Objective To observe the effect of emergent vitrectomy combined with lensectomy, silicone oil temponade for endogenous endophthalmitis. Methods The clinical data of 28 patients (30 eyes) with endogenous endophthalmitis were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had no history of ocular trauma and intraocular surgery history. There were 21 patients without systemic symptoms, three patients with fever, two patients with eye pain and headache, and two patients with abdominal pain when presentation. All patients diagnosed by best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp microscopy, direct and indirect ophthalmoscope examination and intraocular B-ultrasound examination. Emergent surgery (vitrectomy, lensectomy, silicone oil temponade) was performed in all 30 patients, those with fever or abdominal pain was also treated by relevant clinical departments. Vitreous purulence was taken in all patients before vitrectomy for bacterial, fungal culture and drug sensitivity test. The follow-up was 18 to 30 months. The preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure and eye retention situation were observed.Results Endophthalmitis was controlled in 28/30 eyes (93.3%) after surgery, recurrent vitreous empyema occurred in 2/30 eyes (6.7%). Evisceration was performed on those two eyes as uncontrolled intraocular pressure. The visual acuity improved significantly at one month and 18 months after surgery (chi;2=19.87, 32.44; P＜0.01). Postoperative intraocular pressure was normal in 24 eyes (80.0%), transient elevated and controlled in six eyes (chi;2=7.43；P＜0.05). 12/28 (42.9%) vitreous samples were positive for pathogen culture, including 7/12 (58.3%) positive for bacteria, 5/12 (41.7%) positive for fungi. There are 18/28 patients (64.3%) also had hepatobiliary system infections. Conclusion Emergent vitrectomy combined with lensectomy, silicone oil temponade is effective for endogenous endophthalmitis.
Objective To evaluate glaucoma and anterior chamber angle changes after intravitreal silicone oil injection(SOI). Methods The intraocular pressure(IOP) and anterior chamber angles of 34 e yes(33 patients)undergone pars plana vitrectomy and SOI were observed. Results Glaucoma occurred in 9 eyes(26%),in which silicone oil glaucoma(SOG) accounted for 77%(7/9).The changes of the superior part of anterior chamber angle were peripheral anterior synechiae in 11 eye(32%) and SO emulsification droplets in 22 eyes(64%) in 1～4.5 months after surgeries.Glaucoma occurred in 6 eyes of 7 eyes undergone peripheral iridectomy at the inferio r part of the iris after the closure of iridectomy holes (plt;0.05). Conclusion High incidence of glaucoma was found in this series of patients after intravitreal silicone oil injection,and the main causes of SOG were closure of the inferior iridecomy hole and silicone emulsification. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2001,17:105-107)
Objective To evaluate the relative factors of effect of vitrectomy on corneal endothelial cells. Methods Retrospective analysis of the results of corneal endothelium microscopy performed on 213 eyes of 213 patients undergone vetrectomy operations including single vitrectomy (78 eyes), vitrectomy combined with cataract extraction (135 eyes), silicone oil injection (34 eyes), and C3F8 injection (53 eyes) before and after 1 week, 1 and 3 moths of these surgical procedures. Results There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative corneal endothelium density in single vitrectomy group and vitrectomy combined with cataract extraction with posterior capsule integrity group (Pgt;0.05). The corneal endothelium density significantly decreased postoperatively in C3F8or silicone oil injection group with broken posterior capsule (Plt;0.05). Conclusion C3F8 and silicone oil may damnify corneal endothelium in patients undergo vitrectom y combined with cataract extraction with broken posterior capsule. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2004，20：101-103)
ObjectiveTo investigate and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a modified anterior approach for transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. MethodsA retrospective case-control study. A total of 148 patients (148 eyes) who underwent silicone oil removal combined with cataract surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2020 and November 2024 were included in the study. All affected eyes underwent preoperative examinations including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, corneal topography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Based on the method of silicone oil removal, the eyes were divided into two groups: group A (modified anterior approach transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation, 99 eyes) and group B (standard pars plana vitrectomy for silicone oil removal combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation, 49 eyes). The surgical duration, changes in BCVA and intraocular pressure at 1 day, 7 days, and 1 month postoperatively, as well as the incidence of complications such as corneal edema and its resolution, conjunctival congestion, iris prolapse, posterior capsule rupture, nucleus drop, IOL position, residual silicone oil in the vitreous cavity or anterior chamber, vitreous hemorrhage, recurrent retinal detachment (RD), and choroidal detachment or hemorrhage, were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t-test was used for the comparison of measurement data between the two groups, and the χ2 test was used for the comparison of count data. Results The operation time of group A and group B was (17.01±1.28) min and (31.62±2.32) min, respectively. The operation time of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (t=?41.002, P＜0.001). The comparison of BCVA (t =?0.561, ?0.833, ?1.386) and IOP (t =?0.055, 1.375, ?0.507) between the two groups of affected eyes before surgery and at 1 day and 7 days after surgery showed no statistically significant differences (P＞0.05). There was no silicone oil residual in group A, while 3 eyes in group B were observed with silicone oil residual (6.1%, 3/49). Neovascular glaucoma was observed in one eye. Compared to group A, group B exhibited a statistically significant increase in the incidence of postoperative conjunctival congestion, silicone oil retention, and posterior capsular opacification (χ2=10.600, 6.187, 92.617; P＜0.05). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of corneal edema or recurrent retinal detachment (RD) (χ2=0.272, 1.557; P＞0.05). No intraoperative complications, such as iris prolapse, posterior capsular rupture, nucleus drop, zonular dehiscence, choroidal detachment, or hemorrhage, occurred in any of the operated eyes. Furthermore, no postoperative complications, including corneal endothelial decompensation, IOL displacement, or endophthalmitis, were observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionCompared to the conventional pars plana approach for silicone oil removal combined with cataract surgery, the modified anterior perfusion transpupillary approach demonstrated significantly shorter surgical duration and a reduced incidence of postoperative complications.
Objective To investigate the causes of visual loss and failure of treatment after intraocular silicone oil removal. Methods Retrospective clinical analysis of the causes of loss of visual acuity of 15 eyes after silicone oil removal in patients with complicated retinal detachment which were successfully treated with vitreous and retinal microsurgery. Results Among the 15 eyes,retina failed to reattach in 11 eyes,secondary glaucoma occurred in 2 eyes and corneal opacity appeared in another two eyes.All of them were resulted in total loss of vision. Conclusion Retinal redetachment was the leading cause of final visual loss in the failing 15 cases(15 eyes) after intraocular silicone oil removal,and secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation may also be the causes of visual loss. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 1999, 15: 230-231)