• 1. NHC Key Laboratory of Pneumoconiosis, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030000, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Ultrasound Imaging, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030000, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory and Pathology, Shanxi Armed Police Corps Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030000, P. R. China;
CHENG Li, Email: chenglimed@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To identify new potential drug targets for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in order to improve the current situation where there are very few effective treatments for IPF. Methods  This study integrates protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) data from the deCODE cohort and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data of whole blood from the GTEx-V8 and eQTLGen databases, and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of IPF, and employs a multi-dimensional genetic epidemiology approach for analysis. Specifically, it includes: assessing the causal relationship between protein levels and IPF risk using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) methods; examining the potential associations between gene expression and IPF using summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) analysis; and determining the sharing of genetic variants between pQTL/eQTL and GWAS signals using Bayesian colocalization analysis. On this basis, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was further constructed, and target druggability assessment and potential drug prediction were performed to evaluate the biological significance and therapeutic potential of candidate targets. Results  This study identified two proteins significantly associated with IPF: BRSK2 (β=1.222 7, P=1.12×10–10) and AP2A2 (β=2.854 3, P=1.22×10–7). The analysis suggests that these two proteins may participate in the occurrence and progression of IPF by affecting the balance of lung tissue injury and repair or by modulating fibrosis-related signaling pathways, and increased levels of both BRSK2 and AP2A2 proteins were significantly associated with an increased risk of IPF. Further Bayesian colocalization analysis indicated that AP2A2 shares genetic variant loci with IPF, with posterior probabilities of PPH0=1.49×10–11, PPH1=7.6×10–5, PPH2=1.99×10–10, PPH3=1.33×10–5, and PPH4=0.999 9, suggesting a high degree of genetic signal concordance between them. For external validation, analyses based on the ARIC and UK Biobank databases further supported a potential causal association between BRSK2 and IPF, showing that genetic variants leading to increased BRSK2 protein levels also increased the risk of developing IPF (P=0.004). Conclusions  At the protein and gene expression levels, this study provides genetic evidence supporting a potential causal association of AP2A2 and BRSK2 with IPF. These proteins may participate in the pathogenesis and progression of IPF by influencing the balance of lung tissue injury and repair or fibrosis-related signaling pathways. They may also serve as potential therapeutic targets for IPF. However, their specific mechanisms of action require further elucidation.

Copyright ? the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved