Comparison of effectiveness between endoscopic and microscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

HUANG Chengyu ¹ , CHEN Kai ² , LIU Honglin ¹ , GE Zhilin ¹ , LIN Dingkun ^1,3 , CHEN Bolai ^1,3 , SU Guoyi ^1,3 , LIN Yongpeng ^1,3 , HOU Yu ^1,3 ,  LI Yongjin ^1,3,4

1. Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P. R. China;
2. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huizhou Sixth People’s Hospital, Huizhou Guangdong, 516211, P. R. China;
3. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510120, P. R. China;
4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510120, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

LI Yongjin, Email: lyj2106@126.com

Keywords：

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; spinal endoscopy; microscope; cervical spondylotic myelopathy; hidden blood loss; soft tissue swelling

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.202509077

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To compare the effectiveness of endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (Endo-ACDF) and microscope-assisted ACDF (Micro-ACDF) in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 44 patients with single-level CSM who underwent ACDF between February 2022 and January 2024 and met the selection criteria. These patients were divided into Endo-ACDF group (22 cases) and Micro-ACDF group (22 cases). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in baseline data, including gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, surgical level, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Cobb angle, and the degree of prevertebral soft tissue swelling (PSTS) at C_2-6. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, total blood loss, and hidden blood loss were recorded and compared between the two groups. The Cobb angle and PSTS degree at C_2-6 were measured based on X-ray films at 2-3 days after operation. The JOA score was used to assess spinal cord function at 1 year after operation. The differences between pre- and post-operation (change values) in these indicators were calculated and compared between groups. Results All operations in both groups were successfully completed. Compared to the Micro-ACDF group, the Endo-ACDF group had significantly longer operation time and significantly lower total blood loss and hidden blood loss (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative drainage volume (P>0.05). No operation-related complication occurred during or after the procedures. All patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13.9 months). At 1 year after operation, the JOA scores and Cobb angles in both groups showed significant improvement compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). However, the change values for JOA scores and Cobb angles showed no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The postoperative PSTS degree at C_2-6 was significantly different from preoperative values in both groups (P<0.05), but the change value did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). The imaging re-examination showed the satisfactory positioning of the cages and internal fixation.Conclusion Both Endo-ACDF and Micro-ACDF provide satisfactory effectiveness in treating single-level CSM, with no significant difference in the PSTS degree. Furthermore, Endo-ACDF is associated with less hidden blood loss.

Citation： HUANG Chengyu, CHEN Kai, LIU Honglin, GE Zhilin, LIN Dingkun, CHEN Bolai, SU Guoyi, LIN Yongpeng, HOU Yu, LI Yongjin. Comparison of effectiveness between endoscopic and microscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2026, 40(2): 219-226. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202509077 Copy

1.
2.	Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1958, 40-A(3): 607-624.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.	Iv W, Gao S, Cao C, et al. Endoscope-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Vis Exp, 2025, (218). doi: 10.3791/68292.
27.
28.
29.	Kim SW, Jang C, Yang MH, et al. The natural course of prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical spine surgery: how long will it last? Spine J, 2017, 17(9): 1297-1309.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.

1.
2. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1958, 40-A(3): 607-624.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26. Iv W, Gao S, Cao C, et al. Endoscope-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Vis Exp, 2025, (218). doi: 10.3791/68292.
27.
28.
29. Kim SW, Jang C, Yang MH, et al. The natural course of prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical spine surgery: how long will it last? Spine J, 2017, 17(9): 1297-1309.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Comparison of effectiveness between endoscopic and microscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content