• 1. Department of Military Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Information Management, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200434, P. R. China;
WANG Zhiyong, Email: pbkiller@126.com; WU Cheng, Email: wucheng_wu@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To introduce and validate the censoring unbiased deep learning (CUDL) algorithm suitable for survival data and to explore its utility in survival analysis. Methods The principles of the CUDL algorithm were detailed, followed by an introduction to its software implementation steps and parameter settings. Using the construction of a long-term survival prognosis model for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) as a case study, the algorithms were compared with the conventional Cox proportional hazards model and random survival forest model. Results In the task of predicting the 5-year survival probability of patients, the mean Brier score (BS) of both the Buckley-James censoring unbiased deep learning (BJDL) model and the regularized BJDL were superior to that of the Cox proportional hazards model (mean BS: 0.1722 and 0.1715 vs. 0.1765, P<0.001). The regularized BJDL also outperformed the random survival forest model (RSF500) (mean BS: 0.1715 vs. 0.1750, P<0.001). Conclusion The BJDL can effectively leverage censored information within survival data to achieve accurate predictions without the need to satisfy the proportional hazards assumption. It provides a novel methodological alternative for the analysis of medical survival data.

Citation: XIAO Xiaochun, LI Dongdong, KUANG Mengling, QIN Yingyi, GUO Yibin, LI Xian, WANG Zhiyong, WU Cheng. Deep learning-based survival analysis models: principles, implementation, and applications. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2026, 26(6): 717-722. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202510114 Copy

Copyright ? the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Current research and future directions on fairness in clinical prediction models
  • Next Article

    Guidelines for the construction of high-quality datasets for artificial intelligence: an interpretation