5G-enabled remote robot-assisted thoracic surgery: Clinical outcomes, current challenges, and future perspectives_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

CHEN Wenlong ¹ , YANG Jiyong ¹ , LIU Yaling ¹ , ZUO Zhuang ¹ , QUE Changhao ¹ ,  DOU Li ² ,  GOU Yunjiu ^1,2

1. The First Clinical Medical College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China;
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

DOU Li, Email: 550145987@qq.com; GOU Yunjiu, Email: gouyunjiu@163.com

Keywords：

5G; robot-assisted surgery; remote surgery; thoracic surgery; therapeutic efficacy; safety

DOI：

10.7507/1007-4848.202602006

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

With the integration of 5G communication technology and robotic surgical systems, remote robot-assisted thoracic surgery is overcoming geographical barriers, offering an innovative approach to addressing the uneven distribution of medical resources. This study conducted a systematic literature review—using databases such as PubMed and CNKI, with the search period extending up to 2025—incorporating clinical studies, case reports, and review articles to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 5G-enabled remote robot-assisted thoracic surgery (5G-RRATS). The analysis also examined current technological limitations and potential future development trajectories. Existing evidence indicates that, given adequate technical support, 5G-RRATS can achieve perioperative outcomes comparable to those of conventional local robotic surgeries across procedures including pulmonary wedge resection, lobectomy, and esophagectomy. Furthermore, it demonstrates potential advantages in minimizing surgical incisions and reducing intraoperative blood loss. Nevertheless, challenges related to network stability, latency control, interdisciplinary collaboration between medical and engineering teams, and legal, regulatory, and ethical considerations continue to hinder widespread clinical adoption. Looking ahead, the emergence of a "one-to-many" remote surgical model, combined with the integration of artificial intelligence and augmented reality technologies, as well as advancements in low-orbit satellite communications, may enable 5G-RRATS to further advance precision and efficiency in thoracic surgery, thereby facilitating equitable access to high-quality care for a broader patient population.

Citation： CHEN Wenlong, YANG Jiyong, LIU Yaling, ZUO Zhuang, QUE Changhao, DOU Li, GOU Yunjiu. 5G-enabled remote robot-assisted thoracic surgery: Clinical outcomes, current challenges, and future perspectives. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2026, 33(5): 698-709. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.202602006 Copy

1.	Pan HB, Zou NY, Tian Y, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic sub-lobar resection for octogenarians with clinical stage ⅠA non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched real-world study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(3): 1658-1667.
2.	Mirza W, Javid A, Khan ME, et al. Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 65-77.
3.	Coco D, Leanza S. State of the art of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic-style evidence synthesis. J Robot Surg, 2025, 20(1): 108-119.
4.	Du XY, Du YT, Zhang YJ, et al. Urban and rural disparities in general hospital accessibility within a Chinese metropolis. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 23359.
5.	Xia SB, Lu QS. Development status of telesurgery robotic system. Chin J Traumatol, 2021, 24(3): 144-147.
6.	Reddy SK, Saikali S, Gamal A, et al. Telesurgery: a systematic literature review and future directions. Ann Surg, 2025, 282(2): 219-227.
7.	Barba P, Stramiello J, Funk EK, et al. Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(5): 2771-2777.
8.	Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature, 2001, 413(6854): 379-380.
9.	Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg, 2002, 235(4): 487-492.
10.	Georgiou KE, Georgiou E, Satava RM. 5G use in healthcare: the future is present. JSLS, 2021, 25(4): e2021.00064.
11.	Moustris G, Tzafestas C, Konstantinidis K. A long distance telesurgical demonstration on robotic surgery phantoms over 5G. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2023, 18(9): 1577-1587.
12.	Zhang MZ, Hu M, Yang J, et al. A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol, 2025, 23(1): 117.
13.	Tian Y, Lv HB, Jumai A, et al. Ultra-remote robot-assisted right upper lobectomy between the Shanghai and Kashi Prefectures: a case report. J Thorac Dis, 2024, 16(12): 8823-8830.
14.	左莊, 唐旭, 陳文龍, 等. 5G遠程機器人輔助胸腔鏡手術五例. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2025, 32(5): 594-597.Zuo Z, Tang X, Chen WL, et al. Five cases of 5G remote robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2025, 32(5): 594-597.
15.	Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(8): 701-704.
16.	Zhou LP, Zhang XL, Zhang HQ, et al. 5G-enabled remote robotic-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in single thoracolumbar fractures: initial clinical feasibility and safety evaluation. Eur Spine J, 2025, 34(1): 123-130.
17.	Rocco B, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, et al. Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 240-251.
18.	Takano H, Ebihara Y, Hirano S, et al. Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 66-74.
19.	Legeza P, Britz GW, Shah AL, et al. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(1): 29-35.
20.	Dohler M, Saikali S, Gamal A, et al. The crucial role of 5G, 6G, and fiber in robotic telesurgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 19(1): 4-14.
21.	康琳, 張文治, 郝文勝, 等. 基于BFD協議的承載網業務毫秒級保護方案研究及實踐. 郵電設計技術, 2025(6): 65-70.Kang L, Zhang WZ, Hao WS, et al. Research and practice of millisecond-level protection scheme for bearer network services based on BFD protocol. Des Tech Posts Telecommun, 2025(6): 65-70.
