ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of pirfenidone as interventions for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. According to the Cochrane system evaluation method, the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated and the effective data were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsSix studies were included with 1727 patients in total. Compared with placebo groups, pirfenidon could improve the changing rate of vital capacity at the end of the treatment[WMD=0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.12), Z=2.48, P=0.01; heterogeneity inspection χ2=1.03, P=0.31]. Pirfenidon could not improve the changing rate of lowest SpO2 in 6-minute walking test[WMD=0.82, 95% CI (-1.35, 2.98), Z=0.74, P=0.46; heterogeneity inspection χ2=8.90, P=0.003] and could not reduce the mortality[RR=0.62, 95% CI (0.37, 1.03), Z=1.85, P=0.06; heterogeneity inspection χ2=3.05, P=0.55]. The incidences of photosensitivity, dizziness, nausea, abdominal discomfort, joint pain, fatigue in pirfenidone group were more frequent than those in placebo group. ConclusionsBecause of lack of enough eligible studies and defects in design and reporting data in the studies, this meta-analysis can not evaluate pirfenidone's long-term efficacy and safety. Hence, the existed clinical evidences can't support pirfenidone to be the treatment of IPF medication.