Objective?To assess the efficacy and safety of Hirudoid for microcirculation disorder. Methods?We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, and VIP databases up to December 2009. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs concerning Hirudoid for microcirculation disorder were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 5.0.1, and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan software 5.0. Results?Twenty-five RCTs were included, of which only one was graded as high quality and others were of low quality. The results of meta-analyses showed: Hirudoid could be effective in preventing the occurrence of phlebitis (OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.25). Hirudoid for treating phlebitis was also significantly better than magnesium sulfate or placebo (OR=7.18, 95%CI 4.59 to 11.22) and the time to symptom relief of Hirudoid was significantly shorter than placebo (MD= –?29, 95%CI –?37.30 to –?20.70). Hirudoid for internal fistula in hemodialysis patients was better than the simple hot compress (OR=8.89, 95%CI 4.25 to 18.58), and also better than the magnesium sulfate plus hot compress (OR=7.62, 95%CI 2.84 to 20.44). Hirudoid could also prevent the formation of hematoma and eliminate hematoma quickly. Hirudoid for tissue injury caused by irritating fluid extravasation was significantly better than magnesium sulfate (OR=4.25, 95%CI 2.06 to 8.78). Conclusion?Hirudoid can significantly improve the microcirculation disorder, especially to the phlebitis. Due to the low quality of the included studies, further, more high quality trials are required.