• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "Fluid-based cytology test" 1 results
        • The Value of Cervical Fluid-based Cytology Test, High-risk Human Papillomavirus Test, and Colposcopy in Screening Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer in High-risk Populations

          ObjectiveTo investigate the screening value of cervical fluid-based cytology test (TCT), high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test, and colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer in high-risk populations. MethodsA total of 466 patients between January 2013 and January 2015 with a history of intercourse bleeding were enrolled in this study, and the screening value of TCT, HR-HPV test and colposcopy for CIN and cervical cancer were retrospectively evaluated. ResultsIn the 466 patients, 165 were diagnosed with cervical inflammation, 116 with CIN, 182 with grade 2-3 CIN, and 3 with cervical cancer. The colposcopy had the highest sensitivity (84.1%), the lowest specificity (59.4%), high false positive rate (40.6%), low false negative rate (15.9%), and the highest negative predictive value (67.1%). The TCT had the highest specificity (84.8%) and the lowest false positive rate (15.2%). The indicators of HR-HPV were between those of TCT and colposcopy. There were significant differences in terms of these indicators among the three methods (P < 0.05). And the positive prediction value of HR-HPV was the highest (84.5%), while the negative prediction value of colposcopy was the highest (67.1%). There was a significant difference in the predictive value among the three methods (P < 0.05). The consistency of either TCT or HR-HPV alone with pathological diagnosis was poor (K=0.213, 0.343), while that of colposcopy was moderate (K=0.446). Combination of TCT and HR-HPV could significantly improve the diagnosis sensitivity (93.0%) with a lower false negative rate (7.0%); Youden index was 0.736, and the consistency with pathological examination was high (K=0.748). ConclusionsFor high-risk population with a history of intercourse bleeding or other abnormal cervical disorders, the screening sensitivity of TCT and HR-HPV alone for CIN and cervical cancer is low with a high false negative rate. Colposcopy has a high sensitivity and a low specificity. By combination of TCT and HR-HPV, the validity, reliability and predictive values can be improved significantly, and the sensitivity is high with a low false negative rate and a high consistency with pathological examination.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