• 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Huai’an Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai’an, Jiangsu 223300, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of General Surgery, Xuyi County People’s Hospital, Huai’an, Jiangsu 211700, P. R. China;
SUN Yong, Email: xufu1983@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrathin choledochoscopy for patients with gallbladder stones complicated by non-dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods This retrospective study included patients with gallbladder stones complicated by non-dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones who were treated at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Huai’an Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, from January 2024 to December 2025. Patients were divided into two groups based on different treatment strategies: the ultrathin choledochoscopy group (n=66) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with transcystic ultrathin choledochoscopy for common bile duct stone extraction; the endoscopic group (n=61) received LC combined with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 127 patients were enrolled, including 66 in the ultrathin choledochoscopy group and 61 in the endoscopic group. Compare with endoscopic group, the ultrathin choledochoscopy group exhibited significantly shorter operation time [(82.15±17.87) min vs. (104.26±23.99) min, P<0.001], shorter time to first postoperative flatus [(1.77±0.78) d vs. (2.19±0.79) d, P=0.004], and shorter length of hospital stay [(4.98±1.99) d vs. (5.89±2.65) d, P=0.032]; lower white blood cell count [(9.95±2.57)×10?/L vs. (11.09±3.28)×10?/L, P=0.033], neutrophil count [(7.20±2.26)×10?/L vs. (8.22±2.58)×10?/L, P=0.021], hypersensitive C-reactive protein [(39.79±17.58) mg/L vs. (48.43±20.04) mg/L, P=0.012] on postoperative day 1; lower total hospital costs [(2.00±0.26)×104 yuan vs. (2.64±0.32)×104 yuan, P<0.001], as well as a lower total complication rate [1.52% (1/66) vs. 10.53% (6/57), P=0.048]. The ultrathin choledochoscopy group achieved a higher surgical success rate than the endoscopic group [100% (66/66) vs. 93.44% (57/61), P=0.049]. During the follow-up, no patients in either group presented with bile duct stricture, reflux cholangitis, or stone recurrence. Conclusion The ultrathin choledochoscopy approach via the cystic duct has advantages in operative duration, early postoperative recovery, and total hospital costs, and provides a novel treatment option for patients with gallbladder stones complicated by non-dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones.

Citation: XU Liang, SUN Yong. Efficacy of ultrathin choledochoscopy for gallbladder stones complicated by non-dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2026, 33(7): 940-946. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.202604126 Copy

Copyright ? the editorial department of CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Development of recurrence risk prediction model based on ultrasound radiomics features combined with clinical variables for papillary thyroid cancer with concomitant Hashimoto thyroiditis after surgery
  • Next Article

    Lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and literature review