1. |
[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2003; 27(4)∶652.
|
2. |
helical CT.
|
3. |
[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2002; 27(6)∶720.
|
4. |
[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2003; 180(5)∶ 1131.
|
5. |
|
6. |
[J]. Radiology, 2000; 214(2)∶ 517.
|
7. |
|
8. |
[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2002; 26(3)∶ 392.
|
9. |
|
10. |
[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002; 179(1)∶ 53.
|
11. |
|
12. |
[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001; 176(1)∶ 193.
|
13. |
|
14. |
[J]. Transplantation, 1999; 68(6)∶ 798.
|
15. |
|
16. |
[J]. Transplantation, 2000; 69(11)∶ 2410.
|
17. |
[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2003; 27(2)∶ 125.
|
18. |
|
19. |
[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999; 172(4)∶ 925.
|
20. |
[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1996; 20(1)∶122.
|
21. |
[J]. Am J Surg, 2001; 182(1)∶6.
|
22. |
[J]. Can J Surg, 1995; 38(2)∶117.
|
23. |
[J]. J Trauma, 1999; 46(5)∶847.
|
24. |
[J]. J Trauma, 2001; 51(6)∶1128.
|
25. |
[J]. Radiology, 1995; 195(2)∶363.
|
26. |
threedimensional contrastenhanced magnetic resonance angiograp.
|
27. |
[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2003; 9(10)∶2317.
|
28. |
Byun JH, Kim TK, Lee SS, et al. Evaluation of the hepatic artery in potential donors for living donor liver transplantation by computed tomography angiography using multidetectorrow computed tomography: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection techniques.
|
29. |
Hong KC, Freeny PC. Pancreaticoduodenal arcades and dorsal pancreatic artery: comparison of CT angiography with threedimensional volume rendering, maximum intensity projection, and shadedsurface display.
|
30. |
Soyer P, Heath D, Bluemke DA, et al.Threedimensional helical CT of intrahepatic venous structures: comparison of three rendering techniques.
|
31. |
Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Passannante MR. Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy.
|
32. |
Catre MG. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective studies.
|
33. |
Mele TS, Stewart K, Marokus B, et al. Evaluation of a diagnostic protocol using screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage with selective use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma.
|
34. |
Gonzalez RP, Ickler J, Gachassin P. Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.
|
35. |
Winter TC 3rd, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with threedimensional CT arteriography.
|
36. |
Lin J, Chen XH, Zhou KR, et al. BuddiChiari syndrome: diagnosis with.
|
37. |
Kamel IR, Georgiades C, Fishman EK. Incremental value of advanced image processing of multislice computed tomography data in the evaluation of hypervascular liver lesions.
|
38. |
Sheth S, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Vascular sequelae of cirrhosis: evaluation with dualphase.
|
39. |
Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Charnsangarej C, et al.Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of pancreatic cancer.
|
40. |
Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, et al. Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering.
|
41. |
Bradbury MS, Kavanagh PV, Chen MY. Noninvasive assessment of portomesenteric venous thrombosis: current concepts and imaging strategies.
|
42. |
Sahani D, Saini S, Pena C, et al. Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results.
|
43. |
Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Pomfret EA, et al.Impact of multidetector CT on donor selection and surgical planning before living adult right lobe liver transplantation.
|
44. |
Marcos A, Fisher RA, Ham JM, et al. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation.
|
45. |
Marcos A, Fisher RA, Ham JM, et al. Selection and outcome of living donors for adult to adult right lobe transplantation.
|