知證衛生決策工具之十三——準備和使用政策簡報支持知證決策*_《中國循證醫學雜志》

作者：

John N Lavis ¹ , Govin Permanand ² , Andrew D Oxman ³ , Simon Lewin ⁴ , Atle Fretheim ⁵

關鍵詞：

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20100438

視頻：

導出 下載 收藏 掃碼 引用

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

政策簡報是一個相對較新的為決策者打包研究證據的方法。政策簡報的第一步就是設定政策問題的優先順序，然后收集與問題各種特征相關的各方面研究證據。利用可得到的系統評價可使收集證據的過程可行且合理；若無系統評價，可查找單個相關研究并根據需考慮問題的特征合并單個研究。本文提供以下問題供準備和使用政策簡報支持知證決策者參考：① 該政策簡報是否解決一個高度優先問題，并描述了該問題的相關背景？②該政策簡報是否描述了用于解決該問題各方案的問題、成本和效果及實施時需考慮的關鍵問題？③ 該政策簡報是否用系統、透明的方法查找、篩選及評價合成的研究證據？④ 在討論合成的研究證據時，該政策簡報是否考慮了證據的質量、當地適用性及公平性？⑤ 該政策簡報是否使用分級進入格式？⑥ 是否對該政策簡報的科學質量和系統相關性進行了評價？

引用本文： John N Lavis,Govin Permanand,Andrew D Oxman,Simon Lewin,Atle Fretheim. 知證衛生決策工具之十三——準備和使用政策簡報支持知證決策*. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2010, 10(5): 507-513. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100438 復制

1.	Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): I1.
2.	Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman A, et al. Evidence Summaries Tailored for Health Policy Makers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2009.
3.	Colby DC, Quinn BC, Williams CH, et al. Research glut and information famine: making research evidence more useful for policymakers. Health Aff (Millwood), 2008, 27: 1177-1182.
4.	Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform healthcare management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 35-48.
5.	Lavis JN, Hammill A, Gildiner A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Factors that Influence the Use of Research Evidence by Public Policymakers. Final Report Submitted to the Canadian Population Health Initiative. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making. 2005.
6.	Lavis JN, Davies HT, Gruen RL, et al. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthc Policy, 2006, 1: 21-33.
7.	Lavis JN, Boyko J, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 14. Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S14.
8.	Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J, et al. Towards Optimally Packaged and Relevance Assessed Health Technology Assessments: Report Submitted to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Therapeutics in Healthcare. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making. 2007.
9.	The Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF): Communication Notes: Reader-Friendly Writing - 1?3?25. Ottawa, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. 2009.
10.	Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, et al. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med, 1990, 113: 69-76.
11.	Hartley J. Current findings from research on structured abstracts. J Med Libr Assoc, 2004, 92: 368-371.
12.	Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 3. Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S3.
13.	Lavis JN. Political elites and their influence on health care reform in Canada. In The Governance of Health Care in Canada. Edited by McIntoch T, Forest P-G, Marchildon GP. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated; 2004: 257-79.
14.	Lavis JN, Boyko J. Evidence Brief: Improving Access to Primary Healthcare in Canada. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster Health Forum. 2009.
15.	Lavis JN, Wilson M, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 4. Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Systt, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S4.
16.	Fretheim A, Munabi-Babigumira S, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 6. Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S6.
17.	Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 8. Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S8.
18.	Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 9. Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S9.
19.	Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 10. Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S10.
20.	Oxman AD, Bjorndal A, Flottorp S, et al. Integrated Health Care for People with Chronic Conditions. Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2008.
21.	Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q, 1996, 74: 511-544.

1. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): I1.
2. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman A, et al. Evidence Summaries Tailored for Health Policy Makers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2009.
3. Colby DC, Quinn BC, Williams CH, et al. Research glut and information famine: making research evidence more useful for policymakers. Health Aff (Millwood), 2008, 27: 1177-1182.
4. Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform healthcare management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 35-48.
5. Lavis JN, Hammill A, Gildiner A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Factors that Influence the Use of Research Evidence by Public Policymakers. Final Report Submitted to the Canadian Population Health Initiative. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making. 2005.
6. Lavis JN, Davies HT, Gruen RL, et al. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthc Policy, 2006, 1: 21-33.
7. Lavis JN, Boyko J, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 14. Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S14.
8. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J, et al. Towards Optimally Packaged and Relevance Assessed Health Technology Assessments: Report Submitted to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Therapeutics in Healthcare. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making. 2007.
9. The Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF): Communication Notes: Reader-Friendly Writing - 1?3?25. Ottawa, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. 2009.
10. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, et al. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med, 1990, 113: 69-76.
11. Hartley J. Current findings from research on structured abstracts. J Med Libr Assoc, 2004, 92: 368-371.
12. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 3. Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S3.
13. Lavis JN. Political elites and their influence on health care reform in Canada. In The Governance of Health Care in Canada. Edited by McIntoch T, Forest P-G, Marchildon GP. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated; 2004: 257-79.
14. Lavis JN, Boyko J. Evidence Brief: Improving Access to Primary Healthcare in Canada. Hamilton, Canada, McMaster Health Forum. 2009.
15. Lavis JN, Wilson M, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 4. Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Systt, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S4.
16. Fretheim A, Munabi-Babigumira S, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 6. Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S6.
17. Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 8. Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S8.
18. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 9. Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S9.
19. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 10. Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S10.
20. Oxman AD, Bjorndal A, Flottorp S, et al. Integrated Health Care for People with Chronic Conditions. Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2008.
21. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q, 1996, 74: 511-544.

下一篇
知證衛生決策工具之十四——組織和開展政策對話支持知證決策*

《中國循證醫學雜志》

知證衛生決策工具之十三——準備和使用政策簡報支持知證決策*

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

下一篇

Format

Content

《中國循證醫學雜志》

知證衛生決策工具之十三——準備和使用政策簡報支持知證決策*

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

下一篇

Format

Content

摘要全文圖表視頻參考文獻施引文獻補充材料