In November 2017, the American Heart Association updated the pediatric basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. The new guidelines focused on the clinical value of chest compression-only CPR versus CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths in children, rather than a comprehensive revision of the 2015 edition guidelines. The Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated part content of the guidelines according to the continuous evidence review process. Guidelines recommend CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths should be provided for infants and children with cardiac arrest. Bystanders provide chest compressions if they are unwilling or unable to deliver rescue breaths. This article mainly interprets the updated content.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of damage control in intra-abdominal sepsis. MethodsThe related literatures were searched by searching literatures with " damage control” " damage control resuscitation” damage control surgery”, and " intra-abdominal sepsis”, to made an review. Results Despite significant advances in management and treatment, mortality from intra-abdominal sepsis remained still high. Due to its unique anatomic and microbial environment, initial operation could not completely remove the source of infection and avoid complications. Therefore, it was becoming increasingly popular to utilize a damage control strategy with abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperations. ConclusionsDamage control is characterized by staged treatment, and is widely accepted used to manage intra-abdominal sepsis.
Although the survival rate reported in each center is different, according to the present studies, compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can improve the survival rate of cardiac arrest patient, no matter out-of-hospital or in-hospital. The obvious advantage of ECPR is that it can reduce the nervous system complications in the cardiac arrest patients and improve survival rate to hospital discharge. However, ECPR is expensive and without the uniformed indications for implantation. The prognosis for patients with ECPR support is also variant due to the different etiology. If we want to achieve better result, the ECPR technology itself needs to be further improved.
The American Heart Association (AHA) released the 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality (2017 AHA guidelines update) in November 2017. The 2017 AHA guidelines update was updated according to the rules named " the update of the guideline is no longer released every five years, but whenever new evidence is available” in the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. The updated content in this guideline included five parts: dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander CPR, emergency medical services - delivered CRP, CRP for cardiac arrest, and chest compression - to - ventilation ratio. This review will interpret the 2017 AHA guidelines update in detail.
Objective To evaluate the effects and the clinical significances of liquid resuscitation on blood gas analysis， acid-base balance， electrolytes， acute physiology and chronic health evaluationsⅡ（APACHEⅡ） score of patients with septic shock， and then to analyze the relations between serum chlorine （Cl－） level and APACHEⅡscore and the volume of liquid resuscitation. Methods According to the target of resuscitation （centre venous pressure 8-12mm Hg and mean arterial pressure≥65mm Hg）， 21 patients with septic shock received enough fluid for resuscitation during 24h . The results of blood gas analysis， acid-base balance， electrolytes， and APACHE Ⅱ score were compared between pre-resuscitation and 24h post-resuscitation by self-controlled prospective study. The relationships of the level of serum Cl－ and APACHEⅡ score with the volume of liquid used in resuscitation were analyzed . Results The mean resus-citation duration was （18.09±4.57） h， and the volume of liquid during 24 h resuscitation was 5 320-11 028mL with mean volume of （7 775±1 735） mL in 21 patients with septic shock. Serum sodium （Na＋， mmol/L） and Cl－（mmol/L）levels of post-resuscitation were significant higher than those of pre-resuscitation （Na＋：138.71±5.67 versus 135.62±7.23， P=0.024；Cl－：109.10±4.90 versus 101.67±8.59， P=0.000）. Compared with the levels of pre-resuscitation， the blood pH value， hematocrit （Hct，%）， anion gap （AG， mmol/L）， lactic acid （mmol/L）， and APACHE Ⅱscore significantly decreased （pH：7.31±0.05 versus 7.37±0.06， P=0.000；Hct：28.48±2.56 versus 32.76±9.19， P=0.049；AG：8.33±3.45 versus 14.17±8.83， P=0.004；lactic acid：1.66±0.89 versus 2.96±1.23， P=0.001；APACHEⅡ：10.90±3.73 versus 17.24±4.06， P=0.000） after 24h resuscitation. The correlation analysis showed that the level of serum Cl- was positively correlated with the volume of liquid used in resuscitation （r=0.717，P＜0.01）. However， there was no correlation between APACHEⅡscore and the volume of liquid used in resuscitation （P＞0.05）. Conclusions The target of liquid resuscitation in patients with septic shock should be cautiously determined， including control of the volume of crystal liquid for resuscitation， in order to avoid acid-base imbalance or hyperchloraemia. At the same time， the change in internal environment should be monitored. An optimistic fluid resuscitation to decrease APACHE Ⅱ score in patients with septic shock is unrelated to the volume of liquid resuscitation.
