意見不一致時的策略：應用GRADE網格對臨床實踐指南達成共識*_《中國循證醫學雜志》

作者：

Roman Jaeschke , Gordon H Guyatt , Phil Dellinger , Holger Schnemann , Mitchell M Levy , Regina Kunz , Susan Norris , Julian Bion

關鍵詞：

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20090128

視頻：

導出 下載 收藏 掃碼 引用

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

引用本文： Roman Jaeschke,Gordon H Guyatt,Phil Dellinger,Holger Schnemann,Mitchell M Levy,Regina Kunz,Susan Norris,Julian Bion. 意見不一致時的策略：應用GRADE網格對臨床實踐指南達成共識*. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 09(7): 730-733. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090128 復制

1.	?1 Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, et al. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 174(5): 605-614.
2.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
3.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336(7651): 995-998.
4.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7652): 1049-1051.
5.	Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.
6.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7654): 1170-1173.
7.	Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy System, 2006, 4: 15.
8.	Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy System, 2006, 4: 17.
9.	Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess, 1998, 2(3): i-iv, 1-88.
10.	Thangaratinam S, Redman CWE. The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2005, 7(2): 120-125.
11.	Vella K, Goldfrad C, Rowan KM, et al. Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. BMJ, 2000, 320(7240): 976-980.
12.	CoBaTrICE Collaboration. Consensus development of an international competency-based training programme in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med, 2006, 32(9): 1371-1383.
13.	Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ, 2005, 331(7517): 631-633.
14.	Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1): 296-327.
15.	Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL. Surviving sepsis—practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(16): 1640-1642.

1. ?1 Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, et al. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 174(5): 605-614.
2. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
3. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336(7651): 995-998.
4. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7652): 1049-1051.
5. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7654): 1170-1173.
7. Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy System, 2006, 4: 15.
8. Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy System, 2006, 4: 17.
9. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess, 1998, 2(3): i-iv, 1-88.
10. Thangaratinam S, Redman CWE. The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2005, 7(2): 120-125.
11. Vella K, Goldfrad C, Rowan KM, et al. Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. BMJ, 2000, 320(7240): 976-980.
12. CoBaTrICE Collaboration. Consensus development of an international competency-based training programme in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med, 2006, 32(9): 1371-1383.
13. Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ, 2005, 331(7517): 631-633.
14. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1): 296-327.
15. Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL. Surviving sepsis—practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(16): 1640-1642.

《中國循證醫學雜志》

意見不一致時的策略：應用GRADE網格對臨床實踐指南達成共識*

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

上一篇

下一篇

Format

Content

《中國循證醫學雜志》

意見不一致時的策略：應用GRADE網格對臨床實踐指南達成共識*

摘要 全文 圖表 視頻 參考文獻 施引文獻 補充材料

上一篇

下一篇

Format

Content

摘要全文圖表視頻參考文獻施引文獻補充材料