22.	Qu Y, Li L, Li T, et al. Smart surgical telementoring system with patch-to-pixel point tracking method. EngMedicine, 2025, 2(1): e25001.
23.	Li Y, Raison N, Ourselin S, et al. AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 403-418.
24.	Xie X, Tian Y, Huang J, et al. Surgery without distance: will 5G-based robot-assisted telesurgery redefine modern surgery?. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2025, 14(5): 1821-1829.
25.	黃韻翰, 周逢海, 郭柏鴻. 基于5G通信技術的遠程機器人手術應用研究進展及關鍵技術分析. 中國微創外科雜志, 2024, 24(2): 138-142.Huang YH, Zhou FH, Guo BH. Research progress and key technology analysis of remote robotic surgery application based on 5G communication technology. Chin J Minim Invasive Surg, 2024, 24(2): 138-142.
26.	Liang H, Liang W, Lei Z, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted endoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical data. World J Surg, 2018, 42(11): 3658-3668.
27.	Saracino A, Oude-Vrielink TJC, Menciassi A, et al. Haptic intracorporeal palpation using a cable-driven parallel robot: a user study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2020, 67(12): 3452-3463.
28.	Trute RJ, Alijani A, Erden MS. Visual cues of soft-tissue behaviour in minimal-invasive and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 401-416.
29.	Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, et al. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 129(1): 151-158.
30.	Hamza H, Aboumarzouk OM, Al-Ansari A, et al. Dynamic augmented reality cues for telementoring in minimally invasive surgeries: scoping review. J Med Internet Res, 2025, 27: e63939.
31.	Sutkin G, Steele C, Brommelsiek M, et al. Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 406-417.
32.	Brian R, Sterponi L, Murillo A, et al. Ambiguity in robotic surgical instruction: lessons from remote and in-person simulation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2025, 30(5): 1387-1401.
33.	苑航, 駱磊, 焦偉, 等. 遠程手術機器人輔助腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術第一助手的配合. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2024, 5(6): 1221-1224.Yuan H, Luo L, Jiao W, et al. Cooperation of the first assistant in remote surgical robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Robotic Surg (Chinese English), 2024, 5(6): 1221-1224.
34.	Nyberg A, Jirwe M, Fagerdahl A, et al. Perioperative patient safety indicators—a Delphi study. J Clin Nurs, 2025, 34(4): 1351-1363.
35.	Li JM, Yang XC, Chu GD, et al. Application of improved robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery with 5G technology in urology. Eur Urol, 2023, 83(1): 41-44.
36.	宋佳純, 蘭彬, 劉帛巖, 等. 5G移動遠程機器人手術1例報告并文獻復習. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 754-758.Song JC, Lan B, Liu BY, et al. A case report of 5G mobile remote robotic surgery and literature review. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 754-758.
37.	代永鴻, 楊匡洋, 曾焰輝, 等. 5G遠程機器人手術在骨盆骨折中的應用療效分析. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2025, 39(4): 391-398.Dai YH, Yang KY, Zeng YH, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of 5G remote robotic surgery in pelvic fractures. Chin J Repar Reconstr Surg, 2025, 39(4): 391-398.
38.	Fan Y, Ma C, Wu X, et al. 5G remote robot-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a report of five cases and a literature review. Int J Med Robot, 2025, 21(1): e70027.
39.	中國醫師協會外科醫師分會微創外科專家工作組, 中華醫學會外科學分會腹腔鏡與內鏡外科學組, 中國醫師協會外科醫師分會機器人外科專家工作組, 等. 5G遠程控制機器人輔助肝膽胰外科手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中國實用外科雜志, 2025, 45(6): 601-610.Minimally Invasive Surgery Expert Working Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Robotic Surgery Expert Working Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, et al. Chinese expert consensus on 5G remote-controlled robotic-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Pract Surg, 2025, 45(6): 601-610.
40.	Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, et al. Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer? simulator. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9): 2569-2576.
41.	賀杰, 詹納智, 劉光平, 等. 遠程外科手術的研究進展和應用展望. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 729-736.He J, Zhan NZ, Liu GP, et al. Research progress and application prospects of remote surgical operations. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 729-736.
42.	Godley F, Fer D, Patel AD, et al. Remote robotic surgery: implementing a technology 20 years in the making. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(4): 2743-2747.
43.	Guo HH, Tian Y, Ding PA, et al. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted remote radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on 5G communication technology (FUTURE-04): a prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Gastric Cancer, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01552-9. (Online First, 2025-10-08).
44.	梁霄, 沈展帆, 范育喜, 等. 5G-超長距離機器人輔助肝切除臨床實踐初步探索. 中華外科雜志, 2025, 63(6): 508-514.Liang X, Shen ZF, Fan YX, et al. A preliminary exploration of clinical practice in 5G-ultra-long-distance robot-assisted liver resection. Chin J Surg, 2025, 63(6): 508-514.
45.	Yang J, Zhan WP, Zhang ZP, et al. The safety and feasibility of telerobotic cholecystectomy via a 5G network: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(11): 7336-7346.
46.	Patel V, Saikali S, Moschovas MC, et al. Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 40-53.
47.	Moschovas MC, Dohler M, Patel V. Telesurgery: challenges, ethical considerations, and opportunities in the robotic surgery era. Eur Urol Focus, 2025, 11(1): 40-42.
