ObjectiveTo systematically review the influence on ovarian reserve function by different hemostatic methods during laparoscopic cystectomy in treatment of ovarian endometrioma (OE). MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were electronically searched, to collect relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about laparoscopic electro coagulation vs. microscopically suture for OE from 1990 to Mar, 2014. Meanwhile, references of included studies were also retrieved manually. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then RevMan 5.2 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 236 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the luteinizing hormone (LH) levels after 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months and estradiol (E2) levels after 2 months, 6 months had no significant differences between the two groups and the E2 level after 12 month of the suture group was significantly lower than that of the electro coagulation group. The levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), LH, E2, antral follicle count (AFC), mean ovarian stromal peak systolic blood flow velocity (PSV) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in the suture group were significantly superior to those in the electro coagulation group at other follow-up time. ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that in treatment of ovarian endometriotic cyst by laparoscopic cystectomy, compared with electro coagulation hemostasis, suture hemostasis has less influence on ovarian reserve function. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.