Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment with Fuzheng Huayu capsule for liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials (CCTR), CBMweb and CNKI up to March 2008. The references of retrieved literature were also hand searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared Fuzheng Huayu capsule with placebo or other drugs were collected. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’ s software RevMan 4.2.10 was used for data analyses. Results Seven RCTs involving 590 cases of liver fibrosis of CHB were included. As for their methodological quality, one was graded A, one was graded B and the others were graded C. We carried out subgroup analyses based on treatment course and intervention measures. In terms of reducing haluronic acid, Fuzheng Huayu capsule was more effective than Huoluo Shugan capsule when the treatment course was 3 months (WMD=–61.75, 95%CI –105.20 to –18.30); significant differences were also noted between Fuzheng Huayu capsule and placebo (WMD=–187.72, 95%CI –244.23 to –31.21) or Huoluo Shugan capsule (WMD=–120.03, 95%CI –158.41 to –81.65) when the treatment course was 6 months. In terms of reducing IV-C, Fuzheng Huayu capsule was more effective than Gantaile when the treatment course was 6 months (WMD=–72.32, 95%CI –84.30 to –60.34). As for improving liver fibrosis at stage S, significant differences were observed between Fuzheng Huayu capsule and Gantaile (RR=2.33, 95%CI 1.37 to 3.96) or Huoluo Shugan capsule (RR=1.30, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.65). Except a very small number of gastrointestinal reactions, no significant adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion Fuzheng Huayu capsule is effective in reducing haluronic acid and improving liver fibrosis at stage S, especially when the treatment course is prolonged from 3 months to 6 months. No significant adverse reactions are reported. Because most of the included trials are of poor quality and small sample size, more high-quality RCTs are needed.
【摘要】 目的 評價簡化腎臟病膳食改良試驗（MDRDa）方程以及國內兩個改良MDRD方程（中國方程1、2）預測中國慢性腎臟病患者腎小球濾過率（glomerular filtration rate，GFR）的適用性。 方法 選擇2008年1-12月住院慢性腎病患者250例，用99mTc-DTPA腎動態顯像法測定GFR（sGFR），同時測定血清肌酐、尿素氮，根據年齡和性別分別用簡化MDRD方程、中國方程1和中國方程2預測GFR，即eGFRa （簡化MDRD方程）、eGFR1 （中國方程1）和eGFR2（中國方程2），以sGFR為參考值，將估計的eGFRs進行比較。 結果 各方程eGFRs與sGFR之間呈顯著相關關系。其中中國方程2的估算eGFR2與sGFR具有良好的一致性，總體偏差最小，準確性最高。 結論 中國方程2優于簡化MDRD方程和中國方程1，可用于中國慢性腎病人群eGFR的計算。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the applicability of three equations for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods A total of 250 patients with CKD which were diagnosed according to K/DAQI guidelines between January and December 2008 were selected. GFR were estimated with Chinese equation 1 (eGFR1), Chinese equation 2 (eGFR2) and abbreviated MDRD (eGFRa) separately, and the results were compared with that of 99mTc-DTPA(sGFR). Results The eGFRs of the three equations were correlated significantly with sGFR. Chinese equation 2 seemed to be the best; eGFR2 showed less bias and higher accuracy than other equations. Conclusion Chinese equation 2 for estimation of GFR may be more accurate in Chinese CKD patients.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with hepatitis C after kidney transplantation with combination of interferon-α and ribavirin. Methods Based on an adequate assessment of the patient’ s condition and using the principle of PICO, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), PubMed (1995 to March 2009), and CHKD (1995 to 2008.12). Results Eighteen studies were identified including 17 in English (5 case reports, 11 cohort studies, and 1 meta–analysis) and 1 in Chinese. According to the current evidence as well as the patient’ s clinical condition and preference, PEG-IFNα-2b 50 μg /week plus ribavirin 600 mg/day was given to the patient for 6 months. Conclusion Evidence-based approaches help us to prepare the anti-viral therapy plan and will improve the assessment of the efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation.
Objective?To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Gansu for chronic hepatitis B. Methods?We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases up to Dce. 2009. The methodological quality assessment and data extraction of the included studies were conducted by two reviewers independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results?A total of 14 studies involving 1 755 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of which, 12 studies did not report randomization method, and the other two studies reported inadequate methods of randomization. None of the studies enforced allocation concealment and performed blinding. We conducted subgroup analyses based on the outcome measures and interventions. The results of meta-analyses showed: (1) In terms of reducing ALT, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone. (2) In terms of the HBsAg seroconversion rate, no significant difference was found between the two groups. (3) In terms of the HBeAg, no significant difference was found between the two groups at 3 months’ follow-up. (4) In terms of the HBV-DNA, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone at 3 and 6 months’ follow-up, but theses differences were not found between Gansu + Lamivudine/ Adefovir and Lamivudine/ Adefovir alone. In terms of reducing the index of hepatic fibrosis, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone. Conclusion?Gansu might be effective in normalizing ALT levels, clearing HBV DNA, achieving virus seroconversion and improving hepatic fibrosis, without any serious adverse effects. However, because the overall effects cannot be pooled for analysis, more evidence is needed to support this finding.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in treating viral hepatitis.Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from 1978 to June 2007. We identified randomized control led trials of Kai Shi injection versus other medicines or blank controlin treating viral hepatitis. The quality of included trials was evaluated independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Fourteen studies involving 1 218 patients were included, one of these compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus Mai Anding injection, one compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, and the other 12 compared Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus blank control. Allincluded studies were assessed in terms of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding; and all were graded C(poor quality). Meta-analyses showed that, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR 1.45, 95%CI (1.29, 1.63)] and the mortality was lower[RR 0.66, 95%CI (0.53, 0.83)] compared with the blank control group, but the incidence of phlebitis was significantlyhigher [RR 7.70, 95%CI (2.57, 23.07)]. There was no significant di f ference between Mai Anding inject ion and lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in the total effective rate, but Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection was more effective in improving patients’ liver functions. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR1.54, 95%CI (1.14, 2.08)].Conclusion The evidence currently available shows that the effectiveness and safety of lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection are not significantly different from those of Mai Anding injection for patients with viral hepatitis. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection could significantly improve the total effective rate, but since we only include 1 relevant randomized trials, the strength of this evidence is weak. When compared with the blank control, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection significantly improved the total effective rate, decreased mortality but increased the incidence of side effects and the existing evidence is insufficiant to show whether Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection improves patients’ liver functions.