• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Author
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Author "LIAO Wen" 1 results
        • Comparison of Effect of Two Common First-line Triple Therapies on Helicobacter Pylori Infection

          目的:觀察兩種常用一線根除幽門螺桿菌(H.pylori)三聯方案在本地區(成都市)的療效。方法:納入70例診斷為消化性潰瘍、慢性糜爛性胃炎、慢性萎縮性胃炎伴H.pylori感染的患者。隨機分為A、B兩組。A組采用埃索美拉唑(E)20 mg bid+克拉霉素(C)500 mg bid+甲硝唑(M)400 mg bid,B組采用E 20 mg bid+ C 500 mg bid+阿莫西林(A)1.0g bid治療,療程7天。H.pylori根除失敗者以1周四聯方案:E 20 mg bid+膠體次枸櫞酸鉍(B)220 mg bid+呋喃唑酮100 mg bid+ A1.0g bid治療,觀察療效。結果:64例完成實驗。三聯方案H.pylori根除率:A組62.5%,B組84.4%,有顯著差異(Plt;0.05)。二線四聯方案根除率94.1%。結論:ECA方案H.pylori根除率明顯高于ECM方案,可能更適合于本地區根除H.pylori的一線治療,EBFA方案作為二線治療具有較高療效。

          Release date:2016-09-08 09:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