| 1. |
Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Lancet Glob Health, 2014, 2(2): e106-e116[2014-01-03]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25104651/. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1.
|
| 2. |
Fleckenstein M, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Chakravarthy U. Age-related macular degeneration: a review[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331(2): 147-157. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.26074.
|
| 3. |
Schmidt-Erfurth U, Chong V, Loewenstein A, et al. Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA)[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2014, 98(9): 1144-1167. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305702.
|
| 4. |
Yang S, Zhao J, Sun X. Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2016, 10: 1857-1867. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S97653.
|
| 5. |
Sharma D, Zachary I, Jia H. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular eye diseases[J/OL]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2023, 64(5): 28[2023-05-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37252731/. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.5.28.
|
| 6. |
Perrott-Reynolds R, Cann R, Cronbach N, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of OCT angiography in naive and treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review[J]. Eye (Lond), 2019, 33(2): 274-282. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0229-6.
|
| 7. |
Crincoli E, Parravano MC, Sacconi R, et al. Updates on novel and traditional OCT and OCTA biomarkers in nAMD[J]. Eye (Lond), 2025, 39(9): 1662-1672. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03801-6.
|
| 8. |
Daien V, Finger RP, Talks JS, et al. Evolution of treatment paradigms in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review of real-world evidence[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021, 105(11): 1475-1479. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317434.
|
| 9. |
Nichani PAH, Popovic MM, Dhoot AS, et al. Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis[J]. Eye (Lond), 2023, 37(14): 2855-2863. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02439-6.
|
| 10. |
Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, et al. Analyzing formation and absorption of avascular subretinal hyperreflective material in nAMD from OCTA-based insights[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2024, 267: 192-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.019.
|
| 11. |
Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, et al. Prognostic value of macular neovascularisation characteristics for photoreceptor integrity in nAMD: a prospective observational study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 109(6): 689-696. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2024-326319.
|
| 12. |
Zhuang X, Pu J, Li M, et al. Association between three-dimensional morphological features and functional indicators of neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J/OL]. Microvasc Res, 2024, 155: 104716[2024-07-14]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39013515/. DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104716.
|
| 13. |
Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, et al. Association between early lesion response and long-term anti-VEGF injection frequency in nAMD: a 2-year prospective study using 3D volumetric analysis[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 110(1): 67-75. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2025-327339.
|
| 14. |
Spaide RF, Jaffe GJ, Sarraf D, et al. Consensus nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration data: consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(5): 616-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.004.
|
| 15. |
楊依柳, 楊婷婷, 陸方, 等. 新生血管性老年性黃斑變性亞型報告的國際新命名專家共識解讀[J]. 中華眼底病雜志, 2022, 38(2): 99-107. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20220128-00055.Yang YL, Yang TT, Lu F, et al. Brief interpretation of the consensus nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration data[J]. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2022, 38(2): 99-107. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20220128-00055.
|
| 16. |
CATT Research Group, Martin DF, Maguire MG, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364(20): 1897-1908. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102673.
|
| 17. |
Ho AC, Busbee BG, Regillo CD, et al. Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(11): 2181-2192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.009.
|
| 18. |
Nagata J, Shiose S, Ishikawa K, et al. Clinical characteristics of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and retinal pigment epithelium tears[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(17): 5496[2023-08-24]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37685562/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175496.
|
| 19. |
Inoue M, Arakawa A, Yamane S, et al. Variable response of vascularized pigment epithelial detachments to ranibizumab based on lesion subtypes, including polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy[J]. Retina, 2013, 33(5): 990-997. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182755793.
|
| 20. |
Martin-Pinardel R, Izquierdo-Serra J, Bernal-Morales C, et al. Fluid fluctuations assessed with artificial intelligence during the maintenance phase impact anti-vascular endothelial growth factor visual outcomes in a multicentre, routine clinical care national age-related macular degeneration database[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 109(10): 1161-1170. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2024-325615.
|
| 21. |
Razavi H, Baglin E, Sharangan P, et al. Gaming to improve vision: 21st century self-monitoring for patients with age-related macular degeneration[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018, 46(5): 480-484. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13097.
|
| 22. |
Dansingani KK, Tan ACS, Gilani F, et al. Subretinal hyperreflective material imaged with optical coherence tomography angiography[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 169: 235-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.031.
|
| 23. |
Willoughby AS, Ying GS, Toth CA, et al. Subretinal hyperreflective material in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials[J]. Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(9): 1846-1853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.042.
|
| 24. |
Ehlers JP, Zahid R, Kaiser PK, et al. Longitudinal assessment of ellipsoid zone integrity, subretinal hyperreflective material, and subretinal pigment epithelium disease in neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2021, 5(12): 1204-1213. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.012.
