• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Author
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Author "ZHU Weiwei" 1 results
        • Comparison of Various Venae Profundae Catheterization

          目的:比較不同部位、不同方式深靜脈置管的優缺點。方法:根據患者病情及能否配合操作,分別采用鎖骨下靜脈穿刺置管術、頸內靜脈穿刺置管術、股靜脈穿刺置管術并將三種術式的優缺點及所致的并發癥進行比較。結果:276例深靜脈置管術中(1) 經鎖骨下置管者220例,占79.71%。其中術后感染2例,占0.91%;誤入動脈2例,占0.91%;縱膈血腫1例,占0.45%;(2) 經頸內靜脈置管者35例,占12.68%。其中術后感染3例,占1.40%;誤入動脈者1例,占2.86%;氣胸1例,占2.86%;術后導管脫落者1例,占2.86%;(3) 經股靜脈置管者21例,占7.60%。其中術后感染5例,占23.8%;誤入動脈者1例,占4.76%。結論:幾種深靜脈穿刺術中,尤以經鎖骨下穿刺者并發癥相對較少,是深靜脈置管方式中的首選。

          Release date:2016-09-08 10:01 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