48.	Aldousari S, Almarzouq A, Hassan A, et al. The era of telesurgery: insights from ultra-long-distance Asia to Middle East human telesurgery robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 108-120.
49.	Haruki T, Takagi Y, Kubouchi Y, et al. Comparison between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2021, 33(3): 409-417.
50.	Manigrasso M, D’Amore A, Maione F, et al. Fully robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy versus hybrid robotic esophagectomy—a review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(24): 7501-7519.
51.	Hurley PD, Fabbri G, Berjaoui N, et al. Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach. Front Surg, 2024, 11: 1395884.
52.	Xie HK, Dai CY, Gu C, et al. Validation of the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer residual tumor classification to upgrade extracapsular extension of tumor in nodes from R0 to incomplete resection. J Thorac Oncol, 2024, 19(1): 130-140.
53.	Tian W, Fan MX, Zeng C, et al. Telerobotic spinal surgery based on 5G network: the first 12 cases. Neurospine, 2020, 17(1): 114-120.
54.	李松巖, 聞巍, 戴飛翔, 等. 超遠程手術機器人輔助直腸癌根治術臨床初步研究. 中國實用外科雜志, 2024, 44(3): 308-311.Li SY, Wen W, Dai FX, et al. Preliminary clinical study of ultra-long-distance surgical robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. Chin J Pract Surg, 2024, 44(3): 308-311.
55.	Moschovas MC, Rogers T, Xu WH, et al. First impressions of telesurgery robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Edge medical robotic platform. Int Braz J Urol, 2024, 50(6): 754-763.
56.	中國醫師協會婦產科醫師分會, 中國婦幼保健協會婦科智能醫學專業委員會. 遠程控制機器人輔助婦科手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中華腔鏡外科雜志(電子版), 2025, 18(5): 257-263.Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Gynecological Intelligent Medicine Professional Committee, Chinese Maternal and Child Health Association. Chinese expert consensus on remote-controlled robotic-assisted gynecological surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Laparoscopic Surg (Electron Ed), 2025, 18(5): 257-263.
57.	中華醫學會外科學分會結直腸外科學組, 中華醫學會外科學分會腹腔鏡與內鏡外科學組, 中國研究型醫院學會結直腸肛門外科專業委員會, 等. 5G遠程控制機器人輔助結直腸癌手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中國實用外科雜志, 2025, 45(2): 149-155.Colorectal Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Colorectal and Anal Surgery Professional Committee, Chinese Research Hospital Association, et al. Chinese expert consensus on 5G remote-controlled robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Pract Surg, 2025, 45(2): 149-155.
58.	Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery, 2015, 158(1): 3-6.
59.	Korte C, Nair SS, Nistor V, et al. Determining the threshold of time-delay for teleoperation accuracy and efficiency in relation to telesurgery. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20(12): 1078-1086.
60.	Chepkoech M, Malila B, Mwangama J. Telementoring for surgical training in low-resource settings: a systematic review of current systems and the emerging role of 5G, AI, and XR. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 52-64.
61.	Chia DKA, Suda K, Ho WE, et al. Feasibility of long-range telesurgical robotic radical gastrectomy in a live porcine model. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(12): 7720-7728.
62.	Wu CG, Tang YM, Kuo WT, et al. Healthcare 5. 0: a secure and distributed network for system informatics in medical surgery. Int J Med Inform, 2024, 186: 105415.
63.	Rosen J, Hannaford B, Richards CG, et al. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2001, 48(5): 579-591.
64.	Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, et al. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. BJS, 2024, 111(1): znad320.
65.	Seo HJ, Lee NR, Son SK, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(5): 1165-1177.
66.	Buffi NM, Piccolini A, Moretto S, et al. Reliability of the da Vinci robotic surgical system: a systematic review and pooled analysis of technical failures. World J Urol, 2025, 43(1): 34-45.
67.	Colan J, Davila A, Hasegawa Y. Tactile feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot, 2024, 20(6): e70019.
68.	El Rassi I, El Rassi JM. A review of haptic feedback in tele-operated robotic surgery. J Med Eng Technol, 2020, 44(5): 247-254.
69.	李然, 婁巖. 拓展現實技術在臨床手術中的應用. 南方醫科大學學報, 2023, 43(1): 128-132.Li R, Lou Y. Application of extended reality technology in clinical surgery. J South Med Univ, 2023, 43(1): 128-132.
70.	Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R, et al. The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 214(2): 214-230.
71.	Etherington N, Wu M, Cheng-Boivin O, et al. Interprofessional communication in the operating room: a narrative review to advance research and practice. Can J Anaesth, 2019, 66(10): 1251-1260.
72.	Mori M, Hirano S, Hakamada K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for telesurgery 2022. Surg Today, 2024, 54(8): 817-828.
73.	Oki E, Ota M, Nakanoko T, et al. Telesurgery and telesurgical support using a double-surgeon cockpit system allowing manipulation from two locations. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(7): 5707-5715.
74.	Mao RDQ, Lan L, Kay J, et al. Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: a systematic review. J Surg Res, 2021, 268: 40-58.
75.	Sobbi SC, Hamid UI, Rad AA, et al. Telesimulation training for endoscopic mitral valve surgery: an air-pilot training concept for distance training. Innovations (Phila), 2024, 19(2): 169-174.
76.	Wisotzky EL, Rosenthal JC, Meij S, et al. Telepresence for surgical assistance and training using eXtended reality during and after pandemic periods. J Telemed Telecare, 2025, 31(1): 14-28.
