| 1. |
Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst, In Press.
|
| 2. |
Culyer AJ, Lomas J. Deliberative process and evidence-informed decisions-making in health care: Do they work and how might we know? Evidence & Policy, 2006, 12: 357-371.
|
| 3. |
Lomas J, Culver T, McCutcheon C, et al. Conceptualizing and Combining evidence for health system guidance. Ottawa, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2005.
|
| 4. |
Lavis JN. Moving forward on both systematic reviews and deliberative processes. Healthcare Policy, 2006, 1: 59-63.
|
| 5. |
Lomas J Decision support: A new approach to making the best healthcare management and policy choices. Healthcare Quarterly, 2007, 10: 16-18.
|
| 6. |
Hanney SR, Gonzalez Block MA, Buxton MJ, et al. The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples, and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2003, 1.
|
| 7. |
Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, et al. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet, 2004, 364: 1615-1621.
|
| 8. |
Gregory J, Hartz-Karp J, Watson R. Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2008, 5.
|
| 9. |
Schunemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2006, 4.
|
| 10. |
Lavis JN, Hammill A, Gildiner A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Factors that Influence the Use of Research Evidence by Public Policymakers. Final Report Submitted to the Canadian Population Health Initiative. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making, 2005.
|
| 11. |
Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform healthcare management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 35-48.
|
| 12. |
Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, et al. Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 2003, 57: 239-251.
|
| 13. |
Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, et al. Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: Results from a Canadian comparative study. Social Science & Medicine, 2007, 64: 2115-2128.
|
| 14. |
Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, et al. Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1999, 4: 236-248.
|
| 15. |
Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2006, 4.
|
| 16. |
Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2006, 4.
|
| 17. |
Schunemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst, 2006, 4: 13.
|
| 18. |
Lavis JN, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK, et al. International Dialogue on Evidence-Informed Action. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making, 2007.
|
| 19. |
Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence- informed health Policymaking (STP). 13. Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, In Press.
|
