Minimally invasive cardiac surgeries are the trend in the future. Among them, robotic cardiac surgery is the latest iteration with several key-hole incision, 3-dimentional visualization, and articulated instrumentation of 7 degree of ergonomic freedom for those complex procedures in the heart. In particular, robotic mitral valve surgery, as well as coronary artery bypass grafting, has evolved over the last decade and become the preferred method at certain specialized centers worldwide because of excellent results. Other cardiac procedures are in various stages of evolution. Stepwise innovation of robotic technology will continue to make robotic operations simpler, more efficient, and less invasive, which will encourage more surgeons to take up this technology and extend the benefits of robotic surgery to a larger patient population.
ObjectiveTo investigate the perioperative results and safety of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) treatment of anterior descending artery disease through a small left thoracic incision assisted by thoracoscopy. MethodsThe clinical data of 92 patients who received MIDCAB in our hospital from May 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 72 (78.26%) males aged 42-78 (61.2±7.48) years, and 20 (21.74%) females aged 30-80 (61.30±12.26) years. The perioperative complications, blood product use, left heart function changes, ventilator use time, ICU stay, hospital stay and other indicators were analyzed. ResultsTwo (2.17%) patients were transferred to thoracotomy, 5 (5.43%) patients received blood products during the operation, 2 (2.17%) were subjected to secondary thoracotomy to stop bleeding, 4 (4.34%) had postoperative hypoxemia and 1 (1.08%) was reintubated. The ventilator use time was 3-227 (22.35±35.39) hours, the ICU stay was 16-777 (78.85±108.62) hours, and the postoperative hospital stay was 2-36 (8.86±6.05) days. One (1.08%) patient died in hospital. ConclusionMIDCAB for anterior descending artery disease has good perioperative results, especially for solitary anterior descending artery disease, which can reduce the use of blood products, and shorten the time of ventilator use after operation, ICU stay and hospital stay.
Objective To summarize the experience of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) on serious myocardium ischemia in early post CABG. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, emergency redo CABG was performed in 13 patients with serious early post operative myocardium ischemia. The causes included vein graft embolize(4 cases),uncompleted revascularize(3 cases), graft spasm(1 case) and anastomose stenosis or occlusion (5 cases). The grafts was 1 3(1.8±0.9) during redo CABG. Results There were 6 deaths, the mortality was 46%. The mean follow up was 31 months. There was no recurrence of angina. NYHA function was Ⅰ Ⅱ. Conclusion Emergency CABG is an important method in saving the patients with severe myocardium ischemia in early post CABG. The perioperative prevention and early treatment should be emphasized.
Objective To summarize experience in surgery about off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCAB)for the treatment of left main with three-vessel coronary disease. Methods OPCAB were perfomed in 33 patients of left main with three-vessel coronary disease. The left internal mammary artery(LIMA) was used to be the graft vessel to anastomose with left anterior descending. The saphenous vein was used to be the graft vessel to anastomose with left circumflex coronary artery, right coronary artery/posterior descend artery, diagonal branch, obtuse marginal branch. Results There was no operative death.The average number of grafting was 3.4 per case.There was no perioperative myocardial infarction, respiratory or hepatic or renal failure and other serious complications.Blood transfusion was not needed in 33% of cases.The angina pectoris was free after operation in all cases. Conclusions OPCAB is safe and effective for the treatment of left main with three-vessel coronary disease. The injuries were minimal. Preoperative preparation, using of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, operative matching, techniques and to create a skill and swift team for meet an emergency are the key factors to assure surgical outcome.