77.	何鞠師, 游靜. “互聯網+”醫療損害責任分擔規則研究. 醫學與法學, 2023, 15(3): 42-47.He JS, You J. A study on the liability sharing rules for medical damages in the context of “Internet +”. Med Jurisprud, 2023, 15(3): 42-47.
78.	O’Sullivan S, Nevejans N, Allen C, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot, 2019, 15(1): e1968.
79.	李紅強, 殷德濤. 5G遠程機器人手術臨床應用相關問題思考. 醫學與哲學, 2025, 46(9): 36-39.Li HQ, Yin DT. Considerations on the clinical application of 5G remote robotic surgery. Med Philos, 2025, 46(9): 36-39.
80.	吳曉巍, 方馳華. 人工智能醫工理融合助推智慧外科跨越式發展. 中華外科雜志, 2025, 64(1): 21-26.Wu XW, Fang CH. Artificial intelligence accelerates bridging the gap in intelligent surgery through medical-engineering-mathematical integration. Chin J Surg, 2025, 64(1): 21-26.
81.	Sadeghi AH, Mank Q, Tuzcu AS, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted augmented reality robotic lung surgery: navigating the future of thoracic surgery. JTCVS Tech, 2024, 26: 121-125.
82.	Alba C, Xue B, Abraham J, et al. The foundational capabilities of large language models in predicting postoperative risks using clinical notes. NPJ Digit Med, 2025, 8(1): 95-106.
83.	張恩齊, 孔令勝. 混合現實技術在腹部手術中的應用進展. 結直腸肛門外科, 2025, 31(4): 298-302.Zhang EQ, Kong LS. Advancements in the application of mixed reality technology in abdominal surgery. J Colorectal Anal Surg, 2025, 31(4): 298-302.
84.	葛新斌, 莊穎, 沈可欣, 等. 基于Apple Vision Pro的模塊化增強現實系統在機器人輔助腹腔鏡直腸癌根治術中的應用. 結直腸肛門外科, 2025, 31(4): 308-313.Ge XB, Zhuang Y, Shen KX, et al. Application of a modular augmented reality system based on Apple Vision Pro in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. J Colorectal Anal Surg, 2025, 31(4): 308-313.
85.	Rae-Dupree J. Feel the precision: next-gen robotic surgery with haptic feedback. IEEE Pulse, 2025, 16(1): 12-15.
86.	Rogers T, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, et al. Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 381-396.
87.	賀杰, 何昆侖, 湯俊君, 等. 面向方艙醫院應急場景的多鏈路遠程手術機器人系統創新設計與驗證. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 743-747.He J, He KL, Tang JJ, et al. Innovative design and verification of a multi-link remote surgical robot system for emergency scenarios in Fangcang hospitals. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 743-747.
88.	俞波. 基于5G技術的智慧急救平臺架構研究. 江蘇通信, 2025, 41(1): 18-20.Yu B. Research on the architecture of the smart emergency rescue platform based on 5G technology. Jiangsu Commun, 2025, 41(1): 18-20.
89.	楊文界, 彭小菊, 向海平, 等. 5G遠程重癥監護協同平臺在急救和遠程會診中的實踐與應用. 2024第六屆智慧醫院建設與發展大會. 蘇州. 2024: 41-44.Yang WJ, Peng XJ, Xiang HP, et al. Practice and application of the 5G remote intensive care collaborative platform in emergency rescue and remote consultation. Proceedings of the 6th Smart Hospital Construction and Development Conference 2024. Suzhou. 2024: 41-44.
90.	劉威, 劉亞楠. 空天地一體化網絡地面運營商業務發展策略研究. 郵電設計技術, 2024(10): 49-53.Liu W, Liu YN. Research on business development strategies for ground operators in the space-air-ground integrated network. Des Tech Posts Telecommun, 2024(10): 49-53.
91.	袁永一, 劉威, 邵航, 等. 基于5G技術及4K/3D手術系統的顯微外科遠程手術會診平臺的設計及實踐. 中國醫療設備, 2023, 38(1): 98-102.Yuan YY, Liu W, Shao H, et al. Design and practice of a microsurgical remote surgical consultation platform based on 5G technology and 4K/3D surgical systems. China Med Devices, 2023, 38(1): 98-102.
92.	楊辰旭, 李澍, 王浩, 等. 行業標準《采用機器人技術的腹腔內窺鏡手術系統》解讀. 協和醫學雜志, 2025, 16(5): 1199-1206.Yang CX, Li S, Wang H, et al. Interpretation of the industry standard “Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical systems using robot technology”. Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, 2025, 16(5): 1199-1206.
93.	Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(18): 1679-1681.
94.	Kewalramani D, Narayan M. Innovation in surgical education and increasing the surgical workforce. Surg Clin North Am, 2025, 105(6): 1073-1085.
95.	黎卓芳, 劉慧敏, 解博森. 5G高可靠低時延通信標準現狀及產業進展. 信息通信技術與政策, 2022(4): 37-42.Li ZF, Liu HM, Xie BS. Current status and industrial progress of 5G high-reliability and low-latency communication standards. Inf Commun Technol Policy, 2022(4): 37-42.
96.	Focsa MA, Rotaru V, Andronic O, et al. Bridging gaps in telemedicine education in Romania to support future health care: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ, 2025, 11: e66458.
