Objectives To analyze the labeling of drug items for patients with renal insufficiency in our hospital so as to provide reference for rational use of drugs. Methods The drug instructions used in No.1 Hospital of Jilin University in 2017 were collected. According to the classification of pharmacology, the instructions of the top 9 drugs system were selected. The annotation of drug items for patients with renal insufficiency in these pharmaceutical instructions was analyzed. Results A total of 812 drug instructions were included, in which 72.17% did not mark drug instruction for renal insufficiency patients. According to the administration system, the highest unlabeled rate were digestive system drugs; according to the method of administration, the highest unlabeled rate was external preparation of drugs, accounting for 83.33%; according to production enterprises, the highest unlabeled rate were domestic drugs, accounting for 75.55%. There were only 23.40% of the tagging items having guidance of medication, and some with a certain degree of confusion in the annotation. Conclusion The unlabelling situation of drug instructions for renal insufficiency patients is very serious. It should arouse the attention of pharmaceutical manufacturers and the pharmaceutical supervisory department is suggested to strengthen the supervision of drug instructions and regulate the contents of drug labeling in drug instructions, so as to guide the rational use of drugs in clinical practice.
We reported a case of a 61-year-old female patient, six years status post her last cardiac surgery, who was admitted with a chief complaint of bilateral lower extremity edema for over a year, which had acutely worsened with associated chest pain for two days. The patient had a complex cardiac surgical history: 12 years prior, she underwent double valve replacement (aortic and mitral) plus tricuspid valvuloplasty for mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. Nine years ago, she underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and vegetation removal for prosthetic valve vegetation with severe regurgitation. Six years ago, she underwent a transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement and mitral balloon valvuloplasty due to prosthetic mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation. Following evaluation during this admission, she successfully underwent a valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR). The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery. This case report aims to explore the clinical strategy and application of the ViV-TAVR technique for managing bioprosthetic valve failure in patients with a history of complex valvular surgeries.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement for the management of degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent transcatheter mitral valve replacement due to degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2020 to 2023. The analysis included baseline characteristics, surgical details, perioperative complications, and hemodynamic changes during the early postoperative period and subsequent follow-up. Results A total of 31 patients were included in the study, comprising 7 males and 24 females, with an average age of (66.57±9.32) years. The average duration since the initial surgical placement of the bioprosthetic valves was (9.92±3.71) years. The procedures included 7 patients utilizing the transfemoral venous-atrial septal approach and 24 patients employing the transapical approach. All patients exhibited significant improvement in cardiac function postoperatively, with a reduction in the number of patients classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ and those with moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. Echocardiographic assessments revealed a decrease in peak flow velocity across the mitral valve and a reduction in the average transvalvular pressure gradient, while left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged. One patient experienced a recurrent stroke and died on the fifth postoperative day; however, the remaining patients were discharged without complications, including cardiac death, all-cause mortality, or outflow tract obstruction. During a median follow-up period of 12 months, no adverse events were reported, and hemodynamic stability was maintained. Conclusion Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a safe and effective option for patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves, demonstrating favorable hemodynamic outcomes and satisfactory short-term clinical results.