目的 探討后路手術中360°植骨融合術治療腰椎滑脫癥的近期療效。 方法 2008年1月－2011年2月收治39例腰椎滑脫癥患者，男21例，女18例；年齡35～75歲，平均51歲。病程12～50個月，平均31個月。滑脫部位：腰3 1例，腰4 11例，腰5 24例，腰4、5 3例。腰椎退變性滑脫27例，峽部裂性滑脫12例。按Meyerding分度：Ⅰ度21例，Ⅱ度13例，Ⅲ度5例。患者均有腰腿痛癥狀，保守治療無效后行后路減壓、復位及椎弓根釘棒系統內固定，術中以360°行椎間及后外側三維立體植骨融合，在椎體前中柱采用植骨加椎間融合器的融合方式。術后定期隨訪，攝X線片檢測融合情況，使用視覺模擬疼痛（VAS）評分評估癥狀緩解情況，Greenough-Fraser綜合評分評價腰腿痛治療結果。 結果 有36例患者獲隨訪，隨訪時間12～36個月，平均24個月。植骨愈合率100%，愈合時間10～18個月，平均14個月。無內固定松動、斷裂、外露及脫落等并發癥發生。術前下肢神經根痛VAS評分為（7.52 ± 1.23）分，末次隨訪時為（1.67 ± 1.18）分；下腰痛術前（6.83 ± 1.51）分，末次隨訪時為（1.11 ±0.76）分；手術前后比較差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。Greenough-Fraser綜合評分術前為（24 ± 7）分，末次隨訪時為（55 ± 4）分，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 360°植骨融合術治療腰椎滑脫癥是一種確實有效的融合方法，利于提高相應區域的植骨融合率及恢復椎間隙高度，使融合更穩定。
To evaluate the method and effectiveness of anterior focus clearance with autograft bone fusion and internal fixation in treating of adjacent multivertebral tuberculosis in one-stage. Methods Between March 2007 and September 2009, 8 cases of thoracic vertebra tuberculosis were treated. Of 8 cases, 6 were male and 2 were female, aged 32 years on average (range, 20-42 years). The disease duration ranged from 8 to 14 months (mean, 10.2 months). Affected vertebrae included thoracic vertebrae in 35 cases and lumbar vertebrae in 11 cases; 5 vertebrae were involved in 4 cases, 6 vertebrae in 3 cases, and 8 vertebrae in 1 case. According to Frankel classification, there were 2 cases of grade C, 4 cases of grade D, and 2 cases of grade E. All patients had different kyphosis with the Cobb angle of (25.1 ± 6.6)°. All patients received antituberculous therapy 4-6 weeks preoperatively; after complete clearance lesions, autograft bone fusion and internal fixation were performed, and then antituberculous therapy was given for 18 months. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Eight patients were followed up 18-48 months (mean, 29 months). According to JIN Dadi et al. criterion, 7 cases recovered after first operation, 1 case of relapsed tuberculosis with sious was cured after re-focus clearance. The Cobb angle was (19.5 ± 4.2)° at 7 days after operation and was (22.3 ± 3.6)° at last follow-up, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The nerve function of all cases were classified as Frankel grade E. CT scan showed bone graft fusion at 6-8 months after operation. No loosening or displacement of grafted bone and internal fixation occurred during follow-up. Conclusion The treatment of adjacent multivertebral tuberculosis by anterior focus clearance, intervertebral autograft, and internal fixation in one-stage is effective. Anterior bone fusion and internal fixation in one-stage can correct kyphosis effectively and rebuild spinal stabil ity, so it is a good choice for surgical treatment of adjacent multivertebral tuberculosis.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness and feasibil ity of modified single-stage transpedicular decompression, debridement, and posterior instrumentation in treatment of thoracic tuberculosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2009, 22 cases of thoracic tuberculosis were treated with modified single-stage transpedicular decompression, debridement, and posterior instrumentation. There were 12 males and 10 females with an average age of 39.4 years (range, 22-52 years). The mean disease duration was 1.2 years (range, 3 months to 10 years). The involved vertebral bodies were T5-12, including 2 segments in 17 cases and 3 segments in 5 cases. The kyphosis Cobb angle was (31.2 ± 14.5)° before operation. According to Frankel score system for neurological deficits, 2 cases were classified as grade A, 1 case as grade B, 8 cases as grade C, 5 cases as grade D, 1 case as grade E, and 5 cases had no neurological deficits before operation. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 22.2 months on average (range, 12-65 months). Pain in low back was rel ieved in varying degrees 2 weeks after operation. Fusion was achieved in the bone implant area at 3 months after operation. According to Frankel score system, 1 case was rated as grade B, 2 cases as grade C, 4 cases as grade D, 7 cases as grade E, and 8 cases had no neurological deficits at last follow-up. The kyphosis Cobb angle was (16.2 ± 3.6)°, showing significant difference when compared with the value before operation (t=5.952, P=0.001). No loosening, emersion, breakage of internal fixation or pneumothorax occurred 1 year after operation. Conclusion Single-stage transpedicular decompression and posterior instrumentation is an effective and safe method in treatment of thoracic tuberculosis.