97.	Gao L, Chen ML, Wei JX, et al. The Chinese version of the DigiHealthCom (digital health competence) instrument for assessing digital health competence of health care professionals: translation, adaptation, and validation study. JMIR Hum Factors, 2025, 12: e65373.
98.	Erskine J, Abrishami P, Bernhard JC, et al. An international consensus panel on the potential value of Digital Surgery. BMJ Open, 2024, 14(9): e082875.
99.	Agri F, M?ller W, Deslarzes P, et al. Cost analysis of outpatient colectomy in a tertiary center: a projected medico-economic evaluation. Health Serv Insights, 2024, 17: 11786329241284400.
100.	Ding Y, Wang S, Lan R, et al. Telerobotic surgery: a comprehensive two-decade evolution and the integration of emerging technologies. Int J Surg, 2025, 112: 1652-1672.
101.	Motiwala ZY, Desai A, Bisht R, et al. Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 15-26.
102.	Hosseini MM, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Haghighi E, et al. The revolutionary impact of 6G technology on empowering health and building a smart society: a scoping review. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 194: 110496.

1. Pan HB, Zou NY, Tian Y, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic sub-lobar resection for octogenarians with clinical stage ⅠA non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched real-world study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(3): 1658-1667.
2. Mirza W, Javid A, Khan ME, et al. Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 65-77.
3. Coco D, Leanza S. State of the art of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic-style evidence synthesis. J Robot Surg, 2025, 20(1): 108-119.
4. Du XY, Du YT, Zhang YJ, et al. Urban and rural disparities in general hospital accessibility within a Chinese metropolis. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 23359.
5. Xia SB, Lu QS. Development status of telesurgery robotic system. Chin J Traumatol, 2021, 24(3): 144-147.
6. Reddy SK, Saikali S, Gamal A, et al. Telesurgery: a systematic literature review and future directions. Ann Surg, 2025, 282(2): 219-227.
7. Barba P, Stramiello J, Funk EK, et al. Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(5): 2771-2777.
8. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature, 2001, 413(6854): 379-380.
9. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg, 2002, 235(4): 487-492.
10. Georgiou KE, Georgiou E, Satava RM. 5G use in healthcare: the future is present. JSLS, 2021, 25(4): e2021.00064.
11. Moustris G, Tzafestas C, Konstantinidis K. A long distance telesurgical demonstration on robotic surgery phantoms over 5G. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2023, 18(9): 1577-1587.
12. Zhang MZ, Hu M, Yang J, et al. A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol, 2025, 23(1): 117.
13. Tian Y, Lv HB, Jumai A, et al. Ultra-remote robot-assisted right upper lobectomy between the Shanghai and Kashi Prefectures: a case report. J Thorac Dis, 2024, 16(12): 8823-8830.
14. 左莊, 唐旭, 陳文龍, 等. 5G遠程機器人輔助胸腔鏡手術五例. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2025, 32(5): 594-597.Zuo Z, Tang X, Chen WL, et al. Five cases of 5G remote robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2025, 32(5): 594-597.
15. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(8): 701-704.
16. Zhou LP, Zhang XL, Zhang HQ, et al. 5G-enabled remote robotic-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in single thoracolumbar fractures: initial clinical feasibility and safety evaluation. Eur Spine J, 2025, 34(1): 123-130.
17. Rocco B, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, et al. Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 240-251.
18. Takano H, Ebihara Y, Hirano S, et al. Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 66-74.
19. Legeza P, Britz GW, Shah AL, et al. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(1): 29-35.
20. Dohler M, Saikali S, Gamal A, et al. The crucial role of 5G, 6G, and fiber in robotic telesurgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 19(1): 4-14.
21. 康琳, 張文治, 郝文勝, 等. 基于BFD協議的承載網業務毫秒級保護方案研究及實踐. 郵電設計技術, 2025(6): 65-70.Kang L, Zhang WZ, Hao WS, et al. Research and practice of millisecond-level protection scheme for bearer network services based on BFD protocol. Des Tech Posts Telecommun, 2025(6): 65-70.
22. Qu Y, Li L, Li T, et al. Smart surgical telementoring system with patch-to-pixel point tracking method. EngMedicine, 2025, 2(1): e25001.
23. Li Y, Raison N, Ourselin S, et al. AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 403-418.
24. Xie X, Tian Y, Huang J, et al. Surgery without distance: will 5G-based robot-assisted telesurgery redefine modern surgery?. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2025, 14(5): 1821-1829.
25. 黃韻翰, 周逢海, 郭柏鴻. 基于5G通信技術的遠程機器人手術應用研究進展及關鍵技術分析. 中國微創外科雜志, 2024, 24(2): 138-142.Huang YH, Zhou FH, Guo BH. Research progress and key technology analysis of remote robotic surgery application based on 5G communication technology. Chin J Minim Invasive Surg, 2024, 24(2): 138-142.
26. Liang H, Liang W, Lei Z, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted endoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical data. World J Surg, 2018, 42(11): 3658-3668.
27. Saracino A, Oude-Vrielink TJC, Menciassi A, et al. Haptic intracorporeal palpation using a cable-driven parallel robot: a user study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2020, 67(12): 3452-3463.
28. Trute RJ, Alijani A, Erden MS. Visual cues of soft-tissue behaviour in minimal-invasive and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 401-416.
29. Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, et al. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 129(1): 151-158.
