【摘要】 目的 分析國內醫學期刊發表的災害護理文獻，為災害護理證據的生產和傳播提供參考。 方法 檢索中國知網CNKI全文數據庫醫藥衛生專輯（1991~2010.01），收集災害護理相關文獻，進行分類和描述性統計分析。 結果 207篇文獻中，2008年前發表32篇（15.47%），2008年及以后發表175篇（85.53%）。文獻分布于67種醫學期刊，其中護理類17種98篇（47.34%），非護理類50種109篇（52.66%）。統計源期刊137篇（66.18%），其他期刊70篇（33.72%）。護理類統計源期刊收錄79篇，占護理類期刊刊發數的80.61%。以經驗類128篇（61.84%），理論類60篇（28.98%），研究類19篇（9.18%）；內容以醫療救護類94篇（61.84%），管理類 72篇（28.98%），教育類31篇（14.98%），其他類10篇（4.83%）；醫療救護類文獻中，未見慢性病相關文獻。 結論 2008年是災害護理文獻增長的分界點，統計源期刊是證據的主要來源。災害護理文獻以經驗類為主，涵蓋災害醫療救護、管理及教育，需要開發災害慢性病護理證據。
【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the literature on disaster nursing published in medical journals and provide reference for the development and dissemination of evidence on disaster nursing. Methods Papers on disaster nursing were get from the CNKI database (1991 to January 2010). After classification, they were inputted to excel and descriptive analysis was applied. Results There were totally 207 papers, among which 32 (15.47%) were published before 2008 and 175 (85.53%) were published in and after 2008. Papers were published in 67 medical journals, for which 17 (98 papers, 47.34%) were nursing Journals, while 50 (109 papers, 52.66%)were not nursing. one hundred and thirty-seren papers (66.18%) were published in Source Journals for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations, 70 (33.72%) were not. Seventy-nine papers were published in nursing journals for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations. On the type, 128 papers (61.84%) were experience ones, 60 (28.98%) were theoretical papers and 19 (9.18%) were research papers. On the content, 94 (61.84%) were about nursing and rescue practice, 72 (28.98%) were about disaster nursing management, 31 (14.98%) were on disaster nursing education and 10 (4.83%) were others. No literature on chronic disease was found among papers on nursing and rescue practice. Conclusion The year 2008 is apoint for the development of disaster nursing evidence. The evidence were published in kinds of medical journals. The Source Journals for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations were the main source for the evidence. The evidence were mainly experience ones. The evidence covered in the fields of nursing and rescue practice, disaster nursing management and disaster nursing education, literature on disaster amp; chronic disease was needed.
引用本文： 王磊,成翼娟,馮靈,許勤. 醫學期刊發表災害護理文獻的分析. 華西醫學, 2010, 25(8): 1556-1558. doi: 復制