【摘要】 目的 評價低場MRI對膝關節半月板撕裂的診斷準確性。 方法 2009年9月-2010年4月經關節鏡檢或手術確診的膝關節損傷患者69例,其中35例41個半月板撕裂,回顧性分析、整理其臨床、關節鏡及MRI表現,以傳統Reicher診斷的改良分級標準確定半月板撕裂的級別、形態并記錄,同時對關節內其它伴隨征象作統計。 結果 35例41個撕裂半月板中,17個為盤狀半月板,MRI顯示Ⅲa級撕裂信號24個,Ⅲb級撕裂信號5個,Ⅲc級撕裂信號4個,Ⅳ級撕裂信號1個,桶柄狀撕裂信號7個。本組低場MRI診斷半月板撕裂的敏感度、特異度、準確度分別為93.18%、92.11%、92.68%。 結論 低場MRI診斷膝關節半月板撕裂與關節鏡結果差異不大,是一種診斷半月板撕裂的可靠、無創性檢查方法。
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of low-field MRI in the diagnosis of meniscus tears. Methods We collected the clinical data of 69 patients with knee joint injuries confirmed by surgical operation or arthroscopy from Septembe 2009 to April 2010. Among them, 35 patients had 41 cases of meniscus tears. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical symptoms, and their manifestations on low-field MRI and arthroscopy. According to the modified diagnostic criteria based on Reicher’s diagnosis, the grade and the shape of meniscus tears were determined and recorded, and other accompanying signs inside the joint were also analyzed statistically. Results Among the 41 cases of meniscus tears of 35 patients, 17 were discoid meniscus. MRI showed that there were 24 signals of Ⅲa tears, 5 of Ⅲb tears, 4 of Ⅲc tears, 1 of Ⅳ tears and 7 of bucket-handle tears. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of low-field MRI in the diagnosis of meniscus tears were 93.18%, 92.11%, and 92.68%, respectively. Conclusions There is no significant difference between the results of arthroscopy and low-field MRI in diagnosing meniscus tears. Consequently, MRI is a reliable and non-invasive method in the diagnosis of meniscus tears.
引用本文: 黃文光,陳海燕. 膝關節半月板撕裂的低場MRI及關節鏡表現評估. 華西醫學, 2011, 26(2): 222-225. doi: 復制