30. Hamza H, Aboumarzouk OM, Al-Ansari A, et al. Dynamic augmented reality cues for telementoring in minimally invasive surgeries: scoping review. J Med Internet Res, 2025, 27: e63939.
31. Sutkin G, Steele C, Brommelsiek M, et al. Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 406-417.
32. Brian R, Sterponi L, Murillo A, et al. Ambiguity in robotic surgical instruction: lessons from remote and in-person simulation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2025, 30(5): 1387-1401.
33. 苑航, 駱磊, 焦偉, 等. 遠程手術機器人輔助腹腔鏡根治性腎切除術第一助手的配合. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2024, 5(6): 1221-1224.Yuan H, Luo L, Jiao W, et al. Cooperation of the first assistant in remote surgical robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Robotic Surg (Chinese English), 2024, 5(6): 1221-1224.
34. Nyberg A, Jirwe M, Fagerdahl A, et al. Perioperative patient safety indicators—a Delphi study. J Clin Nurs, 2025, 34(4): 1351-1363.
35. Li JM, Yang XC, Chu GD, et al. Application of improved robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery with 5G technology in urology. Eur Urol, 2023, 83(1): 41-44.
36. 宋佳純, 蘭彬, 劉帛巖, 等. 5G移動遠程機器人手術1例報告并文獻復習. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 754-758.Song JC, Lan B, Liu BY, et al. A case report of 5G mobile remote robotic surgery and literature review. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 754-758.
37. 代永鴻, 楊匡洋, 曾焰輝, 等. 5G遠程機器人手術在骨盆骨折中的應用療效分析. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2025, 39(4): 391-398.Dai YH, Yang KY, Zeng YH, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of 5G remote robotic surgery in pelvic fractures. Chin J Repar Reconstr Surg, 2025, 39(4): 391-398.
38. Fan Y, Ma C, Wu X, et al. 5G remote robot-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a report of five cases and a literature review. Int J Med Robot, 2025, 21(1): e70027.
39. 中國醫師協會外科醫師分會微創外科專家工作組, 中華醫學會外科學分會腹腔鏡與內鏡外科學組, 中國醫師協會外科醫師分會機器人外科專家工作組, 等. 5G遠程控制機器人輔助肝膽胰外科手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中國實用外科雜志, 2025, 45(6): 601-610.Minimally Invasive Surgery Expert Working Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Robotic Surgery Expert Working Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, et al. Chinese expert consensus on 5G remote-controlled robotic-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Pract Surg, 2025, 45(6): 601-610.
40. Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, et al. Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer? simulator. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9): 2569-2576.
41. 賀杰, 詹納智, 劉光平, 等. 遠程外科手術的研究進展和應用展望. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 729-736.He J, Zhan NZ, Liu GP, et al. Research progress and application prospects of remote surgical operations. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 729-736.
42. Godley F, Fer D, Patel AD, et al. Remote robotic surgery: implementing a technology 20 years in the making. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(4): 2743-2747.
43. Guo HH, Tian Y, Ding PA, et al. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted remote radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on 5G communication technology (FUTURE-04): a prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Gastric Cancer, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01552-9. (Online First, 2025-10-08).
44. 梁霄, 沈展帆, 范育喜, 等. 5G-超長距離機器人輔助肝切除臨床實踐初步探索. 中華外科雜志, 2025, 63(6): 508-514.Liang X, Shen ZF, Fan YX, et al. A preliminary exploration of clinical practice in 5G-ultra-long-distance robot-assisted liver resection. Chin J Surg, 2025, 63(6): 508-514.
45. Yang J, Zhan WP, Zhang ZP, et al. The safety and feasibility of telerobotic cholecystectomy via a 5G network: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(11): 7336-7346.
46. Patel V, Saikali S, Moschovas MC, et al. Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 40-53.
47. Moschovas MC, Dohler M, Patel V. Telesurgery: challenges, ethical considerations, and opportunities in the robotic surgery era. Eur Urol Focus, 2025, 11(1): 40-42.
48. Aldousari S, Almarzouq A, Hassan A, et al. The era of telesurgery: insights from ultra-long-distance Asia to Middle East human telesurgery robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 108-120.
49. Haruki T, Takagi Y, Kubouchi Y, et al. Comparison between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2021, 33(3): 409-417.
50. Manigrasso M, D’Amore A, Maione F, et al. Fully robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy versus hybrid robotic esophagectomy—a review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(24): 7501-7519.
51. Hurley PD, Fabbri G, Berjaoui N, et al. Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach. Front Surg, 2024, 11: 1395884.
52. Xie HK, Dai CY, Gu C, et al. Validation of the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer residual tumor classification to upgrade extracapsular extension of tumor in nodes from R0 to incomplete resection. J Thorac Oncol, 2024, 19(1): 130-140.
53. Tian W, Fan MX, Zeng C, et al. Telerobotic spinal surgery based on 5G network: the first 12 cases. Neurospine, 2020, 17(1): 114-120.
54. 李松巖, 聞巍, 戴飛翔, 等. 超遠程手術機器人輔助直腸癌根治術臨床初步研究. 中國實用外科雜志, 2024, 44(3): 308-311.Li SY, Wen W, Dai FX, et al. Preliminary clinical study of ultra-long-distance surgical robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. Chin J Pract Surg, 2024, 44(3): 308-311.
