Objective To review the recent advances in the application of graphene oxide (GO) for bone tissue engineering. Methods The latest literature at home and abroad on the GO used in the bone regeneration and repair was reviewed, including general properties of GO, degradation performance, biocompatibility, and application in bone tissue engineering. Results GO has an abundance of oxygen-containing functionalities, high surface area, and good biocompatibility. In addition, it can promote stem cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Moreover, GO has many advantages in the construction of new composite scaffolds and improvement of the performance of traditional scaffolds. Conclusion GO has been a hot topic in the field of bone tissue engineering due to its excellent physical and chemical properties. And many problems still need to be solved.
ObjectiveTo summarize the latest research progress of graphene and its derivatives (GDs) in bone repair. MethodsThe relevant research literature at home and abroad in recent years was extensively accessed. The properties of GDs in bone repair materials, including mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, and antibacterial properties, were systematically summarized, and the unique advantages of GDs in material preparation, functionalization, and application, as well as the contributions and challenges to bone tissue engineering, were discussed. ResultsThe application of GDs in bone repair materials has broad prospects, and the functionalization and modification technology effectively improve the osteogenic activity and material properties of GDs. GDs can induce osteogenic differentiation of stem cells through specific signaling pathways and promote osteogenic activity through immunomodulatory mechanisms. In addition, the parameters of GDs have significant effects on the cytotoxicity and degradation behavior.ConclusionGDs has great potential in the field of bone repair because of its excellent physical and chemical properties and biological properties. However, the cytotoxicity, biodegradability, and functionalization strategies of GDs still need to be further studied in order to achieve a wider application in the field of bone tissue engineering.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of graphene oxide (GO)-carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) hydrogel loaded with interleukin 4 (IL-4) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) on macrophages M2 type differentiation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).MethodsGO solution was mixed with CMC, then the phosphate buffered saline (PBS), IL-4, BMP-2, or IL-4+BMP-2 were added to prepare different GO-CMC hydrogel scaffolds with or without different cytokines under crosslinking agents. The characteristics of pure GO-CMC hydrogel were characterized by gross observation, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and the CMC hydrogel was used as control. The sustained release of GO-CMC hydrogels with different cytokines was also tested. Macrophages were isolated and cultured from female Sprague Dawley rats aged 4-5 weeks, and then cultured with GO-CMC hydrogels with and without different cytokines, respectively. CD206 immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the differentiation of macrophages after 24 hours. The 3rd generation of rats BMSCs were cultured with GO-CMC hydrogels with and without different cytokines respectively for osteogenic induction. The early osteogenesis was observed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining after 10 days, and the late osteogenesis was observed by alizarin red staining after 21 days.ResultsGenerally, GO-CMC hydrogel was brown and translucent. SEM showed that the pore diameter and wall thickness of GO-CMC hydrogel were similar to that of CMC hydrogel, but the inner wall roughness increased. FTIR test showed that CMC polymerized to form hydrogel. In vitro, the sustained release experiments showed that the properties of GO-CMC hydrogels loaded with different cytokines were similar. CD206 immunofluorescence detection showed that GO-CMC hydrogels could induce macrophages differentiation into M2-type. ALP and alizarin red staining showed that GO-CMC hydrogels could induce BMSCs osteogenic differentiation, in which GO-CMC hydrogel loaded with IL-4+BMP-2 showed the most significant effect (P<0.05).ConclusionThe GO-CMC hydrogel loaded with IL-4 and BMP-2 can induce macrophages differentiation into M2-type and enhance the ability of BMSCs with osteogenic differentiation in vitro, which provide a new strategy for bone defect repair and immune regulation.
ObjectiveTo review the application and research progress of the electroactivity graphene-based materials (GBMs) in the field of bone defect repair. Methods The recent domestic and international literature was extensively reviewed to systematically summarize the electroactive performance of GBMs in bone repair composite materials. The unique advantages of GBMs in material preparation, multi-functionalization, and application were discussed, along with their contributions and clinical translation challenges in bone tissue engineering. ResultsBone defect repair remains a major global clinical challenge. Utilizing electroactive biomaterials to mimic the endogenous bioelectric microenvironment is a frontier strategy to accelerate bone regeneration. With outstanding electrical conductivity and physicochemical properties, GBMs exhibit great potential in constructing electroactive bone repair materials. The introduction of GBMs into conductive scaffolds or self-powered piezoelectric systems not only builds a continuous conductive network to promote electrical signal transduction and osteogenic differentiation, but also exerts broad-spectrum antibacterial effects via physical cutting and induced oxidative stress. Furthermore, GBMs promote the M2 polarization of macrophages, achieving a multi-effect synergy of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions within a single material system. Extensive animal experiments have verified that GBMs can significantly accelerate new bone formation and interfacial integration in complex or even infected microenvironments. Moreover, the biocompatibility and degradation performance of GBMs are highly dependent on their concentration, size, and oxidation degree. The cytotoxicity induced by high concentrations, the batch-to-batch heterogeneity of materials, and the long-term retention of large-sized residues in vivo remain the primary challenges at present. Conclusion Electroactivity GBMs materials provide an innovative, efficient, and multifunctional synergistic solution for bone repair. Future research should focus on the standardization of electrical stimulation parameters, overcoming the physicochemical heterogeneity of the materials, and systematically evaluating their long-term in vivo biosafety and degradation kinetics to accelerate their clinical translation.