The treatment of organ function damage secondary to return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiac arrest is an important part of advanced life support. The incidence of lung injury secondary to return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiac arrest is as high as 79%. Understanding the characteristics and related mechanisms of lung injury secondary to return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiac arrest, and early identification and treatment of lung injury secondary to return of spontaneous circulation are crucial to the clinical treatment of patients with cardiac arrest. Therefore, this article reviews the research progress on the characteristics, risk factors, mechanisms and treatment of lung injury secondary to return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiac arrest, in order to provide a reference for the research and clinical diagnosis and treatment of lung injury secondary to return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiac arrest.
Objective To investigate whether pulse pressure variation( ΔPP) reflect the effects of PEEP and fluid resuscitation ( FR) on hemodynamic effects. Methods Twenty critical patients with acute lung injury was ventilated with volume control ( VT =8 mL/kg, Ti/Te = 1∶2) , and PaCO2 was kept at 35 to 45 mm Hg. PEEP was setted as 5 cm H2O and 15 cmH2O in randomized order. Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac index, pulse pressure, central venous pressure, etc. were monitered by PiCCO system.Measurements were performed after the application of 5 cmH2O PEEP ( PEEP5 group) and 15 cm H2OPEEP ( PEEP15 group) respectively. When the PEEP-induced decrease in cardiac index ( CI) was gt; 10% ,measurements were also performed after fluid resuscitation. Results Compared with PEEP5 group, CI was decreased significantly in PEEP15 group( P lt;0. 05) , and ΔPP was increased significantly( P lt; 0. 05) . In 14 patients whose PEEP-induced decrease in CI was gt; 10% , fluid resuscitation increased CI from ( 3. 01 ±0. 57) L·min - 1·m- 2 to ( 3. 62 ±0. 68) L·min- 1 ·m- 2 ( P lt;0. 01) , and decreased ΔPP from ( 17 ±3) % to ( 10 ±2) % ( P lt;0. 01) . PEEP15 -induced decrease in CI was correlated negatively with ΔPP on PEEP5 ( r= - 0.91, P lt;0. 01) and with the PEEP15 -induced increase in ΔPP ( r = - 0. 79, P lt;0. 01) . FR-induced changes in CI correlated with ΔPP before FR ( r =0. 96, P lt; 0. 01) and with the FR-induced decrease in ΔPP ( r= - 0. 95, P lt; 0. 01) . Conclusions In ventilated patients with ALI, ΔPP may be a simple anduseful parameter in predicting and assessing the hemodynamic effects of PEEP and FR.
A 69-year-old male was presented with exercise intolerance and progressive exertional dyspnea for 3 months. His main clinical diagnosis were degenerative valvular disease, severe aortic stenosis, severe aortic regurgitation, severe mitral regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular electrical storm, chronic heart failure, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class Ⅳ heart function. He was encountered with sudden ventricular electrical storm in the emergency room. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was impanted beside during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was successfully performed under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography when hemodynamics permitted. ECMO was withdrawn on the 5th day and discharged on the 21st day. TAVR is safe and effective for the treatment of high-risk aortic stenosis, and ECMO support is the key for the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation published the 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations in Circulation, Resuscitation, and Pediatrics in November 2022. This consensus updates and recommends important aspects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on recently published resuscitation evidence. Herein, we interpret the consensus focusing on adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation including basic life support (ventilation techniques, compressions pause, transport strategies during resuscitation, and resuscitation procedures in drowning), advanced life support (target temperature management, point-of-care ultrasound as a diagnostic tool during cardiac arrest, vasopressin and corticosteroids for cardiac arrest, and post-cardiac arrest coronary angiography), cardiopulmonary resuscitation education/implementation/team (survival prediction after resuscitation of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, basic life support training, advanced life support training, blended learning for life support education, and faculty development approaches for life support courses) and recovery positions on rescue scene. This consensus provides important guidance for clinical practice and clear hints for the development of clinical research.
American Heart Association updated the guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care in November 2019. This focused update incorporates the systematic review conducted by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, an expert group consisting of hundreds of international resuscitation scientists, to identify the new evidence supporting the basic and advanced life support and first aid in emergency medical care. This focused update involves the life chain of CPR (dispatcher-assisted CPR and cardiac arrest centers), advanced cardiovascular life support (advanced airways, vasopressors, and extracorporeal CPR), and first aid for presyncope. This present review aims to interpret these updates by reviewing the literature and comparing the recommendations in this update with previous guidelines.