55. Moschovas MC, Rogers T, Xu WH, et al. First impressions of telesurgery robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Edge medical robotic platform. Int Braz J Urol, 2024, 50(6): 754-763.
56. 中國醫師協會婦產科醫師分會, 中國婦幼保健協會婦科智能醫學專業委員會. 遠程控制機器人輔助婦科手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中華腔鏡外科雜志(電子版), 2025, 18(5): 257-263.Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Gynecological Intelligent Medicine Professional Committee, Chinese Maternal and Child Health Association. Chinese expert consensus on remote-controlled robotic-assisted gynecological surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Laparoscopic Surg (Electron Ed), 2025, 18(5): 257-263.
57. 中華醫學會外科學分會結直腸外科學組, 中華醫學會外科學分會腹腔鏡與內鏡外科學組, 中國研究型醫院學會結直腸肛門外科專業委員會, 等. 5G遠程控制機器人輔助結直腸癌手術中國專家共識(2025版). 中國實用外科雜志, 2025, 45(2): 149-155.Colorectal Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Group, Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Association; Colorectal and Anal Surgery Professional Committee, Chinese Research Hospital Association, et al. Chinese expert consensus on 5G remote-controlled robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery (2025 edition). Chin J Pract Surg, 2025, 45(2): 149-155.
58. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery, 2015, 158(1): 3-6.
59. Korte C, Nair SS, Nistor V, et al. Determining the threshold of time-delay for teleoperation accuracy and efficiency in relation to telesurgery. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20(12): 1078-1086.
60. Chepkoech M, Malila B, Mwangama J. Telementoring for surgical training in low-resource settings: a systematic review of current systems and the emerging role of 5G, AI, and XR. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 52-64.
61. Chia DKA, Suda K, Ho WE, et al. Feasibility of long-range telesurgical robotic radical gastrectomy in a live porcine model. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(12): 7720-7728.
62. Wu CG, Tang YM, Kuo WT, et al. Healthcare 5. 0: a secure and distributed network for system informatics in medical surgery. Int J Med Inform, 2024, 186: 105415.
63. Rosen J, Hannaford B, Richards CG, et al. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2001, 48(5): 579-591.
64. Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, et al. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. BJS, 2024, 111(1): znad320.
65. Seo HJ, Lee NR, Son SK, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(5): 1165-1177.
66. Buffi NM, Piccolini A, Moretto S, et al. Reliability of the da Vinci robotic surgical system: a systematic review and pooled analysis of technical failures. World J Urol, 2025, 43(1): 34-45.
67. Colan J, Davila A, Hasegawa Y. Tactile feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot, 2024, 20(6): e70019.
68. El Rassi I, El Rassi JM. A review of haptic feedback in tele-operated robotic surgery. J Med Eng Technol, 2020, 44(5): 247-254.
69. 李然, 婁巖. 拓展現實技術在臨床手術中的應用. 南方醫科大學學報, 2023, 43(1): 128-132.Li R, Lou Y. Application of extended reality technology in clinical surgery. J South Med Univ, 2023, 43(1): 128-132.
70. Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R, et al. The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 214(2): 214-230.
71. Etherington N, Wu M, Cheng-Boivin O, et al. Interprofessional communication in the operating room: a narrative review to advance research and practice. Can J Anaesth, 2019, 66(10): 1251-1260.
72. Mori M, Hirano S, Hakamada K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for telesurgery 2022. Surg Today, 2024, 54(8): 817-828.
73. Oki E, Ota M, Nakanoko T, et al. Telesurgery and telesurgical support using a double-surgeon cockpit system allowing manipulation from two locations. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(7): 5707-5715.
74. Mao RDQ, Lan L, Kay J, et al. Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: a systematic review. J Surg Res, 2021, 268: 40-58.
75. Sobbi SC, Hamid UI, Rad AA, et al. Telesimulation training for endoscopic mitral valve surgery: an air-pilot training concept for distance training. Innovations (Phila), 2024, 19(2): 169-174.
76. Wisotzky EL, Rosenthal JC, Meij S, et al. Telepresence for surgical assistance and training using eXtended reality during and after pandemic periods. J Telemed Telecare, 2025, 31(1): 14-28.
77. 何鞠師, 游靜. “互聯網+”醫療損害責任分擔規則研究. 醫學與法學, 2023, 15(3): 42-47.He JS, You J. A study on the liability sharing rules for medical damages in the context of “Internet +”. Med Jurisprud, 2023, 15(3): 42-47.
78. O’Sullivan S, Nevejans N, Allen C, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot, 2019, 15(1): e1968.
79. 李紅強, 殷德濤. 5G遠程機器人手術臨床應用相關問題思考. 醫學與哲學, 2025, 46(9): 36-39.Li HQ, Yin DT. Considerations on the clinical application of 5G remote robotic surgery. Med Philos, 2025, 46(9): 36-39.
80. 吳曉巍, 方馳華. 人工智能醫工理融合助推智慧外科跨越式發展. 中華外科雜志, 2025, 64(1): 21-26.Wu XW, Fang CH. Artificial intelligence accelerates bridging the gap in intelligent surgery through medical-engineering-mathematical integration. Chin J Surg, 2025, 64(1): 21-26.
81. Sadeghi AH, Mank Q, Tuzcu AS, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted augmented reality robotic lung surgery: navigating the future of thoracic surgery. JTCVS Tech, 2024, 26: 121-125.