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using zero-profile anchored cage (ZAC) in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis, by comparing with plate-cage construct (PCC). Methods A clinical data of 65 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. During consecutive three-level ACDF, 35 patients were fixed with ZAC (ZAC group) and 30 patients with PCC (PCC group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), cervical lordosis, and surgical segmental angle. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical indicators (JOA score, NDI, VAS score), and radiological indicators (cervical lordosis, surgical segmental angle, implant subsidence, surgical segment fusion, and adjacent segment degeneration), and the postoperative complications [swelling of the neck (PSTT), dysphagia] were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 24-39 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up duration between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in ZAC group than in PCC group, and the length of hospital stay was longer, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). At each time point after operation, both groups showed significant improvements in JOA score, VAS score, and NDI compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Both groups showed an increase in PSTT at 3 days and 3, 6 months after operation compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but returned to preoperative levels at last follow-up (P>0.05). The PSTT at 3 days and 3 months after operation were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The incidences of dysphagia at 3 days and 3 months were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed at 6 months and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no postoperative complication in both groups including hoarseness, esophageal injury, cough, or hematoma. Both groups showed improvement in cervical lordosis and surgical segmental angle compared to preoperative levels, with a trend of loss during follow-up. The cervical lordosis loss and surgical segmental angle loss were significantly more in the ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). The incidence of implante subsidence was significantly higher in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ZAC group and PCC group in the incidences of surgical segment fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (P>0.05). ConclusionIn consecutive three-level ACDF, both ZAC and PCC can achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, while the latter can better maintain cervical curvature and reduce the incidence of implant subsidence.
Objective To assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective study was made on 48 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent anterior decompression and fusion with n-HA/PA66 cage between August 2008 and January 2010. There were 33 males and 15 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 42-72 years). The disease duration was 3-12 months (mean, 6 months). The affected segments included 35 cases of single segment (C3, 4 in 7, C4, 5 in 18, and C5, 6 in 10) and 13 cases of double segments (C3-5 in 7 and C4-6 in 6). Of 48 patients, 28 was diagnosed as having intervertebral disc protrusion, 12 as having ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, and 8 as having vertebral osteophyte; 35 patients underwent single segmental anterior corpectomy and fusion, and 13 patients underwent single segmental anterior discectomy and fusion. The pre- and post-operative radiographs (cervical anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and three-dimensional CT scans) were taken to measure the segmental height and lordosis angle. Brantigan et al assessment standard and visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the graft fusion and the improvement of clinical symptoms, respectively. Results All patients were followed up for 46 months on average (range, 36-54 months). No cage breaking, displacement, or sliding was found. At last follow-up, 36 cases were rated as Brantigan grade E, 10 cases as grade D, and 2 cases as grade C; the fusion rate was 96%. Both segmental height and lordosis angle were corrected significantly at immediate and 6 months after operation and last follow-up than those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found among different time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the cage subsidence was (1.3 ± 1.0) mm. The VAS and JOA scores at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05), and the scores at last follow-up were superior to ones at 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with the n-HA/PA66 cage in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy is satisfactory because it can effectively restore and maintain segmental height and lordosis angle and promote osseous fusion.
