ObjectiveTo explore the associations between estrogen receptor α (ESR1) gene intron 1 PvuⅡ (?397 T/C, rs2334693), XbaⅠ (?351 A/G, rs9340799) polymorphisms and premature ovarian failure (POF).MethodsLiterature published before February 2021 were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and CQVIP databases, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed before. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for data analysis, the Q test and I2 statistic were used for heterogeneity analysis. Random-effect model or fixed-effect model was used according to I2 value. All analyses were performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSix case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. For the associations between ESR1 gene intron 1 PvuⅡ polymorphisms and POF, there was no statistical difference in TT vs. CC model [OR=0.72, 95%CI (0.31, 1.70), P=0.46], TC vs. CC model [OR=1.09, 95%CI (0.83, 1.43), P=0.54], recessive model [OR=1.08, 95%CI (0.68, 1.70), P=0.74], or dominant model [OR=0.77, 95%CI (0.42, 1.42), P=0.41]. For the associations between ESR1 gene intron 1 XbaⅠ polymorphisms and POF, there was no statistical difference in AA vs. GG model [OR=0.88, 95%CI (0.44, 1.75), P=0.72], AG vs. GG model [OR=1.23, 95%CI (0.84, 1.79), P=0.29], recessive model [OR=1.14, 95%CI (0.81, 1.61), P=0.44], or dominant model [OR=0.75, 95%CI (0.41, 1.35), P=0.34], either. No statistical difference was found in the ethno-based subgroup analyses (P>0.05). Most models had obvious heterogeneities.ConclusionsCurrent evidence can’t confirm the associations between ESR1 gene PvuⅡ, XbaⅠ polymorphisms and POF. High-quality, multi-central and large-sample studies are still necessary to support this conclusion.