82. Alba C, Xue B, Abraham J, et al. The foundational capabilities of large language models in predicting postoperative risks using clinical notes. NPJ Digit Med, 2025, 8(1): 95-106.
83. 張恩齊, 孔令勝. 混合現實技術在腹部手術中的應用進展. 結直腸肛門外科, 2025, 31(4): 298-302.Zhang EQ, Kong LS. Advancements in the application of mixed reality technology in abdominal surgery. J Colorectal Anal Surg, 2025, 31(4): 298-302.
84. 葛新斌, 莊穎, 沈可欣, 等. 基于Apple Vision Pro的模塊化增強現實系統在機器人輔助腹腔鏡直腸癌根治術中的應用. 結直腸肛門外科, 2025, 31(4): 308-313.Ge XB, Zhuang Y, Shen KX, et al. Application of a modular augmented reality system based on Apple Vision Pro in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. J Colorectal Anal Surg, 2025, 31(4): 308-313.
85. Rae-Dupree J. Feel the precision: next-gen robotic surgery with haptic feedback. IEEE Pulse, 2025, 16(1): 12-15.
86. Rogers T, Moschovas MC, Saikali S, et al. Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 381-396.
87. 賀杰, 何昆侖, 湯俊君, 等. 面向方艙醫院應急場景的多鏈路遠程手術機器人系統創新設計與驗證. 解放軍醫學院學報, 2025, 46(8): 743-747.He J, He KL, Tang JJ, et al. Innovative design and verification of a multi-link remote surgical robot system for emergency scenarios in Fangcang hospitals. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2025, 46(8): 743-747.
88. 俞波. 基于5G技術的智慧急救平臺架構研究. 江蘇通信, 2025, 41(1): 18-20.Yu B. Research on the architecture of the smart emergency rescue platform based on 5G technology. Jiangsu Commun, 2025, 41(1): 18-20.
89. 楊文界, 彭小菊, 向海平, 等. 5G遠程重癥監護協同平臺在急救和遠程會診中的實踐與應用. 2024第六屆智慧醫院建設與發展大會. 蘇州. 2024: 41-44.Yang WJ, Peng XJ, Xiang HP, et al. Practice and application of the 5G remote intensive care collaborative platform in emergency rescue and remote consultation. Proceedings of the 6th Smart Hospital Construction and Development Conference 2024. Suzhou. 2024: 41-44.
90. 劉威, 劉亞楠. 空天地一體化網絡地面運營商業務發展策略研究. 郵電設計技術, 2024(10): 49-53.Liu W, Liu YN. Research on business development strategies for ground operators in the space-air-ground integrated network. Des Tech Posts Telecommun, 2024(10): 49-53.
91. 袁永一, 劉威, 邵航, 等. 基于5G技術及4K/3D手術系統的顯微外科遠程手術會診平臺的設計及實踐. 中國醫療設備, 2023, 38(1): 98-102.Yuan YY, Liu W, Shao H, et al. Design and practice of a microsurgical remote surgical consultation platform based on 5G technology and 4K/3D surgical systems. China Med Devices, 2023, 38(1): 98-102.
92. 楊辰旭, 李澍, 王浩, 等. 行業標準《采用機器人技術的腹腔內窺鏡手術系統》解讀. 協和醫學雜志, 2025, 16(5): 1199-1206.Yang CX, Li S, Wang H, et al. Interpretation of the industry standard “Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical systems using robot technology”. Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, 2025, 16(5): 1199-1206.
93. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(18): 1679-1681.
94. Kewalramani D, Narayan M. Innovation in surgical education and increasing the surgical workforce. Surg Clin North Am, 2025, 105(6): 1073-1085.
95. 黎卓芳, 劉慧敏, 解博森. 5G高可靠低時延通信標準現狀及產業進展. 信息通信技術與政策, 2022(4): 37-42.Li ZF, Liu HM, Xie BS. Current status and industrial progress of 5G high-reliability and low-latency communication standards. Inf Commun Technol Policy, 2022(4): 37-42.
96. Focsa MA, Rotaru V, Andronic O, et al. Bridging gaps in telemedicine education in Romania to support future health care: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ, 2025, 11: e66458.
97. Gao L, Chen ML, Wei JX, et al. The Chinese version of the DigiHealthCom (digital health competence) instrument for assessing digital health competence of health care professionals: translation, adaptation, and validation study. JMIR Hum Factors, 2025, 12: e65373.
98. Erskine J, Abrishami P, Bernhard JC, et al. An international consensus panel on the potential value of Digital Surgery. BMJ Open, 2024, 14(9): e082875.
99. Agri F, M?ller W, Deslarzes P, et al. Cost analysis of outpatient colectomy in a tertiary center: a projected medico-economic evaluation. Health Serv Insights, 2024, 17: 11786329241284400.
100. Ding Y, Wang S, Lan R, et al. Telerobotic surgery: a comprehensive two-decade evolution and the integration of emerging technologies. Int J Surg, 2025, 112: 1652-1672.
101. Motiwala ZY, Desai A, Bisht R, et al. Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 15-26.
102. Hosseini MM, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Haghighi E, et al. The revolutionary impact of 6G technology on empowering health and building a smart society: a scoping review. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 194: 110496.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

5G-enabled remote robot-assisted thoracic surgery: Clinical outcomes, current challenges, and future perspectives

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content