ResultsA total of 12 articles were included, including 7 in English and 5 in Chinese, with a total of 848 patients (424 in the unilateral pediclescrew fixation group and 424 in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation group). The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in any of the main outcome indicators between the two groups, including the ratio of anterior height of fractured vertebra [mean difference (MD)= ?0.16%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (?1.20%, 0.88%), P=0.76], postoperative follow-up Cobb angle [MD=?0.17°, 95%CI (?0.50, 0.15)°, P=0.29], postoperative follow-up Visual Analogue Scale score [MD=?0.06, 95%CI (?0.16, 0.04), P=0.24], postoperative follow-up Oswestry Disability Index score [MD=?0.28, 95%CI (?0.66, 0.11), P=0.15], and incidence of complications [relative risk=0.81, 95%CI (0.57, 1.15), P=0.23], but two secondary outcome indicators namely operation time [MD=?33.26 minutes, 95%CI (?51.72, ?14.80) minutes, P=0.000 4] in the unilateral pedicle screw fixation group were smaller than those in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation group, whlie there were no statistically significant difference in postoperative length of hospital stay [MD=?1.59 days, 95%CI (?4.53, 1.36) days, P=0.29] and intraoperative blood loss [MD=?74.09 mL, 95%CI (?155.96, 7.77) mL, P=0.08] between the two groups.ConclusionUnilateral and bilateral screw placement of thoracolumbar single vertebral fracture has the same long-term effect, and unilateral screw placement can reduce the number of screw implantation, and shorter operation time, which is more in line with the actual clinical needs.

          Release date:2020-02-24 05:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        6 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 6 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