ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and the correlation of clinical factors between SUVmax values and PD-L1.MethodsThe clinical data of 84 patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed pathologically in West China Hospital, Sichuan University from August 2016 to November 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, including 38 males and 46 females, aged 60 (32-85) years. The tumor was acinar-predominant in 37 patients, papillary in 20, lepidic in 19, solid in 5 and micropapillary in 3. Multivariate analysis of the relationship between SUVmax value and other clinicopathological features was performed by linear regression. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between PD-L1 protein expression and other pathological features.ResultsThe SUVmax of the PD-L1 expression group was significantly higher than that of the non-PD-L1 expression group in the whole invasive lung adenocarcinoma group (P=0.002) and intermediate-grade histologic subtype (P=0.016). The SUVmax cut-off value of PD-L1 expression in the whole invasive lung adenocarcinoma group and intermediate-grade histologic subtype was 5.34 (AUC: 0.732, P=0.002) and 5.34 (AUC: 0.720, P=0.017), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that pleura involvement, vascular tumor thrombus and the increase of tumor diameter could cause the increase of the SUVmax value, while the SUVmax value decreased in the moderately differentiated tumor compared with the poorly differentiated tumor. The SUVmax cut-off value between low-grade histologic subtype and intermediate-grade histologic subtype, intermediate-grade histologic subtype and high-grade histologic subtypes was 1.54 (AUC: 0.854, P<0.001) and 5.79 (AUC: 0.889, P<0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis of PD-L1 expression showed pleura involvement (P=0.021, OR=0.022, 95%CI 0.001 to 0.558) and moderate differentiation (opposite to poor differentiation) (P=0.004, OR=0.053, 95%CI 0.007 to 0.042) decreased the expression of PD-L1.ConclusionThe SUVmax of the PD-L1 expression group is significantly higher than that of the non-PD-L1 expression group in the whole invasive lung adenocarcinoma group and intermediate-grade histologic subtype. The level of SUVmax and the expression of PD-L1 in invasive lung adenocarcinoma are related to many clinical factors.
With the accelerating trend of population aging, the number of elderly patients with lung cancer continues to rise, and the disease burden is becoming increasingly heavy. The clinical management of these patients faces severe challenges due to their decreased physiological reserve, complex comorbidities, and significant individual heterogeneity. Consequently, under traditional diagnosis and treatment models, doctors often struggle to identify the individualized risks of elderly patients in a timely and comprehensive manner, which can easily lead to decision biases such as undertreatment or overtreatment. In view of this, this study advocates for the establishment of an umbrella decision-making model specifically tailored for elderly lung cancer patients. Grounded in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) platform, this model deeply integrates oncological indicators with the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) system. By holistically considering multidimensional variables including tumor burden, organ function, frailty index, cognitive status, and social support, the model establishes an operational mechanism characterized by "single entry, precise stratification, and targeted selection". Accordingly, patients can be scientifically triaged into distinct intervention tiers, such as active surveillance, minimally invasive surgery, drug therapy, radiotherapy, and best supportive care, thereby achieving real-time alignment between treatment intensity and patient fitness. This article elaborates on the construction logic and key operational procedures of this novel decision-making framework, aiming to guide clinical practice beyond the limitations of a tumor-centric perspective toward a holistic, dynamic, whole-course management strategy. This transition seeks to ensure optimal quality of life and clinical net benefit for elderly patients alongside survival prolongation.