系統評價/Meta分析方法學質量的評價工具AMSTAR_《中國循證醫學雜志》

作者：

熊俊 ^1,2 ,  陳日新 ¹

1. 江西中醫學院附屬醫院（南昌?330006）；2. 廣州中醫藥大學（廣州?510405）;

關鍵詞：

循證醫學系統評價 Meta分析方法學質量評價 AMSTAR

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20110180

視頻：

導出 下載 收藏 掃碼 引用

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

AMSTAR是國外最新研發的用于評價系統評價/Meta分析方法學質量的測量工具，具有良好的效度、信度和反應度，得到了較為廣泛的運用。本文就AMSTAR的研發過程、評價條目、運用現狀等問題逐一介紹給國內研究者和使用者。

引用本文： 熊俊,陳日新. 系統評價/Meta分析方法學質量的評價工具AMSTAR. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2011, 11(9): 1084-1089. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20110180 復制

1.	6 Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al . Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr , 2002, 2(2): 1-3.
2.	7 Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al . Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ , 2000, 321(7256): 537-540.
3.	8 Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
4.	10 Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ , 1994, 309(6955): 648-651.
5.	11 Sacks H, Berrier J, Reitman D, et al . Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med , 1987, 316(8): 450-455.
6.	12 Moher D. Cook DJ. Eastwood S, et al . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet , 1999; 354(9193): 1896-1900.
7.	14 Sterne JAC, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 2000, 53(11): 1119-1129.
8.	15 Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al . Development of AMSTAR: A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2007, 7(10): 1-10. e7-8.
9.	17 Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, et al . Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet , 1997, 351(9095): 326-329.
10.	18 Moher D, Pham B, Klassen T, et al . What contributions do languages other than English make to the results of meta-analyses? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 2000, 53(9): 964-972.
11.	19 Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al . External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS ONE , 2007, 2(12): 1-4. e1350.
12.	22 Singh JA, Christensen R, Wells GA, et al . Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007848.
13.	23 Miktona C, Butchart A. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ , 2009, 87(5): 353-361.
14.	24 Panesar SS, Rao C, Joshua A. et al . Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome. Can J Surg , 2009, 52(5): 137-142.
15.	25 Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Management of Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Children With Congenital Hemiplegia. Pediatrics , 2009, 123(4): 1111-1122.
16.	26 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, et al . Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research , 2009, 18(3): 313-333.
17.	27 Bessa-Nogueira RV, Vasconcelos CE, Niederman R. The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and non-surgical treatment. BMC Oral Health , 2008, 8(10): 27.
18.	28 Cornell JE, Laine C. The Science and Art of Deduction: Complex Systematic Overviews. Ann Intern Med , 2008, 148(10): 786-782.
19.	30 Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, et al . Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med , 2007, 4(3): 78.
20.	李靜, 李幼平. 不斷完善與發展的Cochrane系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2008, 8(9): 742-743.
21.	Porta M. Chief editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008: 217.
22.	蔡羽嘉, 陳耀龍, 王夢書, 等. 循證醫學術語介紹-VI . 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(9): 942-945.
23.	劉建平, 主編. 循證中醫藥研究方法. 第1版. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2009: 298-299.
24.	劉建平, 夏蕓. 中文期刊發表的中醫藥系統綜述或Meta分析文章的質量評價. 中國中西醫結合雜志2007, 21(4): 306-310.
25.	Shea B, Dubé C, Moher D. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ books, 2001: 122-139.
26.	張俊華, 商洪才, 張伯禮. 系統評價和Meta分析質量的評價方法. 中西醫結合學報, 2008, 6(4): 337-339.
27.	The Cochrane Library. Volume 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley &Sons Ltd; 2004.
28.	Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Available at: http://www.cadth.ca.
29.	Becker LA, Oxman AD. Chapter 22: Overviews of reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available at: www.cochranehandbook.org.
30.	HTA final report: Electrical Nerve Stimlation for Treatment of Pain. Octo.7, 2009. Available at: http: //www.hta.hca.wa.gov.
31.	Moher D, Liberat A, Tetzlaff J, 等. 系統綜述和薈萃分析優先報告的條目: PRISMA聲明. 中西醫結合學報, 2009, 7(9): 889-896.

