Objective To evaluate the screw-placement accuracy and technical advantages of patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed drill guide-assisted C2 pedicle screw placement in bone models derived from patients with basilar invagination, and to provide evidence for clinical screw-placement strategies in high-risk craniocervical junction deformities. Methods Preoperative thin-slice CT data from 9 patients with basilar invagination treated between June 2016 and July 2025 were used. For each patient, two 1∶1-scale 3D-printed upper cervical spine models were fabricated, and assigned to the guide-assisted group and the freehand group by computer-generated block randomization. Bilateral C2 screws were inserted by the same spine surgeon according to a standardized protocol. In the guide-assisted group, screw placement was performed in the following sequence: guide positioning, guide pin insertion, guide removal followed by enlargement drilling, tapping, and screw insertion. In the freehand group, screw placement was performed by anatomical landmark-based localization, stepwise drilling with fluoroscopic correction, enlargement drilling and tapping, and screw insertion. The primary outcomes were postoperative CT-based Gertzbein-Robbins (GR) grading of screw position and the GR grade 0/1 acceptability rate. Secondary outcomes included entry-point deviation, axial angle deviation, and the number of fluoroscopic exposures. Results The two assessors showed good agreement in GR grading, with a Kappa coefficient>0.80, indicating reliable evaluations. Postoperative CT assessment showed that the overall distribution of GR grades was significantly better in the guide-assisted group than in the freehand group (P<0.05). The GR grade 0/1 acceptability rate was higher in the guide-assisted group, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Entry-point deviation, axial angle deviation, and the number of fluoroscopic exposures were all significantly lower in the guide-assisted group than in the freehand group (P<0.05). Conclusion Patient-specific 3D-printed drill guides can reduce geometric deviations in C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination and decrease the number of fluoroscopic exposures. They show a potential advantage in improving the GR grade 0/1 acceptability rate; however, further clinical studies with larger samples are needed for verification.
Citation：
LI Jinhu, JIANG Weili, CHENG Jiawei, NIU Chong, SI Wenshuo, NIU Guoqi. Experimental study of patient-specific three-dimensional-printed drill guide-assisted C2 pedicle screw placement in models derived from patients with basilar invagination. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2026, 40(5): 723-730. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202511085
Copy
Copyright ? the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved
| 1. |
|
| 2. |
|
| 3. |
|
| 4. |
|
| 5. |
|
| 6. |
|
| 7. |
|
| 8. |
|
| 9. |
|
| 10. |
|
| 11. |
|
| 12. |
|
| 13. |
|
| 14. |
|
| 15. |
|
| 16. |
|
| 17. |
|
| 18. |
|
| 19. |
|
| 20. |
|
| 21. |
|
| 22. |
|
| 23. |
|
| 24. |
|
| 25. |
|
| 26. |
|
| 27. |
|
| 28. |
|
| 29. |
|
| 30. |
|
| 31. |
|
| 32. |
|
| 33. |
|
| 34. |
|
| 35. |
|
| 36. |
U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical devices[R]. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, 2017.
|
| 37. |
|
| 38. |
|
| 39. |
|
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical devices[R]. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, 2017.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