|
| 25. |
Sadda S, Sarraf D, Khanani AM, et al. Comparative assessment of subretinal hyper-reflective material in patients treated with brolucizumab versus aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2024, 108(6): 852-858. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323577.
|
| 26. |
Kawashima Y, Hata M, Oishi A, et al. Association of vascular versus avascular subretinal hyperreflective material with aflibercept response in age-related macular degeneration[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017, 181: 61-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.015.
|
| 27. |
Cho HJ, Kim KM, Kim HS, et al. Response of pigment epithelial detachment to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in age-related macular degeneration[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 166: 112-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.039.
|
| 28. |
Chakravarthy U, Havilio M, Syntosi A, et al. Impact of macular fluid volume fluctuations on visual acuity during anti-VEGF therapy in eyes with nAMD[J]. Eye (Lond), 2021, 35(11): 2983-2990. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01354-4.
|
| 29. |
Ehlers JP, Lunasco LM, Yordi S, et al. Compartmental exudative dynamics in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: volumetric outcomes and impact of volatility in a phase III clinical trial[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2024, 8(8): 765-777. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.02.010.
|
| 30. |
Evans RN, Reeves BC, Maguire MG, et al. Associations of variation in retinal thickness with visual acuity and anatomic outcomes in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration lesions treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2020, 138(10): 1043-1051. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3001.
|
| 31. |
Tuerksever C, Pruente C, Hatz K. High frequency SD-OCT follow-up leading to up to biweekly intravitreal ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 6816[2021-03-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33767261/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86348-2.
|
| 32. |
Sheth VS, Holekamp NM, Khanani AM, et al. Retinal fluid and thickness fluctuations in archway trial for port delivery system with ranibizumab versus monthly ranibizumab injections[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2025, 9(4): 330-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.10.015.
|
| 33. |
Sheth V, D' Rozario M, Gune S, et al. Fluctuations in central foveal thickness and association with vision outcomes with anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD: HARBOR post hoc analysis[J/OL]. BMJ Open Ophthalmol, 2022, 7(1): e000957[2022-03-09]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35342822/. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000957.
|
| 34. |
Chantarasorn Y, Ruamviboonsuk P, Thoongsuwan S, et al. Clinical correlation of retinal fluid fluctuation represented by fluctuation index in wet age-related macular degeneration: TOWER Study Report 2[J/OL]. Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2023, 12(10): 2[2023-10-03]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37787990/. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.10.2.
|
| 35. |
Schmidt-Erfurth U, Mulyukov Z, Gerendas BS, et al. Therapeutic response in the HAWK and HARRIER trials using deep learning in retinal fluid volume and compartment analysis[J]. Eye (Lond), 2023, 37(6): 1160-1169. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02077-4.
|
| 36. |
Jhaveri C, Wykoff CC, Khanani AM, et al. Early residual fluid-free status and long-term BCVA outcomes: a treatment agnostic, post Hoc analysis of pooled HAWK and HARRIER data[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2022, 236: 12-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.017.
|
| 37. |
Eichenbaum D, Brown DM, Ip M, et al. Impact of retinal fluid-free months on outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a treatment agnostic analysis of the HAWK and HARRIER studies[J]. Retina, 2023, 43(4): 632-640. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003699.
|
| 38. |
Arnold JJ, Markey CM, Kurstjens NP, et al. The role of sub-retinal fluid in determining treatment outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration--a phase Ⅳ randomised clinical trial with ranibizumab: the FLUID study[J/OL]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16: 31[2016-03-24]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27009515/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0207-3.
|
| 39. |
Feo A, Stradiotto E, Sacconi R, et al. Subretinal hyperreflective material in retinal and chorioretinal disorders: a comprehensive review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2024, 69(3): 362-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.013.
|
| 40. |
Roberts PK, Zotter S, Montuoro A, et al. Identification and quantification of the angiofibrotic switch in neovascular AMD[J/OL]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(1): 304[2019-01-02]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30657855/. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-25189.
|
| 41. |
Forte P, Fontana V, Muzio J, et al. Predictors of 24-month onset of macular fibrosis in type 3 macular neovascularisation[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2024, 108(9): 1240-1248. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324713.
|
| 42. |
Casalino G, Stevenson MR, Bandello F, et al. Tomographic biomarkers predicting progression to fibrosis in treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a multimodal imaging study[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2018, 2(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.08.019.
|
| 43. |
Chhatwal S, Antony H, Lamei S, et al. A systematic review of the cell death mechanisms in retinal pigment epithelium cells and photoreceptors after subretinal hemorrhage – implications for treatment options[J/OL]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 167: 115572[2023-09-22]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37742603/. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115572.
|