While lobectomy is the standard surgical procedure for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sublobectomy (segmentectomy/wedge resection) has been gaining progress in early-stage peripheral NSCLC in recent years because it preserves more lung parenchyma and has the advantages of good postoperative lung function, relatively less trauma, and faster recovery. However, there has been a lack of standardized randomized clinical trials to study the survival benefits of sublobectomy. The results of a high-profile study from the USA, CALGB140503, have been the subject of intense industry debate since its presentation at the 2022 World Conference on Lung Cancer (IASLC WCLC 2022). The study, which was published in The New England Journal of Medicine on February 9, 2023, was designed to investigate whether sublobectomy was not inferior to lobectomy in terms of survival in patients with early-stage peripheral NSCLC (tumor diameter≤2 cm). The results showed that sublobectomy was not worse than lobectomy for survival in patients with T1aN0M0 peripheral NSCLC with tumor diameter≤2 cm and pathologically confirmed negative hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Sublobectomy, including anatomical segmentectomy and wedge resection is an effective NSCLC treatment. The results of this study provide strong evidence for the improved outcomes of sublobectomy in terms of lung function protection and are expected to promote the further use of sublobectomy. However, given the limitations of this study, whether sublobectomy, especially wedge resection, can become a standard procedure still needs to be explored. This paper presents an interpretation of this study and we invite experts in the field to discuss its usefulness in guiding clinical practice and summarise its limitations.
Objective Jejunal interposition is an important option for restoring gastrointestinal continuity in patients with complex esophageal cancer in whom the stomach is unavailable for reconstruction due to previous gastrectomy, tumor involvement, failed gastric conduit, or other constraints. Although the jejunum offers a caliber similar to the esophagus, a rich blood supply, and preserved peristaltic function, anatomical variations in mesenteric length and vascular arcades render long-segment and high-level reconstruction susceptible to excessive tension, mesenteric torsion, venous congestion, and inadequate distal perfusion. This consensus aims to provide standardized recommendations for the application of jejunal interposition in this specific patient population. Methods This consensus was developed in accordance with the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development and Chinese national guideline development standards, with reference to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Ⅱ(AGREE Ⅱ), Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), and Scientific, Transparent and Applicable Rankings (STAR) checklists. The project was registered on the international practice guidelines registry platform (PREPARE-2026CN1384). The working group systematically searched Chinese and English evidence addressing 12 clinical questions. Evidence was graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2009 system, with structured appraisal of risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Recommendations were formulated through two rounds of Delphi surveys and a face-to-face consensus meeting, with an agreement threshold of ≥75%. Results The consensus generated 12 recommendations covering indications, selection between jejunum and colon, preoperative assessment, surgical approach and reconstruction route, pedicled jejunal interposition (PJI), supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition (SPJ), indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion assessment, perioperative nutrition, management of anastomotic leakage, long-term follow-up, and special treatment scenarios. Given that the available direct evidence is predominantly derived from single-center retrospective cohorts and case series, recommendations extrapolated from general esophagectomy or other gastrointestinal surgical evidence are deliberately phrased with caution. Conclusion Jejunal interposition is a safe and effective approach for digestive tract reconstruction in patients with complex esophageal cancer in whom the stomach is unavailable. This consensus emphasizes that clinical decision-making should be individualized based on the patient's prior treatment history, reconstruction height, vascular anatomy, technical availability, and institutional experience in the Chinese context.