1. 6 Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al . Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr , 2002, 2(2): 1-3.
2. 7 Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al . Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ , 2000, 321(7256): 537-540.
3. 8 Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
4. 10 Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ , 1994, 309(6955): 648-651.
5. 11 Sacks H, Berrier J, Reitman D, et al . Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med , 1987, 316(8): 450-455.
6. 12 Moher D. Cook DJ. Eastwood S, et al . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet , 1999; 354(9193): 1896-1900.
7. 14 Sterne JAC, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 2000, 53(11): 1119-1129.
8. 15 Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al . Development of AMSTAR: A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2007, 7(10): 1-10. e7-8.
9. 17 Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, et al . Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet , 1997, 351(9095): 326-329.
10. 18 Moher D, Pham B, Klassen T, et al . What contributions do languages other than English make to the results of meta-analyses? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 2000, 53(9): 964-972.
11. 19 Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al . External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS ONE , 2007, 2(12): 1-4. e1350.
12. 22 Singh JA, Christensen R, Wells GA, et al . Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007848.
13. 23 Miktona C, Butchart A. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ , 2009, 87(5): 353-361.
14. 24 Panesar SS, Rao C, Joshua A. et al . Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome. Can J Surg , 2009, 52(5): 137-142.
15. 25 Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Management of Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Children With Congenital Hemiplegia. Pediatrics , 2009, 123(4): 1111-1122.
16. 26 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, et al . Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research , 2009, 18(3): 313-333.
17. 27 Bessa-Nogueira RV, Vasconcelos CE, Niederman R. The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and non-surgical treatment. BMC Oral Health , 2008, 8(10): 27.
18. 28 Cornell JE, Laine C. The Science and Art of Deduction: Complex Systematic Overviews. Ann Intern Med , 2008, 148(10): 786-782.
19. 30 Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, et al . Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med , 2007, 4(3): 78.
20. 李靜, 李幼平. 不斷完善與發展的Cochrane系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2008, 8(9): 742-743.
21. Porta M. Chief editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008: 217.
22. 蔡羽嘉, 陳耀龍, 王夢書, 等. 循證醫學術語介紹-VI . 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(9): 942-945.
23. 劉建平, 主編. 循證中醫藥研究方法. 第1版. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2009: 298-299.
24. 劉建平, 夏蕓. 中文期刊發表的中醫藥系統綜述或Meta分析文章的質量評價. 中國中西醫結合雜志2007, 21(4): 306-310.
25. Shea B, Dubé C, Moher D. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ books, 2001: 122-139.
26. 張俊華, 商洪才, 張伯禮. 系統評價和Meta分析質量的評價方法. 中西醫結合學報, 2008, 6(4): 337-339.
27. The Cochrane Library. Volume 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley &Sons Ltd; 2004.
28. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Available at: http://www.cadth.ca.
29. Becker LA, Oxman AD. Chapter 22: Overviews of reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available at: www.cochranehandbook.org.
30. HTA final report: Electrical Nerve Stimlation for Treatment of Pain. Octo.7, 2009. Available at: http: //www.hta.hca.wa.gov.
31. Moher D, Liberat A, Tetzlaff J, 等. 系統綜述和薈萃分析優先報告的條目: PRISMA聲明. 中西醫結合學報, 2009, 7(9): 889-896.

《中國循證醫學雜志》

系統評價/Meta分析方法學質量的評價工具AMSTAR

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

上一篇

下一篇

Format

Content

《中國循證醫學雜志》

系統評價/Meta分析方法學質量的評價工具AMSTAR

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

上一篇

下一篇

Format

Content

摘要全文圖表視頻參考文獻施引文獻補充材料