ObjectiveTo study the learning curve of minimal invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) and the influence on the perioperative clinical effects by analyzing operation time.MethodsFrom March 2012 to November 2020, 212 patients underwent MICS CABG by the same surgeon. Among them, 59 patients (52 males and average age of 62.89±8.27 years) with single vessel bypass grafting were as a single-vessel group and 153 patients (138 males, average age of 59.80±9.22 years) with multi-vessel bypass grafting were as a multi-vessel group. Two sets of operation time-operation sequence scatter plots were made and learning curve was analyzed by cumulative summation (CUSUM) and regression method of operation time. The surgical data of each group before and after the inflection point of the learning curve were compared with the main clinical outcome events within 30 days after surgery.ResultsThere was no death, perioperative myocardial infarction and stroke in 212 MICS CABG patients and no transfer to cardiopulmonary bypass or redo thoracotomy. The learning curve conformed to the cubic fitting formula. In the single-vessel group, CUSUM (x operation number)=–1.93+93.45×x–2.33×x2+0.01×x3, P=0.000, R2=0.986, the tipping point was 27 patients. In the multi-vessel group, CUSUM (x)=y=2.87+1.15×x–1.29× x2+3.463×x3, P=0.000, R2=0.993, and the tipping point was 59 patients. The two sets of case data were compared before and after the learning curve and there was no statistical difference in main clinical outcomes within 30 days (mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, perioperative blood transfusion rate), ventilator tube, and intensive care unit retention.ConclusionThe learning curve of MICS CABG conforms to the cubic formula, and the process transitions from single to multiple vessels bypass. To enter the mature stage of the learning phase, a certain number of patients need to be done. Reasonable surgical procedures and quality control measures can ensure the safety during the learning phase.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB)for high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD)patients with high European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE). MethodsA total of 211 CAD patients undergoing surgical treatment in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from June 2007 to July 2013 were enrolled into this study, including 52 patients receiving CABG and 159 patients receiving OPCAB. Predicted risk of operative mortality (PROM)of each patient was calculated by EuroSCORE. Patients with PROM≥6 were stratified into high-risk subgroups. Clinical outcomes were compared between CABG and OPCAB patients, as well as incidence of cardiovascular events, angina and stroke within 30 postoperative days in high-risk subgroup patients. ResultsOPCAB and CABG group patients had similar left main disease. There was no statistical difference in the number of distal anastomosis between OPCAB (2.75±0.82)and CABG group patients (2.83±0.58) (P > 0.05). Operation time[ (3.92±0.79)hour vs. (6.83±1.53)hour], thoracic drainage[ (983.14±802.39)ml vs. (1 620.40±879.32)ml], blood transfusion[ (1 289.30±668.08)ml vs. (2 325.30±491.98)ml], length of ICU stay[ (3.90±1.33)days vs. (5.08±1.78)days], and mechanical ventilation time[ (9.63±3.32)h vs. (13.76±3.79)h] of OPCAB group patients were significantly shorter or lower than those of CABG group patients (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality between OPCAB and CABG group patients (1.26% vs. 3.85%, P > 0.05). Among high-risk subgroup patients, the odds ratio of stroke within 30 postoperative days in CABG was 5.7 (95%CI 1.28-25.09, P < 0.05)compared with OPCAB group patients, and the incidence of cardiovascular events and angina within 30 postoperative days were similar between the 2 subgroups. ConclusionsPostoperative mortality and number of distal anastomosis are not significantly different between CABG and OPCAB patients, but OPCAB can significantly reduce operation time, thoracic drainage, blood transfusion, length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation time compared with CABG. For high-risk patients with high EuroSCORE, OPCAB can better reduce the incidence of postoperative stroke compared with CABG.
Ischemic mitral regurgitation represents a common complication after myocardial infarction, the severity of the mitral regurgitation increases the risk of mortality. There is continuing debate regarding the management of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing surgical management. The debates lie in whether adding mitral valve surgery to coronary artery bypass grafting. So the review is about the analysis of existing evidence and expectation about it.
Objective To explore perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） using the radialartery as the second arterial graft. Methods Clinical data of 175 consecutive patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting （OPCAB） in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command from August 2011 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All the 175 patients were divided into two groups. There were 75 patients including 49 male and 26 female patients with their age of 56.8±8.2 years in group 1，who received radial artery as a graft vessel. There were 100patients including 66 male and 34 female patients with their age of 57.7±8.1 years in group 2，who received great saphenousvein but not radial artery as the graft vessel. The use of left internal mammary artery as a graft vessel was 100% in both groups. Perioperative cardiovascular events and other clinical results were compared between the two groups. Results All the patients survived OPCAB and there was no 30-day death. There was no statistical difference in operation time，thoracic drainage within the first 24 hours after surgery or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups（P＞0.05）. Length of postoperative ICU stay and mechanical ventilation time of group 1 were shorter than those of group 2，although the differencewas not statistically significant. The percentage of patients receiving prolonged postoperative inotropic therapy of group 2 was higher than that of group 1 ［16% （16/100） vs. 12% （9/75）］，although the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperatively，there was no patient in group 1 who had new-onset myocardial ischemia or received intra-aortic balloon pump （IABP） support for hemodynamic instability. In group 2，3 patients had new-onset myocardial ischemia and 2 patientsreceived IABP support after OPCAB. Conclusion Radial artery can partly replace great saphenous vein as a graft vesselfor OPCAB，which does not increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events but is beneficial for postoperativerecovery to some degree. Radial artery can be more extensively used in CABG.