Objective To study the cl inical effects of modified Galveston technology in the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis. Methods From January 2001 to May 2008, 19 patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis were treated, including13 males and 6 females aged 21-58 years old (average 38 years old). The course of disease was 8-22 months. The tuberculosis was at the L4-S1 level in 3 cases, the L5, S1 level in 10 cases, the L5-S2 level in 5 cases, and the S1, 2 level in 1 case. Seven cases were compl icated with neural symptom of the lower l imbs, 3 cases of them were grade C and 4 cases were grade D according to the Frankel scale of nerve function. The preoperative JOA score of lower back pain was 5-22 (average 19). Six cases were compl icated with il iac abscess, 3 cases with psoas abscess, 3 cases with sacroil iac joint tuberculosis, and 2 cases with pulmonary tuberculosis. For 12 patients, the operation of modified Galveston internal fixation via the posterior approach, focus debridement via vertebral canal, and interbody fusion with autogeneous il iac bone fragment grafting was performed; for 7 cases, the operation of modified Galveston internal fixation via the posterior approach, vertebral lamina fusion with autogeneous il iac bone fragment grafting, and anterior focus debridement was performed. Results The incision of 18 cases was healed by first intention, and 1 case had sinus 3 weeks after operation and healed 3 months after operation. Nineteen patients were followed up for 12-82 months (average 21 months). There was no recurrence of the local tuberculosis, and the common toxic symptom of tuberculosis disappeared 6-12 months after operation. All the patients achieved bony fusion 4-6 months postoperatively, and 3 patients with sacroil iac joint tuberculosis achieved sacroil iac joint fusion. For those 7 patients with combinations of the neural symptomof the lower l imbs, the symptoms disappeared and their Frankel scales were improved to grade E. The JOA score of low back pain at the final follow-up was 22-29 (average 26). There was a significant difference between preoperation and postoperation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The modified Galveston technology is helpful to reconstruct the stabil ity of lumbosacral vertebrae, improve bony fusion rate, reduce the postoperative in-bed time.
Objective To discuss the selection of anterior or posterior or a combination of anterior and posterior surgical treatment of lower cervical dislocation. Methods A retrospectively study was performed on 28 patients with lower cervical dislocation who received operative treatment between January 2005 and October 2008. There were 19 males and 9 femaleswith an average age of 38 years (range, 19-57 years), including 21 cases of fresh dislocation and 7 cases of old dislocation. The time from injury to hospitalization was 3 hours to 58 days. According to Allen classification, all cases had flexion injury, including 19 cases of degree I dislocation, 2 cases of degree II, 5 cases of degree III, and 2 cases of degree IV. At admission according to Frankel classification, 7 cases were rated as grade A, 4 as grade B, 9 as grade C, 3 as grade D, and 5 as grade E. All patients received open reduction, internal fixation, and il iac bone graft spinal fusion. Of them, combined anterior and posterior approach operation were given in 4 cases, single anterior operation in 22 cases, and single posterior operation in 2 cases. Results All operations were completed successfully and the spinal cord injury did not deteriorate after operation. Esophageal fistula occurred in 1 case receiving anterior approach operation and was cured after 1 month. Infection of wound occurred in 1 case and was cured after dressing change. The other incisions healed by first intention. One case (Frankel grade A) died of pulmonary infection 6 weeks after operation. Twenty-seven patients were followed up 21-38 months. Two cases suffered from shoulder pain 12 months after operation. X-ray films showed complete reduction, normal height of vertebral space and normal sequence of cervical spine after operation. All cases obtained bone fusion after 3.5-6.0 months of operation (4.2 months on average). Frankel grades were improved in different degrees after operation. Conclusion The operation plan of lower cervical dislocation should be determined by the neurologic status of the patient, and the classification of the injury as a unilateral or bilateral dislocation. Anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and fixation were available in the lower cervical dislocation.
Objictive To evaluate the efficacy of decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to April, 2006), EMBASE (1984 to April, 2006), the China Biological Medicine Database (to Dec., 2005), VIP (1989 to April, 2006) and hand-searched several related journals for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) involving the comparison of the outcomes between decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Seven studies involving 412 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that no statistically significant differences were observed between the two operative procedures in the cumulative clinical outcome (OR1.83, 95%CI 0.92, 3.41), incidence of postoperative leg pain (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.48, 2.25), incidence of perioperative complications (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.51, 2.60), incidence of re-operation (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.30, 1.56) or pre and postoperative pain scores [Pre-op WMD 0.12, 95%CI (-0.44,0.68); Post-op WMD 0.08, 95%CI (-1.08,1.25)]. The only statistical significance was observed in the incidence of postoperative back pain (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.14, 0.46). Four studies described the length of operation, the intraoperative blood loss, the duration of external fixation postoperative and the total cost in hospital, which revealed that decompression alone was superior to decompression plus fusion. Three studies described the relationships between the clinical outcome and the changes in segmental range of motion/disc height pre- and post-operatively, as well as the flexion-extension radiographs, which revealed that decompression plus fusion was superior to decompression alone. Conclusions There are no significant differences between the two procedures in clinical outcomes, incidences of postoperative leg pain, re-operation and complications. Decompression with fusion leads to fewer patients suffering from postoperative lumbago than that of decompression alone. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the radiographs may predict the clinical outcomes. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.