• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Author
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Author "唐宏超" 2 results
        • 改良腰椎后路椎間植骨融合術治療退變性腰椎失穩

          目的? 總結改良腰椎后路椎間植骨融合術(posterior? lumbar? interbody? fusion,PLIF)治療退變性腰椎失穩的療效。? 方法 ? 2006 年 5 月- 2008 年 1 月,采用改良 PLIF 治療退變性腰椎失穩患者 36 例。男 21 例,女 15 例;年齡 38 ~ 61 歲,平均 48.7 歲。病程 6 ~ 26 個月。病變位于 L3、 4?2 例, L4、 5?16 例, L5、 S1?13 例, L4 ~ 5、 S1?5 例。術后定期隨訪評估臨床療效、植骨融合率和椎間隙高度。? 結果? 1例術后1周出現切口急性金黃色葡萄球菌感染,對癥治療后痊愈;余 35 例切口Ⅰ期愈合。36 例均獲隨訪,隨訪時間 16 ~ 26 個月,平均 18 個月。術后 1 年薄層螺旋 CT 掃描三維重建可見完全的骨小梁連接,達骨性融合。術前椎間隙高度為(9.5?±?1.2)mm,術后 7?d 為(11.2?±?1.1)mm,末次隨訪時為(11.0?±?1.1)mm,手術前后比較差異均有統計學意義(P?lt;?0.01),術后 7?d 與末次隨訪比較差異無統計學意義(P?gt;?0.05)。采用日本骨科協會(JOA)下腰痛評分標準,獲優 29 例,良 5 例,中 2 例,優良率 94.4%。? 結論? 改良 PLIF 治療退變性腰椎失穩最大限度保留了后柱結構,創傷小,植骨融合率高,椎間隙高度維持良好,臨床療效滿意。

          Release date:2016-08-31 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

          Objective To explore the feasibility of utilizing spinal surgery robots in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). Methods Patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) who were admitted to the First People’s Hospital of Shuangliu District, Chengdu between June 2022 and June 2024 were selected. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a robot-assisted group and a manual group in a 1∶1 ratio. The fractured vertebral height, Cobb angle, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between the two groups on postoperative day 1 and at 6 months postoperatively. The degree of puncture deviation, bone cement distribution and leakage on postoperative day 1, as well as Odom’s criteria scores at 6 months postoperatively, were also compared between the two groups. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled, with 65 patients in each group. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in postoperative height restoration of fractured vertebrae and correction of the Cobb angle between the two groups. Compared with the manual group, the robot-assisted group exhibited shorter operative duration [(32.5±7.3) vs. (35.4±7.1) minutes], fewer intraoperative fluoroscopic exposure times [(20.6±3.4) vs. (22.9±4.5) times], less puncture deviation, a lower bone cement leakage rate (12.3% vs. 26.2%), and more uniform bone cement distribution within vertebral bodies (P<0.05). ODI and VAS scores were significantly improved at postoperative day 1 and 6 months postoperatively compared with preoperative baseline in both groups (P<0.05), yet no intergroup differences were observed at either time point (P>0.05). Odom’s criteria scores at the final follow-up indicated satisfactory overall clinical outcomes for patients in both groups, with no significant intergroup difference (P>0.05). No additional complications were recorded in either group. Conclusion The application of robot-assisted PKP for thoracolumbar OVCF can shorten the operation time, reduce the radiation exposure dose, optimize the distribution of bone cement within the vertebrae, and decrease the risk of leakage.

          Release date:2026-07-27 01:33 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